Paper · 2024 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Assessment of wheat (Triticum aestivum) growth, yield and economics under varying nutrient and weed management options

ANKUR BHAKAR; Y.V. SINGH; KAPILA SHEKHAWAT; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out during rabi seasons of 2020–21 and 2021–22 at research farm of ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, to study the effect of nutrient and weed management on crop growth, yield and economics of wheat. Experiment was carried out in factorial randomized complete block design and replicated thrice. First factor, nutrient management comprised of three levels viz., control, 100% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) and 75% RDF + biofertilizer (BF) consortia and second factor weed management comprised of five levels viz. weedy check, Sulfosulfuron 75% + Metsulfuron 5% WG @40 g/ha (ready mix) at 28-30 DAS of wheat, hand weeding at 45 DAS + Sulfosulfuron 75% + Metsulfuron 5% WG) @40 g/ha (ready mix) at 28-30 DAS, mulch + hand weeding at 45 DAS and weed free check. Crop growth, yield attributes and grain yield (4.63 and 4.48 t/ha) of wheat were recorded higher under 100% RDF and these were at par with 75% RDF + BF and the lowest growth and yield was reported under control. The plant growth, yield attributes, grain and straw yield were highest under weed free check and those were at par with hand weeding + sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron and sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron. Gross returns were significantly higher with 100% RDF over 75% RDF + BF and control but net returns and B: C with 100% RDF were at par with 75% RDF + BF over control. Significantly higher net returns and B:C was obtained with Sulf + Mets and HW + Sulf + Mets. It was concluded that 75 % RDF + biofertilizer consortia application in along with Sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron ready mix use met the nutrition and weed management requirement in wheat and gave higher growth, productivity and profitability of the crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full recommended fertilizer raised crop growth and yield attributes relative to control, and was at par with 75% RDF plus biofertilizer.

Treatment
100% RDFe0
Outcome
Crop growth, yield attributese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“Crop growth, yield attributes and grain yield (4.63 and 4.48 t/ha) of wheat were recorded higher under 100% RDF and these were at par with 75% RDF + BF and the lowest growth and yield was reported under control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–1028 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full recommended fertilizer gave higher grain yield, reported as 4.63 and 4.48 t/ha, than control.

Treatment
100% RDFe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
4.63 and 4.48 t/hae0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“grain yield (4.63 and 4.48 t/ha) of wheat were recorded higher under 100% RDF and these were at par with 75% RDF + BF and the lowest growth and yield was reported under control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–1028 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free treatment produced the highest plant growth and yield attributes.

Treatment
weed free checke0
Outcome
plant growth, yield attributese0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
hand weeding + sulfosulfuron + metsulfurone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“The plant growth, yield attributes, grain and straw yield were highest under weed free check and those were at par with hand weeding + sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron and sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1224 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free treatment produced the highest grain and straw yields.

Treatment
weed free checke0
Outcome
grain and straw yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
sulfosulfuron + metsulfurone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“The plant growth, yield attributes, grain and straw yield were highest under weed free check and those were at par with hand weeding + sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron and sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1224 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Full recommended fertilizer gave significantly higher gross returns than 75% RDF plus biofertilizer and control.

Treatment
100% RDFe0
Outcome
Gross returnse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
75% RDF + BF and controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“Gross returns were significantly higher with 100% RDF over 75% RDF + BF and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1309 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net returns and benefit-cost ratio under full RDF were at par with 75% RDF plus biofertilizer and above control.

Treatment
100% RDFe0
Outcome
net returns and B: Ce0
Direction
at pare0
Comparator
75% RDF + BFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“net returns and B: C with 100% RDF were at par with 75% RDF + BF over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1391 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron plus metsulfuron gave significantly higher net returns and benefit-cost ratio.

Treatment
Sulf + Metse0
Outcome
net returns and B:Ce0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“Significantly higher net returns and B:C was obtained with Sulf + Mets and HW + Sulf + Mets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1484 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding plus sulfosulfuron and metsulfuron gave significantly higher net returns and benefit-cost ratio.

Treatment
HW + Sulf + Metse0
Outcome
net returns and B:Ce0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“Significantly higher net returns and B:C was obtained with Sulf + Mets and HW + Sulf + Mets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1484 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that 75% RDF plus biofertilizer with sulfosulfuron and metsulfuron meets wheat nutrition and weed management needs and raises growth, productivity and profitability.

Outcome
nutrition and weed management requiremente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“75 % RDF + biofertilizer consortia application in along with Sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron ready mix use met the nutrition and weed management requirement in wheat and gave higher growth, productivity and profitability of the crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1508–1736 · show in text ↑

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

559 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.