Paper · 2025 · Land Degradation and Development

Effects of Mountain Microorganisms on the Growth and Development of the Bean Crop (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) in the Municipality of Caldono, Cauca, Colombia

Efrén Venancio Ramos Cabrera; Yineth Camila Pabón Mondragón; Britney Gisell Yotengo Vargas; et al.

3
claims
9
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Bean monoculture deteriorates soil fertility, decreases organic matter, reduces microbial diversity, and accelerates erosion, depleting nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus. This leads to dependence on chemical fertilizers and pesticides, increasing environmental pollution. A viable solution is mountain microorganisms, improving nutrient availability, disease resistance, environmental stress, and soil structure. However, there is a knowledge gap regarding their specific efficacy in supporting the growth and development of common beans ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under specific agroecological conditions. This research aims to help fill this knowledge gap, so in the Municipality of Caldono, Cauca, Colombia, the effect of mountain microorganisms was evaluated in about 900 seeds of Phaseolus vulgaris L . variety Cargamanto. A randomized complete block design with three treatments was used: T0 (control, no inoculation), T1 (inoculation with mountain microorganisms for 1 h), and T2 (inoculation with mountain microorganisms for 3 h). Growth parameters such as plant height, number of nodules, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, dry weight, and grain yield per hectare were evaluated. The results suggest that inoculation with mountain microorganisms significantly improved all measured parameters compared to the control samples. T2 consistently outperformed T1, indicating that more extended inoculation periods increase the efficacy of the parameters evaluated. These results suggest that applying mountain microorganisms is a promising and sustainable approach to improve bean productivity, which could reduce dependence on chemical fertilizers and promote more environmentally friendly agricultural practices. Thus, the study provides valuable information on mountain microorganisms as a biotechnological alternative to improve crop yield and soil health in bean monoculture systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mountain microorganism inoculation significantly improved all measured bean growth and yield parameters versus controls.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris LPhaseolus vulgarise2
Material
Cargamantoe2
Treatment
inoculation with mountain microorganismse0
Interactor
mountain microorganismse0symbiont
Outcome
plant height, number of nodules, number of pods per plante1
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
control samplese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results suggest that inoculation with mountain microorganisms significantly improved all measured parameters compared to the control samples.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1365 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant height, number of nodules, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, dry weight, and grain yield per hectare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1203 · show in text ↑
e2

“Phaseolus vulgaris L . variety Cargamanto”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mountain microorganism inoculation improved bean seed number, dry weight and grain yield versus controls.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris LPhaseolus vulgarise2
Material
Cargamantoe2
Treatment
inoculation with mountain microorganismse0
Interactor
mountain microorganismse0symbiont
Outcome
number of seeds per pod, dry weight, and grain yield per hectaree1
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
control samplese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results suggest that inoculation with mountain microorganisms significantly improved all measured parameters compared to the control samples.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1365 · show in text ↑
e1

“number of seeds per pod, dry weight, and grain yield per hectare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1203 · show in text ↑
e2

“Phaseolus vulgaris L . variety Cargamanto”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three-hour inoculation consistently outperformed one-hour inoculation.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris LPhaseolus vulgarise2
Treatment
inoculation with mountain microorganisms for 3 he1
Interactor
mountain microorganismse1symbiont
Outcome
parameters evaluatede0
Direction
outperformede0
Comparator
inoculation with mountain microorganisms for 1 he1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T2 consistently outperformed T1, indicating that more extended inoculation periods increase the efficacy of the parameters evaluated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1366–1499 · show in text ↑
e1

“T1 (inoculation with mountain microorganisms for 1 h), and T2 (inoculation with mountain microorganisms for 3 h)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1052 · show in text ↑
e2

“Phaseolus vulgaris L . variety Cargamanto”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–841 · show in text ↑

inoculation · symbiosis · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

90 papers: 83 positive, 7 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

195 papers: 153 positive, 42 negative or no effect

152 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

191 papers more in this group

See all 195 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.