Abstract
Livestock are one of the important components of the different region farming systems in Gujarat region. Fertilizer management affects both the productivity and nutritive value of forage legume crops. The influence of Schoenite in combination with different potassic fertilizers on fodder lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) was evaluated through field experiments at Main Forage Research Station, Anand Agricultural University, Anand on loamy sand soil during rabi season of the year 2019-2020. The plant height, Number of tillers per meter raw length at first and second cut tended to increase with the application of potassic fertilizer through soil and foliar spray. The magnitude of per cent increase in green fodder yield (101.11, 33.24 and 50.08) and dry matter yield (132.07, 67.40 and 79.49) of lucerne was found at the first and second cut as well as in total yield, respectively with response to 25 kg K2O ha-1 through Schoenite + Schoenite spray @1% over the RDF + water spray. The same treatment recorded higher crude protein content and yield. The significant differences in P, K, S, and Mg content and uptake before and after spray by crop were observed due to potassic fertilization.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Green fodder yield of lucerne at the first and second cut increased by 101.11% with 25 kg K2O ha-1 Schoenite plus Schoenite spray relative to RDF plus water spray.
- Taxon
- lucerne
Medicago sativae1 - Treatment
- 25 kg K2O ha-1 through Schoenite + Schoenite spray @1%e1
- Outcome
- green fodder yielde1
- Direction
- increasee1
- Value
- 101.11e1
- Comparator
- RDF + water spraye1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on fodder lucerne (Medicago sativa L.)”
e1“The magnitude of per cent increase in green fodder yield (101.11, 33.24 and 50.08) and dry matter yield (132.07, 67.40 and 79.49) of lucerne was found at the first and second cut as well as in total yield, respectively with response to 25 kg K2O ha-1 through Schoenite + Schoenite spray @1% over the RDF + water spray”
Claim · model-written summary
Green fodder yield of lucerne at the second cut increased by 33.24% with 25 kg K2O ha-1 Schoenite plus Schoenite spray relative to RDF plus water spray.
- Taxon
- lucerneMedicago sativae1
- Treatment
- 25 kg K2O ha-1 through Schoenite + Schoenite spray @1%e1
- Outcome
- green fodder yielde1
- Direction
- increasee1
- Value
- 33.24e1
- Comparator
- RDF + water spraye1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on fodder lucerne (Medicago sativa L.)”
e1“The magnitude of per cent increase in green fodder yield (101.11, 33.24 and 50.08) and dry matter yield (132.07, 67.40 and 79.49) of lucerne was found at the first and second cut as well as in total yield, respectively with response to 25 kg K2O ha-1 through Schoenite + Schoenite spray @1% over the RDF + water spray”
Claim · model-written summary
Total green fodder yield of lucerne increased by 50.08% with 25 kg K2O ha-1 Schoenite plus Schoenite spray relative to RDF plus water spray.
- Taxon
- lucerneMedicago sativae1
- Treatment
- 25 kg K2O ha-1 through Schoenite + Schoenite spray @1%e1
- Outcome
- green fodder yielde1
- Direction
- increasee1
- Value
- 50.08e1
- Qualifier
- in total yielde1
- Comparator
- RDF + water spraye1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on fodder lucerne (Medicago sativa L.)”
e1“The magnitude of per cent increase in green fodder yield (101.11, 33.24 and 50.08) and dry matter yield (132.07, 67.40 and 79.49) of lucerne was found at the first and second cut as well as in total yield, respectively with response to 25 kg K2O ha-1 through Schoenite + Schoenite spray @1% over the RDF + water spray”
Claim · model-written summary
Dry matter yield of lucerne at the first cut increased by 132.07% with 25 kg K2O ha-1 Schoenite plus Schoenite spray relative to RDF plus water spray.
- Taxon
- lucerneMedicago sativae1
- Treatment
- 25 kg K2O ha-1 through Schoenite + Schoenite spray @1%e1
- Outcome
- dry matter yielde1
- Direction
- increasee1
- Value
- 132.07e1
- Comparator
- RDF + water spraye1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on fodder lucerne (Medicago sativa L.)”
e1“The magnitude of per cent increase in green fodder yield (101.11, 33.24 and 50.08) and dry matter yield (132.07, 67.40 and 79.49) of lucerne was found at the first and second cut as well as in total yield, respectively with response to 25 kg K2O ha-1 through Schoenite + Schoenite spray @1% over the RDF + water spray”
Claim · model-written summary
Dry matter yield of lucerne at the second cut increased by 67.40% with 25 kg K2O ha-1 Schoenite plus Schoenite spray relative to RDF plus water spray.
- Taxon
- lucerneMedicago sativae1
- Treatment
- 25 kg K2O ha-1 through Schoenite + Schoenite spray @1%e1
- Outcome
- dry matter yielde1
- Direction
- increasee1
- Value
- 67.40e1
- Comparator
- RDF + water spraye1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on fodder lucerne (Medicago sativa L.)”
e1“The magnitude of per cent increase in green fodder yield (101.11, 33.24 and 50.08) and dry matter yield (132.07, 67.40 and 79.49) of lucerne was found at the first and second cut as well as in total yield, respectively with response to 25 kg K2O ha-1 through Schoenite + Schoenite spray @1% over the RDF + water spray”
Claim · model-written summary
Total dry matter yield of lucerne increased by 79.49% with 25 kg K2O ha-1 Schoenite plus Schoenite spray relative to RDF plus water spray.
- Taxon
- lucerneMedicago sativae1
- Treatment
- 25 kg K2O ha-1 through Schoenite + Schoenite spray @1%e1
- Outcome
- dry matter yielde1
- Direction
- increasee1
- Value
- 79.49e1
- Qualifier
- in total yielde1
- Comparator
- RDF + water spraye1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on fodder lucerne (Medicago sativa L.)”
e1“The magnitude of per cent increase in green fodder yield (101.11, 33.24 and 50.08) and dry matter yield (132.07, 67.40 and 79.49) of lucerne was found at the first and second cut as well as in total yield, respectively with response to 25 kg K2O ha-1 through Schoenite + Schoenite spray @1% over the RDF + water spray”
Claim · model-written summary
Potassic fertilizer applied through soil and foliar spray tended to increase plant height and tiller number of lucerne.
- Taxon
- fodder lucernee0
- Treatment
- potassic fertilizer through soil and foliar spraye2
- Outcome
- plant height, Number of tillers per meter raw lengthe2
- Direction
- tended to increasee2
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“on fodder lucerne (Medicago sativa L.)”
e2“The plant height, Number of tillers per meter raw length at first and second cut tended to increase with the application of potassic fertilizer through soil and foliar spray”
Claim · model-written summary
The same treatment increased crude protein content and yield of lucerne relative to RDF plus water spray.
Verbatim
e0“on fodder lucerne (Medicago sativa L.)”
e1“The magnitude of per cent increase in green fodder yield (101.11, 33.24 and 50.08) and dry matter yield (132.07, 67.40 and 79.49) of lucerne was found at the first and second cut as well as in total yield, respectively with response to 25 kg K2O ha-1 through Schoenite + Schoenite spray @1% over the RDF + water spray”
e3“The same treatment recorded higher crude protein content and yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Potassic fertilization caused significant differences in P, K and S content and uptake of lucerne before and after spray.
- Taxon
- fodder lucernee0
- Treatment
- potassic fertilizatione4
- Outcome
- P, K, Se4
- Comparator
- before and after spraye4
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e0“on fodder lucerne (Medicago sativa L.)”
e4“The significant differences in P, K, S, and Mg content and uptake before and after spray by crop were observed due to potassic fertilization”
Claim · model-written summary
Potassic fertilization caused significant differences in Mg content and uptake of lucerne before and after spray.
- Taxon
- fodder lucernee0
- Treatment
- potassic fertilizatione4
- Outcome
- Mg content and uptakee4
- Comparator
- before and after spraye4
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e0“on fodder lucerne (Medicago sativa L.)”
e4“The significant differences in P, K, S, and Mg content and uptake before and after spray by crop were observed due to potassic fertilization”
The same questions in other papers
potassium · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ
29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
34 papers more in this group
See all 38 papers →potassium · quality: protein · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →application · quality: protein · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →application · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results
30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
34 papers more in this group
See all 38 papers →fertilization · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results
150 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
180 papers more in this group
See all 184 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.