Paper · 2024 · Journal of the Kenya National Commission for UNESCO

Effect of P-K Fertilizer Rate and Fruit Canopy Position on Fruit Quality and Vitamins of Mangifera Indica Cv. 'Kent'

Kennedy Olale

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Mango production in Kenya is hindered by poor fruit quality and imbalanced fertilizer application, hence the need to investigate the long-term effects of different fertilizer regimes on nutrient cycling, and overall mango orchard sustainability. This study aimed to determine the effects of phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) fertilizers, as well as fruit canopy position, on the nutritional content and morphological characteristics of 'Kent' mango fruits. Seven treatments, P1kg, K1kg, P2kg, K2kg, PK1kg, PK2kg, and control, were repeated five times, resulting in 35 test trees of the "Kent" cultivar, aged 7-8 years. The results indicated that increasing P application significantly boosted β-carotene levels (p ≤ 0.05), while ascorbic acid levels were reduced. However, both β-carotene and α-tocopherol levels were higher in control trees compared to fertilized trees, regardless of the fertilizer type or rate. A weak negative correlation between ascorbic acid and α-tocopherol was observed (r=-0.48, P≤0.05), suggesting a potential trade-off between these two antioxidants. Additionally, fruit weight was strongly correlated with skin weight, stone thickness, and seed thickness. Fruits from within the canopy generally exhibited higher levels of antioxidants than those exposed to direct sunlight. The study provides valuable insights into the influence of P and K fertilizers and canopy position on mango fruit quality. However, further research is needed to optimize fertilizer management practices for sustainable mango production in Kenya.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing P application significantly boosted beta-carotene levels in Kent mango fruit.

Treatment
increasing P applicatione1
Outcome
β-carotene levelse1
Direction
boostede1
Qualifier
p ≤ 0.05e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the nutritional content and morphological characteristics of 'Kent' mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–454 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results indicated that increasing P application significantly boosted β-carotene levels (p ≤ 0.05), while ascorbic acid levels were reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–761 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing P application reduced ascorbic acid levels in Kent mango fruit.

Treatment
increasing P applicatione1
Outcome
ascorbic acid levelse1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the nutritional content and morphological characteristics of 'Kent' mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–454 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results indicated that increasing P application significantly boosted β-carotene levels (p ≤ 0.05), while ascorbic acid levels were reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–761 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beta-carotene and alpha-tocopherol levels were higher in control trees than in fertilized trees, regardless of fertilizer type or rate.

Treatment
fertilizer type or ratee2
Outcome
β-carotene and α-tocopherol levelse2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
control treese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the nutritional content and morphological characteristics of 'Kent' mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–454 · show in text ↑
e2

“both β-carotene and α-tocopherol levels were higher in control trees compared to fertilized trees, regardless of the fertilizer type or rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–912 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A weak negative correlation existed between ascorbic acid and alpha-tocopherol in mango fruit.

Compound
ascorbic acide3
Outcome
correlation between ascorbic acid and α-tocopherole3
Direction
negativee3
Value
r=-0.48e3
Qualifier
weake3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the nutritional content and morphological characteristics of 'Kent' mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–454 · show in text ↑
e3

“A weak negative correlation between ascorbic acid and α-tocopherol was observed (r=-0.48, P≤0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1011 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit weight was strongly correlated with skin weight, stone thickness and seed thickness in mango.

Treatment
skin weight, stone thickness, and seed thicknesse4
Outcome
fruit weighte4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the nutritional content and morphological characteristics of 'Kent' mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–454 · show in text ↑
e4

“fruit weight was strongly correlated with skin weight, stone thickness, and seed thickness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1182 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruits from within the canopy had higher antioxidant levels than fruits exposed to direct sunlight.

Organ / stage
Fruitse5
Treatment
within the canopye5
Outcome
levels of antioxidantse5
Direction
highere5
Comparator
those exposed to direct sunlighte5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the nutritional content and morphological characteristics of 'Kent' mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–454 · show in text ↑
e5

“Fruits from within the canopy generally exhibited higher levels of antioxidants than those exposed to direct sunlight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1301 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · quality: phytochemicals · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

phosphorus · molecular: metabolites · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.