Paper · 2024 · Journal of the Indian Society of Coastal Agricultural Research

Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management with Recycling of Crop Biomass on Yield of Coconut Based Cropping System in East Coast Region of Andhra Pradesh

A. KIREETI; B. V. K. BHAGAVAN; G. RAMANANDAM; et al.

13
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

An experiment was conducted during 2014-2020 at the Horticultural Research Station, Dr. YSRHU, Ambajipeta, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Konaseema district, Andhra Pradesh, to evaluate the impact of integrated nutrient management (INM) on the productivity of coconut and intercrops in a coconut-based cropping system (CBCS), as well as on soil fertility and plant nutrient content. The treatments were T1 - 75% of Recommended NPK (RDF) + vermicompost, T2 - 50% of RDF + vermicompost + vermiwash + biofertilizer + in situ green manuring, T3 - Fully organic: Vermicompost + vermiwash + biofertilizer + in situ green manuring + green leaf manuring (Gliricidia) + composted coir pith + mulching with coconut leaves, T4 - 100% RDF with mono cropping of coconut. Among the treatments, T1 (75% RDF + vermicompost) recorded the maximum yields of coconut (157.34 nuts palms-1 and 27848 nuts ha-1), cocoa (2.6 kg plant-1), banana (12.68 kg plant-1), elephant foot yam (2.48 kg plant-1), and pineapple (0.903 kg plant-1). This treatment also recorded the highest benefit-cost ratio of 3.22. Integrated nutrient management practices significantly improved coconut yield (by 15-20%), intercrop productivity, net returns (by 2.5 times), soil organic carbon (1.2%), soil moisture content (2%) and the population of beneficial soil micro-organisms. Based on the results, the application of 75% of RDF + vermicompost (prepared from biomass within CBCS) is recommended for sustainable cultivation in coconut-based cropping systems. This ensures enhanced yields and profitability while maintaining soil health.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T1 (75% RDF + vermicompost) recorded the maximum coconut yield of 157.34 nuts per palm.

Taxon
coconute2
Treatment
75% RDF + vermicomposte2
Outcome
yields of coconute2
Direction
maximume2
Value
157.34 nuts palms-1e2
Setting
Ambajipetae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Horticultural Research Station, Dr. YSRHU, Ambajipeta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 52–105 · show in text ↑
e2

“T1 (75% RDF + vermicompost) recorded the maximum yields of coconut (157.34 nuts palms-1 and 27848 nuts ha-1), cocoa (2.6 kg plant-1), banana (12.68 kg plant-1), elephant foot yam (2.48 kg plant-1), and pineapple (0.903 kg plant-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–997 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T1 (75% RDF + vermicompost) recorded the maximum cocoa yield of 2.6 kg per plant.

Treatment
75% RDF + vermicomposte2
Outcome
yieldse2
Direction
maximume2
Value
2.6 kg plant-1e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“T1 (75% RDF + vermicompost) recorded the maximum yields of coconut (157.34 nuts palms-1 and 27848 nuts ha-1), cocoa (2.6 kg plant-1), banana (12.68 kg plant-1), elephant foot yam (2.48 kg plant-1), and pineapple (0.903 kg plant-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–997 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T1 (75% RDF + vermicompost) recorded the maximum banana yield of 12.68 kg per plant.

Taxon
bananae2
Treatment
75% RDF + vermicomposte2
Outcome
yieldse2
Direction
maximume2
Value
12.68 kg plant-1e2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2

“T1 (75% RDF + vermicompost) recorded the maximum yields of coconut (157.34 nuts palms-1 and 27848 nuts ha-1), cocoa (2.6 kg plant-1), banana (12.68 kg plant-1), elephant foot yam (2.48 kg plant-1), and pineapple (0.903 kg plant-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–997 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T1 (75% RDF + vermicompost) recorded the maximum elephant foot yam yield of 2.48 kg per plant.

Taxon
elephant foot yame2
Treatment
75% RDF + vermicomposte2
Outcome
yieldse2
Direction
maximume2
Value
2.48 kg plant-1e2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2

“T1 (75% RDF + vermicompost) recorded the maximum yields of coconut (157.34 nuts palms-1 and 27848 nuts ha-1), cocoa (2.6 kg plant-1), banana (12.68 kg plant-1), elephant foot yam (2.48 kg plant-1), and pineapple (0.903 kg plant-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–997 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T1 (75% RDF + vermicompost) recorded the maximum pineapple yield of 0.903 kg per plant.

Taxon
pineappleAnanas comosuse2
Treatment
75% RDF + vermicomposte2
Outcome
yieldse2
Direction
maximume2
Value
0.903 kg plant-1e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ananas comosus
Ananas comosus · TaxonVpuipV ,pemegang hak cipta · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“T1 (75% RDF + vermicompost) recorded the maximum yields of coconut (157.34 nuts palms-1 and 27848 nuts ha-1), cocoa (2.6 kg plant-1), banana (12.68 kg plant-1), elephant foot yam (2.48 kg plant-1), and pineapple (0.903 kg plant-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–997 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T1 (75% RDF + vermicompost) had the highest benefit-cost ratio, 3.22.

Taxon
coconute2
Treatment
75% RDF + vermicomposte2
Outcome
benefit-cost ratioe3
Direction
higheste3
Value
3.22e3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2

“T1 (75% RDF + vermicompost) recorded the maximum yields of coconut (157.34 nuts palms-1 and 27848 nuts ha-1), cocoa (2.6 kg plant-1), banana (12.68 kg plant-1), elephant foot yam (2.48 kg plant-1), and pineapple (0.903 kg plant-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–997 · show in text ↑
e3

“This treatment also recorded the highest benefit-cost ratio of 3.22”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1066 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management significantly improved coconut yield by 15-20%.

Taxon
coconute4
Treatment
Integrated nutrient management practicese4
Outcome
coconut yielde4
Direction
improvede4
Value
15-20%e4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e4

“Integrated nutrient management practices significantly improved coconut yield (by 15-20%), intercrop productivity, net returns (by 2.5 times), soil organic carbon (1.2%), soil moisture content (2%) and the population of beneficial soil micro-organisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1319 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management significantly improved intercrop productivity.

Taxon
coconute4
Treatment
Integrated nutrient management practicese4
Outcome
intercrop productivitye4
Direction
improvede4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e4

“Integrated nutrient management practices significantly improved coconut yield (by 15-20%), intercrop productivity, net returns (by 2.5 times), soil organic carbon (1.2%), soil moisture content (2%) and the population of beneficial soil micro-organisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1319 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management significantly improved net returns by 2.5 times.

Taxon
coconute4
Treatment
Integrated nutrient management practicese4
Outcome
net returnse4
Direction
improvede4
Value
2.5 timese4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e4

“Integrated nutrient management practices significantly improved coconut yield (by 15-20%), intercrop productivity, net returns (by 2.5 times), soil organic carbon (1.2%), soil moisture content (2%) and the population of beneficial soil micro-organisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1319 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management significantly improved soil organic carbon by 1.2%.

Taxon
coconute4
Treatment
Integrated nutrient management practicese4
Outcome
soil organic carbone4
Direction
improvede4
Value
1.2%e4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e4

“Integrated nutrient management practices significantly improved coconut yield (by 15-20%), intercrop productivity, net returns (by 2.5 times), soil organic carbon (1.2%), soil moisture content (2%) and the population of beneficial soil micro-organisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1319 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management significantly improved soil moisture content by 2%.

Taxon
coconute4
Treatment
Integrated nutrient management practicese4
Outcome
soil moisture contente4
Direction
improvede4
Value
2%e4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e4

“Integrated nutrient management practices significantly improved coconut yield (by 15-20%), intercrop productivity, net returns (by 2.5 times), soil organic carbon (1.2%), soil moisture content (2%) and the population of beneficial soil micro-organisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1319 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management significantly improved the population of beneficial soil micro-organisms.

Taxon
coconute4
Treatment
Integrated nutrient management practicese4
Outcome
the population of beneficial soil micro-organismse4
Direction
improvede4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e4

“Integrated nutrient management practices significantly improved coconut yield (by 15-20%), intercrop productivity, net returns (by 2.5 times), soil organic carbon (1.2%), soil moisture content (2%) and the population of beneficial soil micro-organisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1319 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 75% of RDF plus vermicompost for sustainable cultivation in coconut-based cropping systems.

Taxon
coconut-based cropping systemse5
Outcome
75% of RDF + vermicomposte5

Verbatim

e5

“the application of 75% of RDF + vermicompost (prepared from biomass within CBCS) is recommended for sustainable cultivation in coconut-based cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1500 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Ananas comosus (pineapple)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 27 positive, 7 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

fertilization · yield · Theobroma cacao (cocoa)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 36 positive, 6 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

fertilization · yield · MusaPositive and negative results

128 papers: 118 positive, 10 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

124 papers more in this group

See all 128 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Cocos nucifera (coconut palm)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Cocos nucifera (coconut palm)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · pest · Cocos nucifera (coconut palm)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cocos nucifera (coconut palm)Results agree

19 papers: 19 positive, 0 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.