Paper · 2025 · BIO Web of Conferences

Influence of plant density and biological products on the formation of seed yield of maize lines under irrigation conditions

Tetiana Marchenko; Olena Piliarska; Dilfuza Kiyamova; et al.

10
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Treatment with biological products resulted in an increase in the area of the assimilation apparatus by 1.7 to 2.4 thousand m²/ha.The application of Bio-gel led to an increase in leaf surface by 1.7 thousand m 2 /ha or 5.3%, and the treatment with Helafit combi by 2.4 thousand m 2 /ha or 7.5%. The treatment with biological products contributed to an increase in photosynthetic potential by 5.1% compared to the treatment with Bio- gel and by 7.2% compared to the treatment with Helafit combi. It was found that the treatment of parental lines with Bio-gel and Helafit combi caused an increase in laboratory germination of seeds. When using Bio-gel, the laboratory germination rate increased by an average of 1.5%. The treatment with Helafit combi was more effective, as the germination rate in this experimental variant increased by 2.4%. The increase in laboratory germination was observed due to a decrease in the infection of seeds of the lines by Fusarium moniliforme Scheld. The maximum seed yield in the early maturing line - the parent component of DK 281 was recorded at a density of 90 thousand plants/ha and treatment with Helafit combi - 3.65 t/ha. The maximum yield in the line - the parent component of DK 247 was observed at a density of 80 thousand plants/ha and treatment with Helafit combi - 4.89 t/ha. The medium-late line - the parent component DK 411 showed the highest yield at a density of 70 thousand plants/ha and treatment with Helafit combi - 4.65 t/ha. The maximum yield in the experiment was observed in the line

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-gel increased leaf surface by 1.7 thousand m²/ha, or 5.3%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Bio-gele0
Outcome
leaf surfacee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
1.7 thousand m 2 /hae0
Qualifier
5.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of Bio-gel led to an increase in leaf surface by 1.7 thousand m 2 /ha or 5.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–223 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Helafit combi increased leaf surface by 2.4 thousand m²/ha, or 7.5%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Helafit combie0
Outcome
leaf surfacee1
Direction
increasee1
Value
2.4 thousand m 2 /hae0
Qualifier
7.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment with Helafit combi by 2.4 thousand m 2 /ha or 7.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–293 · show in text ↑
e1

“increase in leaf surface”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–191 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic potential increased by 5.1% compared to the Bio-gel treatment.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
photosynthetic potentiale0
Direction
increasee0
Value
5.1%e0
Comparator
Bio- gele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increase in photosynthetic potential by 5.1% compared to the treatment with Bio- gel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–436 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic potential increased by 7.2% compared to the Helafit combi treatment.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
photosynthetic potentiale1
Direction
increasee1
Value
7.2%e0
Comparator
Helafit combie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“by 7.2% compared to the treatment with Helafit combi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–493 · show in text ↑
e1

“increase in photosynthetic potential”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–388 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-gel increased laboratory seed germination by an average of 1.5%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Bio-gele0
Outcome
laboratory germination ratee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When using Bio-gel, the laboratory germination rate increased by an average of 1.5%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–715 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Helafit combi increased laboratory germination by 2.4%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Helafit combie0
Outcome
germination ratee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment with Helafit combi was more effective, as the germination rate in this experimental variant increased by 2.4%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–840 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased germination was attributed to reduced Fusarium moniliforme seed infection.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Interactor
Fusarium moniliforme ScheldFusarium verticillioidese0pathogen
Outcome
laboratory germinatione0
Qualifier
decrease in the infection of seedse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium verticillioides
Fusarium verticillioides · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in laboratory germination was observed due to a decrease in the infection of seeds of the lines by Fusarium moniliforme Scheld.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–981 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The DK 281 parent line yielded a maximum 3.65 t/ha at 90 thousand plants/ha with Helafit combi.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
DK 281e0
Treatment
density of 90 thousand plants/ha and treatment with Helafit combie0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
3.65 t/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum seed yield in the early maturing line - the parent component of DK 281 was recorded at a density of 90 thousand plants/ha and treatment with Helafit combi - 3.65 t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1161 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The DK 247 parent line yielded a maximum 4.89 t/ha at 80 thousand plants/ha with Helafit combi.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
DK 247e0
Treatment
density of 80 thousand plants/ha and treatment with Helafit combie0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
4.89 t/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum yield in the line - the parent component of DK 247 was observed at a density of 80 thousand plants/ha and treatment with Helafit combi - 4.89 t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1321 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The DK 411 parent line yielded a maximum 4.65 t/ha at 70 thousand plants/ha with Helafit combi.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
DK 411e0
Treatment
density of 70 thousand plants/ha and treatment with Helafit combie0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4.65 t/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The medium-late line - the parent component DK 411 showed the highest yield at a density of 70 thousand plants/ha and treatment with Helafit combi - 4.65 t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1481 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑