Paper · 2024 · Sustainability & Circularity NOW

Optimizing Irrigation and Fertilization Contributes to Mitigating Nutrients Leaching While Improving Crop Yield: Insights From a Field Experiment and Density Functional Theory Calculation

Debo He; Yunfeng Wang; Yinlin Zang; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) losses from farmland pose a significant threat to non-point source pollution in plateau lakes. Reducing nutrient loss from cropland is essential for the sustainable agricultural and ecological development of plateau lakes. The study aimed to investigate the effects of optimizing irrigation and fertilization on N and P losses based on field experiments and density functional theory calculation. The findings showed that ditch irrigation contributes to N and P leaching through their interactions with water and colloids, while drip irrigation reduces the transfer capacity for N and P by decreasing the intensity and volume of leachates. Additionally, changing from conventional fertilization to multiple fertilization based on the nutrient needs of corn significantly improved fertilizer efficiency, resulting in reductions in N and P losses of 25.2–72.4% and 24.2–67.6%, respectively. Additionally, the optimization of irrigation and fertilization led to an 11.3% improvement in crop yield. These results contribute to a better understanding of the mechanisms through which agricultural practices affect nutrient losses and have significant implications for optimizing farmland management in the Erhai Lake basin. Importantly, this research is of great significance in mitigating the threat of agricultural non-point source pollution in ecologically fragile plateau lakes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ditch irrigation contributed to nitrogen leaching via water and colloid interactions.

Treatment
ditch irrigatione0
Outcome
Ne0
Qualifier
interactions with water and colloidse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ditch irrigation contributes to N and P leaching through their interactions with water and colloids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–562 · show in text ↑
e1

“changing from conventional fertilization to multiple fertilization based on the nutrient needs of corn significantly improved fertilizer efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–842 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation reduced nitrogen and phosphorus transfer by reducing leachate intensity and volume.

Treatment
drip irrigatione0
Outcome
transfer capacity for N and Pe0
Qualifier
decreasing the intensity and volume of leachatese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drip irrigation reduces the transfer capacity for N and P by decreasing the intensity and volume of leachates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–679 · show in text ↑
e1

“changing from conventional fertilization to multiple fertilization based on the nutrient needs of corn significantly improved fertilizer efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–842 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Multiple fertilization based on corn nutrient needs improved fertilizer efficiency relative to conventional fertilization.

Treatment
multiple fertilizatione0
Outcome
fertilizer efficiencye0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
conventional fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“changing from conventional fertilization to multiple fertilization based on the nutrient needs of corn significantly improved fertilizer efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–842 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Multiple fertilization reduced nitrogen losses by 25.2–72.4%.

Treatment
multiple fertilizatione1
Outcome
Ne0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
25.2–72.4%e0
Comparator
conventional fertilizatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resulting in reductions in N and P losses of 25.2–72.4% and 24.2–67.6%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–928 · show in text ↑
e1

“changing from conventional fertilization to multiple fertilization based on the nutrient needs of corn significantly improved fertilizer efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–842 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Multiple fertilization reduced phosphorus losses by 24.2–67.6%.

Treatment
multiple fertilizatione1
Outcome
Pe0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
24.2–67.6%e0
Comparator
conventional fertilizatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resulting in reductions in N and P losses of 25.2–72.4% and 24.2–67.6%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–928 · show in text ↑
e1

“changing from conventional fertilization to multiple fertilization based on the nutrient needs of corn significantly improved fertilizer efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–842 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimizing irrigation and fertilization increased crop yield by 11.3%.

Treatment
optimization of irrigation and fertilizatione0
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
11.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the optimization of irrigation and fertilization led to an 11.3% improvement in crop yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1034 · show in text ↑
e1

“changing from conventional fertilization to multiple fertilization based on the nutrient needs of corn significantly improved fertilizer efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–842 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

189 papers: 174 positive, 15 negative or no effect

173 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

185 papers more in this group

See all 189 papers →

irrigation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,016 papers: 791 positive, 225 negative or no effect

790 papers in the same direction as this paper · 209 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1,012 papers more in this group

See all 1,016 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,164 papers: 1,026 positive, 138 negative or no effect

1,025 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,160 papers more in this group

See all 1,164 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.