Abstract
We evaluated the effect of combined Rhizobium tropici, Trichoderma asperellum and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) in beans crop. The hypothesis that strains of T. asperullum, R. tropici and PGPR combined could improve growth, biomass accumulation and beans yield was tested under greenhouse and field conditions. The treatments consisted of control, mineral nitrogen application and inoculation, isolated and associated with the following microorganisms: Rhizobium tropici, Bacillus subtilis, Trichoderma asperellum and Burkholderia sp. 10N6. Results were evaluated by shoot dry weight (SDW) and root dry weight (RDW), number of nodules and yield components. In greenhouse environment all the microorganisms behaved similarly, and the treatments inoculated with Burkholderia sp. 10N6 (IBu) and R. tropici (IR) stood out regarding the production components. In field conditions the treatments IR and IRTBa presented the highest values of SDW and RDW. Our results suggest that inoculation with R. tropici, T. asperellum and PGPR may promote beans growth and bring benefits to shoot and root accumulation, increase the number of nodules as well as improve yield components, contributing to a sustainable agriculture.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
In greenhouse, tested microorganisms behaved similarly.
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e0“In greenhouse environment all the microorganisms behaved similarly”
t0“Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Burkholderia sp. 10N6 inoculation stood out for production components in greenhouse.
- Taxon
- Beanst0
- Treatment
- inoculated with Burkholderia sp. 10N6e0
- Interactor
- Burkholderia sp. 10N6e0symbiont
- Outcome
- production componentse0
- Direction
- stood oute0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“treatments inoculated with Burkholderia sp. 10N6 (IBu) and R. tropici (IR) stood out regarding the production components”
t0“Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
R. tropici inoculation stood out for production components in greenhouse.
- Taxon
- Beanst0
- Treatment
- inoculated with Burkholderia sp. 10N6 (IBu) and R. tropicie0
- Interactor
- R. tropici
Martinezella tropicie0symbiont - Outcome
- production componentse0
- Direction
- stood oute0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“treatments inoculated with Burkholderia sp. 10N6 (IBu) and R. tropici (IR) stood out regarding the production components”
t0“Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
In field conditions IR had highest shoot and root dry weight.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“In field conditions the treatments IR and IRTBa presented the highest values of SDW and RDW”
t0“Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
In field conditions IRTBa had highest shoot and root dry weight.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“In field conditions the treatments IR and IRTBa presented the highest values of SDW and RDW”
t0“Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Authors suggest combined microbial inoculation may promote bean growth, nodulation and yield components.
Verbatim
e0“inoculation with R. tropici, T. asperellum and PGPR may promote beans growth and bring benefits to shoot and root accumulation, increase the number of nodules as well as improve yield components”
The same questions in other papers
Martinezella tropici · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
152 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
191 papers more in this group
See all 195 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.