Paper · 2024 · Journal of Scientific Research and Reports

Impacts of Calotropis and Azadirachta Green Leaf Manure and Bio Decomposer on Growth and Yield of Lentil

Amit Solanki; Rajesh Singh Chauhan; Aakash; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to study the effect of integrated nitrogen management on growth and yield of lentil (Lens culinaris Madik.) at Agronomic Research Farm, R. S. M. (P. G.) College, Dhampur (Bijnor) during the Rabi season 2023. The experiment was laid down in a randomized block design having seven treatments i.e. Control, RDN (80% N) + Calotropis gigantea green leaf manuring (GLM) (20% N), RDN (80% N) + Neem GLM (20% N), RDN (80% N) + Calotropis gigantea GLM (20% N) + waste decomposer soil application (WDSA), RDN (80% N) + Neem GLM (20% N) + WDSA, RDN (80% N) + Calotropis gigantea leaf Cutting (20% N) dipped in waste decomposer (WD) solution, RDN (80% N) + Neem leaf Cutting (20% N) dipped in WD solution) and replicated three times. Significant increase in growth characters (plant height and fresh weight), yield contributing character (number of pods) and yields (grain yield and straw yield) was observed with integrated nitrogen management over control. Moreover, among integrated nitrogen management treatments, the integration of RDN (80% N) + Neem leaf Cutting (20% N) dipped in WD solution) came out to be best for growth parameters, yield attribute and yield. It is concluded from the experiment that RDN (80% N) + Neem leaf Cutting (20% N) dipped in WD solution is the most effective treatment for enhancing lentil production under Dhampur conditions. Recommendation of this findings would allow Lentil farmers to save money which otherwise would be spent on nitrogenous fertilizer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nitrogen management significantly increased plant height and fresh weight of lentil over control.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
integrated nitrogen managemente1
Outcome
plant height and fresh weighte1
Direction
increasee1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of lentil (Lens culinaris Madik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–140 · show in text ↑
e1

“Significant increase in growth characters (plant height and fresh weight), yield contributing character (number of pods) and yields (grain yield and straw yield) was observed with integrated nitrogen management over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–978 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nitrogen management significantly increased the number of pods of lentil over control.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
integrated nitrogen managemente1
Outcome
number of podse1
Direction
increasee1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of lentil (Lens culinaris Madik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–140 · show in text ↑
e1

“Significant increase in growth characters (plant height and fresh weight), yield contributing character (number of pods) and yields (grain yield and straw yield) was observed with integrated nitrogen management over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–978 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nitrogen management significantly increased grain yield and straw yield of lentil over control.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
integrated nitrogen managemente1
Outcome
grain yield and straw yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of lentil (Lens culinaris Madik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–140 · show in text ↑
e1

“Significant increase in growth characters (plant height and fresh weight), yield contributing character (number of pods) and yields (grain yield and straw yield) was observed with integrated nitrogen management over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–978 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDN (80% N) + Neem leaf cutting (20% N) dipped in WD solution was the best integrated nitrogen treatment for growth parameters, yield attributes and yield.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
RDN (80% N) + Neem leaf Cutting (20% N) dipped in WD solutione2
Outcome
growth parameters, yield attribute and yielde2
Direction
beste2
Comparator
among integrated nitrogen management treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of lentil (Lens culinaris Madik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–140 · show in text ↑
e2

“among integrated nitrogen management treatments, the integration of RDN (80% N) + Neem leaf Cutting (20% N) dipped in WD solution) came out to be best for growth parameters, yield attribute and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1189 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended integrated nitrogen management would let lentil farmers save money otherwise spent on nitrogenous fertilizer.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarise3
Outcome
save moneye3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Recommendation of this findings would allow Lentil farmers to save money which otherwise would be spent on nitrogenous fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1513 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

37 papers: 36 positive, 1 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

pruning · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.