Paper · 2025 · Agronomy

Study on Alfalfa Water Use Efficiency and Optimal Irrigation Strategy in Agro-Pastoral Ecotone, Northwestern China

Xiangyang Miao; Guoshuai Wang; Bing Xu; et al.

15
claims
32
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Agro-pastoral ecotone is an important livestock production area in the north of China, and alfalfa is the main pasture crop in this area. Aiming to address the issues of groundwater overexploitation in the area with water demand, we assessed the consumption pattern, irrigation scheduling, and water usage efficiency of alfalfa under subsurface drip irrigation. Alfalfa was used as the research object in this study. A DSSAT model was used to simulate the soil moisture, yield, and other alfalfa grow characteristics during a two-year in situ observation study and provide information on the best irrigation techniques and the water-use efficiency of alfalfa in the agro-pastoral ecotone of Northwestern China. The results showed that the ARE, nRMSE, and R2 values of the alfalfa soil water content, leaf area index, and yield varied between 3.82% and 5.57%, 4.81% and 8.06%, and 0.86 and 0.93, respectively, the accuracy of the calibrated and validated parameters were acceptable, and the model could be applied to this study. The water consumption of alfalfa ranged from 395.6 mm to 421.8 mm during the whole year, and the critical water consumption period was the branching stage and the bud stage. During the branching stage and the bud stage, water consumption was 30–31% and 31–33% of the total water consumption, and the water consumption intensity averaged 2.97–3.04 mm/d and 4.23–4.97 mm/d. The variations of WUE and IWUE were 11.74–14.39 kg·m−3 and 7.12–9.31 kg·m−3. Irrigation increased the water productivity of rain-fed alfalfa by 49.48–64.70% and increased the yield of alfalfa by 17.87–34.72%. With the highest yield as the goal, the recommended irrigation volumes for normal and dry flow years were 200 mm and 240 mm; with the goal of the highest utilization of groundwater resources, the recommended irrigation volumes for normal and dry flow years were 160 mm and 192 mm. The results of this study are expected to provide scientific and technological support for the rational utilization of groundwater and the scientific improvement of alfalfa yields in the agro-pastoral ecotone of Northwestern China.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The DSSAT model accuracy for alfalfa ARE ranged between 3.82% and 5.57%.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Outcome
AREe0
Value
3.82% and 5.57%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa Water Use Efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“the ARE, nRMSE, and R2 values of the alfalfa soil water content, leaf area index, and yield varied between 3.82% and 5.57%, 4.81% and 8.06%, and 0.86 and 0.93, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–907 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The DSSAT model accuracy for alfalfa nRMSE ranged between 4.81% and 8.06%.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Outcome
nRMSEe0
Value
4.81% and 8.06%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa Water Use Efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“the ARE, nRMSE, and R2 values of the alfalfa soil water content, leaf area index, and yield varied between 3.82% and 5.57%, 4.81% and 8.06%, and 0.86 and 0.93, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–907 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The DSSAT model fit for alfalfa, R2, ranged between 0.86 and 0.93.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Outcome
R2e0
Value
0.86 and 0.93e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa Water Use Efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“the ARE, nRMSE, and R2 values of the alfalfa soil water content, leaf area index, and yield varied between 3.82% and 5.57%, 4.81% and 8.06%, and 0.86 and 0.93, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–907 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Alfalfa consumed 395.6 mm to 421.8 mm of water over the whole year.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Outcome
water consumptione1
Value
395.6 mm to 421.8 mme1
Qualifier
during the whole yeare1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa Water Use Efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–37 · show in text ↑
e1

“The water consumption of alfalfa ranged from 395.6 mm to 421.8 mm during the whole year, and the critical water consumption period was the branching stage and the bud stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1200 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The critical water consumption period of alfalfa was the branching stage and the bud stage.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Organ / stage
branching stage and the bud stagee1
Outcome
critical water consumption periode1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa Water Use Efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–37 · show in text ↑
e1

“The water consumption of alfalfa ranged from 395.6 mm to 421.8 mm during the whole year, and the critical water consumption period was the branching stage and the bud stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1200 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

During the branching stage, alfalfa water consumption was 30–31% of the total.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Organ / stage
branching stagee2
Outcome
water consumptione2
Value
30–31%e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa Water Use Efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–37 · show in text ↑
e2

“During the branching stage and the bud stage, water consumption was 30–31% and 31–33% of the total water consumption”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1318 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

During the bud stage, alfalfa water consumption was 31–33% of the total.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Organ / stage
bud stagee2
Outcome
water consumptione2
Value
31–33%e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa Water Use Efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–37 · show in text ↑
e2

“During the branching stage and the bud stage, water consumption was 30–31% and 31–33% of the total water consumption”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1318 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The water consumption intensity during the branching stage averaged 2.97–3.04 mm/d.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Organ / stage
branching stagee2
Outcome
water consumption intensitye3
Value
2.97–3.04 mm/de3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa Water Use Efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–37 · show in text ↑
e2

“During the branching stage and the bud stage, water consumption was 30–31% and 31–33% of the total water consumption”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1318 · show in text ↑
e3

“the water consumption intensity averaged 2.97–3.04 mm/d and 4.23–4.97 mm/d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1398 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The water consumption intensity during the bud stage averaged 4.23–4.97 mm/d.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Organ / stage
bud stagee2
Outcome
water consumption intensitye3
Value
4.23–4.97 mm/de3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa Water Use Efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–37 · show in text ↑
e2

“During the branching stage and the bud stage, water consumption was 30–31% and 31–33% of the total water consumption”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1318 · show in text ↑
e3

“the water consumption intensity averaged 2.97–3.04 mm/d and 4.23–4.97 mm/d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1398 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water use efficiency (WUE) of alfalfa ranged from 11.74 to 14.39 kg·m−3.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Outcome
WUEe4
Value
11.74–14.39 kg·m−3e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa Water Use Efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–37 · show in text ↑
e4

“The variations of WUE and IWUE were 11.74–14.39 kg·m−3 and 7.12–9.31 kg·m−3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1475 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) of alfalfa ranged from 7.12 to 9.31 kg·m−3.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Outcome
IWUEe4
Value
7.12–9.31 kg·m−3e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa Water Use Efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–37 · show in text ↑
e4

“The variations of WUE and IWUE were 11.74–14.39 kg·m−3 and 7.12–9.31 kg·m−3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1475 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased water productivity of rain-fed alfalfa by 49.48–64.70%.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
Irrigatione5
Outcome
water productivitye5
Direction
increasede5
Value
49.48–64.70%e5
Comparator
rain-fed alfalfae5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa Water Use Efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–37 · show in text ↑
e5

“Irrigation increased the water productivity of rain-fed alfalfa by 49.48–64.70% and increased the yield of alfalfa by 17.87–34.72%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1477–1607 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased alfalfa yield by 17.87–34.72% relative to rain-fed alfalfa.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
Irrigatione5
Outcome
yielde5
Direction
increasede5
Value
17.87–34.72%e5
Comparator
rain-fed alfalfae5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa Water Use Efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–37 · show in text ↑
e5

“Irrigation increased the water productivity of rain-fed alfalfa by 49.48–64.70% and increased the yield of alfalfa by 17.87–34.72%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1477–1607 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

For the highest yield in normal and dry flow years, the recommended irrigation volumes for alfalfa are 200 mm and 240 mm.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Outcome
recommended irrigation volumese6
Value
200 mm and 240 mme6
Qualifier
With the highest yield as the goale6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa Water Use Efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–37 · show in text ↑
e6

“With the highest yield as the goal, the recommended irrigation volumes for normal and dry flow years were 200 mm and 240 mm; with the goal of the highest utilization of groundwater resources, the recommended irrigation volumes for normal and dry flow years were 160 mm and 192 mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1609–1888 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

For the highest groundwater utilization in normal and dry flow years, the recommended irrigation volumes for alfalfa are 160 mm and 192 mm.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Outcome
recommended irrigation volumese6
Value
160 mm and 192 mme6
Qualifier
with the goal of the highest utilization of groundwater resourcese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa Water Use Efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–37 · show in text ↑
e6

“With the highest yield as the goal, the recommended irrigation volumes for normal and dry flow years were 200 mm and 240 mm; with the goal of the highest utilization of groundwater resources, the recommended irrigation volumes for normal and dry flow years were 160 mm and 192 mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1609–1888 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ

92 papers: 66 positive, 26 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

88 papers more in this group

See all 92 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 25 positive, 8 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.