Paper · 2015 · Madras Agricultural Journal

Role of Border and Barrier Crops for the Management of Important Chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) Pests.

Sujay Y H; Giraddi R S; Basavana Goud K.

8
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted during kharif 2010-11 and 2011-12 at Agricultural Research Station, UAS, Dharwad, Karnataka, South India to assess the effect of border and barrier cropping for the management of chilli pests. Chilli as border and barrier crop with South African tall maize and sweet sorghum was found to be superior over sole crop by recording the lowest population of sucking pests, leaf curl index, larval population of H. armigera, fruit damage and significantly higher growth parameters as well as dry chili yield (3.95 and 3.89q/ha) with a net return of Rs 19,528/- and CB ratio 1 2.56. Activity of predators such as coccinellids and chrysopids were found to be greatly distributed in plots having border and barrier crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Border and barrier cropping recorded the lowest sucking pest population and leaf curl index relative to sole cropping.

Taxon
Chillie0
Treatment
border and barrier crop with South African tall maize and sweet sorghume0
Interactor
sucking pestse0pest
Outcome
population of sucking pests, leaf curl indexe0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
sole crope0
Setting
Agricultural Research Station, UAS, Dharwad, Karnataka, South Indiae1

Verbatim

e0

“Chilli as border and barrier crop with South African tall maize and sweet sorghum was found to be superior over sole crop by recording the lowest population of sucking pests, leaf curl index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–416 · show in text ↑
e1

“Agricultural Research Station, UAS, Dharwad, Karnataka, South India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 70–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Border and barrier cropping recorded the lowest H. armigera larval population and fruit damage.

Taxon
Chillie0
Treatment
border and barrier crop with South African tall maize and sweet sorghume0
Interactor
H. armigerae0pest
Outcome
larval population of H. armigera, fruit damagee0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
sole crope0

Verbatim

e0

“Chilli as border and barrier crop with South African tall maize and sweet sorghum was found to be superior over sole crop by recording the lowest population of sucking pests, leaf curl index, larval population of H. armigera, fruit damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–464 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Border and barrier cropping significantly increased chilli growth parameters.

Taxon
Chillie0
Treatment
border and barrier crop with South African tall maize and sweet sorghume0
Outcome
growth parameterse1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
sole crope0

Verbatim

e0

“Chilli as border and barrier crop with South African tall maize and sweet sorghum was found to be superior over sole crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–347 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly higher growth parameters as well as dry chili yield (3.95 and 3.89q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–554 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Border and barrier cropping significantly increased dry chilli yield to 3.95 and 3.89q/ha.

Taxon
Chillie0
Treatment
border and barrier crop with South African tall maize and sweet sorghume0
Outcome
dry chili yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
3.95 and 3.89q/hae1
Comparator
sole crope0

Verbatim

e0

“Chilli as border and barrier crop with South African tall maize and sweet sorghum was found to be superior over sole crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–347 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly higher growth parameters as well as dry chili yield (3.95 and 3.89q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–554 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Border and barrier cropping yielded a net return of Rs 19,528/-.

Outcome
net returne0
Value
Rs 19,528/-e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“with a net return of Rs 19,528/- and CB ratio 1 2.56.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–608 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Border and barrier cropping had a CB ratio reported as 1 2.56.

Outcome
CB ratioe0
Value
1 2.56e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“with a net return of Rs 19,528/- and CB ratio 1 2.56.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–608 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coccinellid predator activity was greatly distributed in border and barrier crop plots.

Taxon
coccinellidse0
Outcome
Activitye0
Qualifier
greatly distributed in plots having border and barrier cropse0

Verbatim

e0

“Activity of predators such as coccinellids and chrysopids were found to be greatly distributed in plots having border and barrier crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–745 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chrysopid predator activity was greatly distributed in border and barrier crop plots.

Taxon
chrysopidse0
Outcome
Activitye0
Qualifier
greatly distributed in plots having border and barrier cropse0

Verbatim

e0

“Activity of predators such as coccinellids and chrysopids were found to be greatly distributed in plots having border and barrier crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–745 · show in text ↑

Zea mays · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Zea mays · disease · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

trap barrier · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

trap barrier · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

trap barrier · pest · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

trap barrier · disease · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.