Paper · 2025 · Agriculture

Evaluation of Honey as a Rooting Adjuvant for Cutting Propagation of Three Common Nursery Crops

Anthony T. Bowden; Patricia R. Knight; Jenny B. Ryals; et al.

9
claims
9
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Plant propagation is a labor-intensive process in the nursery and greenhouse industry, with labor accounting for 41.4% of expenditures in 2019—$4.8 billion of the $11.6 billion total. Labor availability remains a critical issue, and current methods of applying root-promoting compounds to cuttings often yield inconsistent rooting responses. This research investigated honey as a rooting adjuvant and its effects on rooting in Red Cascade™ miniature rose (Rosa ‘MOORcap’), common camellia (Camellia japonica), and southern magnolia (Magnolia grandiflora ‘Little Gem’). For Red Cascade™ rose, adding honey to water-soluble indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) solutions did not improve root counts compared to IBA alone. However, 1000 µL∙L⁻1 IBA produced more roots than 250 µL∙L⁻1 IBA. Camellia and magnolia cuttings were treated with multiflora, Manuka, or commercial honey, alongside IBA rates of 0 to 4500 µL∙L⁻1. In camellia, honey type or auxin rate did not significantly affect rooting, but local and multiflora honey combined with higher IBA rates increased root counts. For magnolia, multiflora honey improved both root number and quality, outperforming other treatments. While honey showed limited benefits for camellia and rose, multiflora honey demonstrated potential economic advantages for magnolia propagation, enhancing root quality and quantity for producers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding honey to IBA did not improve root counts of Red Cascade rose over IBA alone.

Taxon
rosee0
Material
Red Cascade™e0
Treatment
adding honey to water-soluble indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) solutionse0
Outcome
root countse0
Direction
did not improvee0
Comparator
IBA alonee0

Verbatim

e0

“For Red Cascade™ rose, adding honey to water-soluble indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) solutions did not improve root counts compared to IBA alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–709 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 1000 µL∙L⁻1 IBA rate produced more rose roots than 250 µL∙L⁻1.

Taxon
rosee0
Treatment
1000 µL∙L⁻1 IBAe0
Outcome
rootse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
250 µL∙L⁻1 IBAe0

Verbatim

e0

“For Red Cascade™ rose, adding honey to water-soluble indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) solutions did not improve root counts compared to IBA alone. However, 1000 µL∙L⁻1 IBA produced more roots than 250 µL∙L⁻1 IBA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–775 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Honey type did not significantly affect camellia rooting.

Taxon
camelliaCamelliae0
Treatment
honey typee0
Outcome
rootinge0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia
Camellia · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)junichiro aoyama from Kyoto, Japan · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In camellia, honey type or auxin rate did not significantly affect rooting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–982 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Auxin rate did not significantly affect camellia rooting.

Taxon
camelliaCamelliae0
Treatment
auxin ratee0
Outcome
rootinge0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia
Camellia · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)junichiro aoyama from Kyoto, Japan · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In camellia, honey type or auxin rate did not significantly affect rooting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–982 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Local honey combined with higher IBA rates increased camellia root counts.

Taxon
camelliaCamelliae0
Treatment
locale0
Outcome
root countse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
higher IBA ratese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia
Camellia · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)junichiro aoyama from Kyoto, Japan · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In camellia, honey type or auxin rate did not significantly affect rooting, but local and multiflora honey combined with higher IBA rates increased root counts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1067 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Multiflora honey combined with higher IBA rates increased camellia root counts.

Taxon
camelliaCamelliae0
Treatment
multiflora honey combined with higher IBA ratese0
Outcome
root countse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia
Camellia · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)junichiro aoyama from Kyoto, Japan · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In camellia, honey type or auxin rate did not significantly affect rooting, but local and multiflora honey combined with higher IBA rates increased root counts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1067 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Multiflora honey improved magnolia root number.

Taxon
magnoliaMagnoliae0
Treatment
multiflora honeye0
Outcome
root numbere0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Magnolia
Magnolia · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Magnolia_Watsoni.JPG : WibblyWibby derivative work: Wikiklaas ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For magnolia, multiflora honey improved both root number and quality, outperforming other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1169 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Multiflora honey improved magnolia root quality.

Taxon
magnoliaMagnoliae0
Treatment
multiflora honeye0
Outcome
qualitye0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Magnolia
Magnolia · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Magnolia_Watsoni.JPG : WibblyWibby derivative work: Wikiklaas ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For magnolia, multiflora honey improved both root number and quality, outperforming other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1169 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest multiflora honey may have economic advantages for magnolia propagation.

Taxon
magnoliaMagnoliae0
Outcome
potential economic advantages for magnolia propagatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Magnolia
Magnolia · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Magnolia_Watsoni.JPG : WibblyWibby derivative work: Wikiklaas ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“multiflora honey demonstrated potential economic advantages for magnolia propagation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1314 · show in text ↑

indole-3-butyric acid · growth · RosaPositive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

class · growth · CamelliaPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.