Paper · 2024 · Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical

Silicon as a salt stress mitigator in yellow passion fruit seedlings

Cristóvão Jacques de Sousa Almeida; Jussara Silva Dantas; Evandro Franklin de Mesquita; et al.

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT In the Brazilian semi-arid region, the production of passion fruit seedlings often faces challenges such as irrigation with saline water. However, silicate fertilization stands out as an effective solution for mitigating the salinity effects. This study aimed to evaluate the use of silicon as a salt stress mitigator in yellow passion fruit seedlings, under greenhouse conditions. The experimental design was completely randomized, with six replications, in a 5 × 2 factorial scheme, referring to five silicon doses (0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75 and 1.0 g plant-1) and two electrical conductivity levels of the irrigation water (1.2 and 3.5 dS m-1). Variables related to plant growth, biomass and physiology were analyzed. Silicon doses between 0.50 and 0.60 g plant-1 provided the best results for the passion fruit seedlings’ growth, water status and physiology, both under lower (1.2 dS m-1) and higher (3.5 dS m-1) salinity conditions. The silicon strengthened the plants and improved water absorption, mitigating the negative effects of salinity on the yellow passion fruit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon at 0.50–0.60 g per plant gave the best growth under both salinity levels.

Taxon
yellow passion fruitt0
Treatment
Silicon doses between 0.50 and 0.60 g plant-1e0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
best resultse0
Comparator
lower (1.2 dS m-1) and higher (3.5 dS m-1) salinity conditionse0

Not reportedSetting

Verbatim

e0

“Silicon doses between 0.50 and 0.60 g plant-1 provided the best results for the passion fruit seedlings’ growth, water status and physiology, both under lower (1.2 dS m-1) and higher (3.5 dS m-1) salinity conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–939 · show in text ↑
t0

“yellow passion fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon at 0.50–0.60 g per plant gave the best water status under both salinity levels.

Taxon
yellow passion fruitt0
Treatment
Silicon doses between 0.50 and 0.60 g plant-1e0
Outcome
water statuse0
Direction
best resultse0
Comparator
lower (1.2 dS m-1) and higher (3.5 dS m-1) salinity conditionse0

Not reportedSetting

Verbatim

e0

“Silicon doses between 0.50 and 0.60 g plant-1 provided the best results for the passion fruit seedlings’ growth, water status and physiology, both under lower (1.2 dS m-1) and higher (3.5 dS m-1) salinity conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–939 · show in text ↑
t0

“yellow passion fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon at 0.50–0.60 g per plant gave the best physiology under both salinity levels.

Taxon
yellow passion fruitt0
Treatment
Silicon doses between 0.50 and 0.60 g plant-1e0
Outcome
physiologye0
Direction
best resultse0
Comparator
lower (1.2 dS m-1) and higher (3.5 dS m-1) salinity conditionse0

Not reportedSetting

Verbatim

e0

“Silicon doses between 0.50 and 0.60 g plant-1 provided the best results for the passion fruit seedlings’ growth, water status and physiology, both under lower (1.2 dS m-1) and higher (3.5 dS m-1) salinity conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–939 · show in text ↑
t0

“yellow passion fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon improved plant water absorption under salinity.

Taxon
yellow passion fruite0
Treatment
silicone0
Outcome
water absorptione0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The silicon strengthened the plants and improved water absorption, mitigating the negative effects of salinity on the yellow passion fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1079 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon mitigated negative salinity effects on yellow passion fruit.

Taxon
yellow passion fruite0
Treatment
silicone0
Outcome
negative effects of salinitye0
Direction
mitigatinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The silicon strengthened the plants and improved water absorption, mitigating the negative effects of salinity on the yellow passion fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1079 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · growth · Passiflora edulis (passion fruit)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

silicon atom · nutrient: content · Passiflora edulis (passion fruit)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

silicon atom · physiology: water · Passiflora edulis (passion fruit)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.