Paper · 2025 · Journal of Advances in Biology & Biotechnology

Effect of New Molecules of Herbicide on Weed Infestation, Growth and Yield of Kharif Rice

Salma Sahani; V V S Jaya Krishna; Mahadev Pramanick; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The research was conducted to study the effect of different herbicides on weed infestation, growth and yield of kharif rice. Field trail was conducted during the kharif season of 2020 at the Instructional Farm, Jaguli, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, West Bengal, under a randomized block design with nine treatment combinations. The variety Satabdi (IET-4786) was selected for the experiment and transplanted with the spacing of 20 cm × 10 cm. Treatments included various doses of UPH-814, a combination of bensulfuron methyl and pretilachlor, pyrazosulfuron ethyle, pretilachlor and hand weeding. The predominant weed species included Cynodon dactylon, Echinochloa spp., Cyperus spp., and various broadleaved weeds. Results showed that hand weeding achieved the lower weed population at all growth stages, among herbicidal treatments, particularly the combination of bensulfuron methyl and pretilachlor (T6) which result highest weed control efficiency at 60 DAT (80.77%) and UPH-814 (T3), were highly effective in controlling weed flora.Among all the herbicidal treatments minimum weed population at 30 DAS, 45 DAS, 60 DAS obtained in T3, pre-emergence application of UPH 814 (S) @ 2500 g ha-1. These treatments also resulted in the highest dry matter accumulation (810.90 g/m-2) at the time of harvest, grain and straw yields, with T6, Bensulfuron methyl 0.6%+ Pretilachlor 6% GR @10000 g/ha achieving a grain yield of 3.67 t/ha and a straw yield of 4.31 t/ha. Thus, UPH-814 and the combination of bensulfuron methyl and pretilachlor are promising options for effective weed management in kharif rice.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding gave the lowest weed population at all growth stages.

Treatment
hand weedinge0
Outcome
weed populatione0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hand weeding achieved the lower weed population at all growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–812 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 85–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bensulfuron methyl plus pretilachlor T6 achieved 80.77% weed control efficiency at 60 DAT.

Treatment
combination of bensulfuron methyl and pretilachlore0
Outcome
weed control efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
80.77%e0
Qualifier
60 DATe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combination of bensulfuron methyl and pretilachlor (T6) which result highest weed control efficiency at 60 DAT (80.77%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 85–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UPH-814 T3 was highly effective in controlling weed flora.

Treatment
UPH-814 (T3)e0
Outcome
controlling weed florae0
Direction
highly effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UPH-814 (T3), were highly effective in controlling weed flora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1045 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 85–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-emergence UPH 814 at 2500 g ha-1 produced the minimum weed population at 30, 45 and 60 DAS among herbicides.

Treatment
pre-emergence application of UPH 814 (S) @ 2500 g ha-1e0
Outcome
weed populatione0
Direction
minimume0
Qualifier
30 DAS, 45 DAS, 60 DASe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“minimum weed population at 30 DAS, 45 DAS, 60 DAS obtained in T3, pre-emergence application of UPH 814 (S) @ 2500 g ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1202 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 85–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

These herbicide treatments produced highest dry matter accumulation of 810.90 g/m-2 at harvest.

Treatment
These treatmentse0
Outcome
dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
810.90 g/m-2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These treatments also resulted in the highest dry matter accumulation (810.90 g/m-2) at the time of harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1311 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 85–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 gave grain yield of 3.67 t/ha.

Treatment
Bensulfuron methyl 0.6%+ Pretilachlor 6% GR @10000 g/hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Value
3.67 t/hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T6, Bensulfuron methyl 0.6%+ Pretilachlor 6% GR @10000 g/ha achieving a grain yield of 3.67 t/ha and a straw yield of 4.31 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1469 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 85–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 gave straw yield of 4.31 t/ha.

Treatment
Bensulfuron methyl 0.6%+ Pretilachlor 6% GR @10000 g/hae0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Value
4.31 t/hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T6, Bensulfuron methyl 0.6%+ Pretilachlor 6% GR @10000 g/ha achieving a grain yield of 3.67 t/ha and a straw yield of 4.31 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1469 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 85–89 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

UPH-814 and bensulfuron methyl plus pretilachlor are promising for kharif rice weed management.

Outcome
effective weed management in kharif ricee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UPH-814 and the combination of bensulfuron methyl and pretilachlor are promising options for effective weed management in kharif rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1477–1610 · show in text ↑

Pretilachlor · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

141 papers: 133 positive, 8 negative or no effect

132 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

137 papers more in this group

See all 141 papers →

Pretilachlor · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

150 papers: 147 positive, 3 negative or no effect

146 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

146 papers more in this group

See all 150 papers →

bensulfuron-methyl · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

45 papers: 39 positive, 6 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

bensulfuron-methyl · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 46 positive, 1 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

herbicide · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

603 papers: 579 positive, 24 negative or no effect

578 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

599 papers more in this group

See all 603 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.