Paper · 2025 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Unleashing the Potential of Blackgram: Exploring the Impact of Diverse Nutrient Prescription Techniques on Alfisols

C. Krithika; R. Santhi; S. Maragatham; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A study was conducted in Thondamuthur block, Coimbatore, during 2022–2023 and 2023–2024 to evaluate the impact of combining chemical fertilizers with farmyard manure (FYM) and biocompost on soil properties and blackgram yield. Three field experiments were carried out under varying soil organic carbon levels, with soil samples collected after 45 days and analyzed for biological properties. The combined application significantly enhanced soil health, improving bacterial, fungal, and actinomycetes populations, soil respiration, microbial quotient, microbial biomass carbon, and enzymatic activities, including urease, alkaline phosphatase, beta-glucosidase, and dehydrogenase. The STCR-IPNS-1.4 t ha− 1 resulted in the highest blackgram grain yields, ranging from 1314 to 1384 kg ha− 1 in experiment I and 1342–1368 kg ha− 1 in experiment II. During the year 2022–2023, the mean percent increase in grain yield due to STCR-IPNS-1.4 t ha− 1 (with FYM) was 48.2, 38.7, and 58.2 over blanket, blanket + FYM, and farmer’s practice, respectively. Similarly, during the year 2023–2024, the mean percent increase in grain yield due to STCR-IPNS-1.4 t ha− 1 (with biocompost) was 51.3, 43.8, and 63.8 over blanket, blanket + biocompost, and farmer’s practice. These findings highlight the potential of integrating organic and inorganic fertilizers to improve soil health and enhance crop yields in water-scarce regions. By boosting microbial activity and soil fertility, this approach offers a sustainable and cost-effective solution for addressing the challenges of soil degradation, water scarcity, and climate change in arid and semi-arid areas. This method can be adapted to similar regions globally, contributing to long-term agricultural sustainability and resilience.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined fertiliser application significantly improved bacterial, fungal and actinomycete populations in the soil.

Taxon
BlackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
combined applicatione0
Outcome
bacterial, fungal, and actinomycetes populationse0
Direction
improvinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Blackgram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“The combined application significantly enhanced soil health, improving bacterial, fungal, and actinomycetes populations, soil respiration, microbial quotient, microbial biomass carbon, and enzymatic activities, including urease, alkaline phosphatase, beta-glucosidase, and dehydrogenase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–678 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined fertiliser application improved soil respiration, microbial quotient and microbial biomass carbon.

Taxon
BlackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
combined applicatione0
Outcome
soil respiration, microbial quotient, microbial biomass carbone0
Direction
improvinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Blackgram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“The combined application significantly enhanced soil health, improving bacterial, fungal, and actinomycetes populations, soil respiration, microbial quotient, microbial biomass carbon, and enzymatic activities, including urease, alkaline phosphatase, beta-glucosidase, and dehydrogenase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–678 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined fertiliser application improved soil enzymatic activities.

Taxon
BlackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
combined applicatione0
Outcome
enzymatic activitiese0
Direction
improvinge0
Qualifier
urease, alkaline phosphatase, beta-glucosidase, and dehydrogenasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Blackgram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“The combined application significantly enhanced soil health, improving bacterial, fungal, and actinomycetes populations, soil respiration, microbial quotient, microbial biomass carbon, and enzymatic activities, including urease, alkaline phosphatase, beta-glucosidase, and dehydrogenase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–678 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

STCR-IPNS-1.4 t ha-1 gave the highest blackgram grain yield in experiment I, 1314 to 1384 kg ha-1.

Taxon
BlackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
STCR-IPNS-1.4 t ha− 1e0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1314 to 1384 kg ha− 1e0
Setting
experiment Ie0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Blackgram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“The STCR-IPNS-1.4 t ha− 1 resulted in the highest blackgram grain yields, ranging from 1314 to 1384 kg ha− 1 in experiment I”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–804 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

STCR-IPNS-1.4 t ha-1 gave the highest blackgram grain yield in experiment II, 1342 to 1368 kg ha-1.

Taxon
BlackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
STCR-IPNS-1.4 t ha− 1e0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1342–1368 kg ha− 1e0
Setting
experiment IIe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Blackgram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“The STCR-IPNS-1.4 t ha− 1 resulted in the highest blackgram grain yields, ranging from 1314 to 1384 kg ha− 1 in experiment I and 1342–1368 kg ha− 1 in experiment II”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–844 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2022–2023, STCR-IPNS with FYM increased grain yield by 48.2% over blanket fertiliser.

Taxon
BlackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
STCR-IPNS-1.4 t ha− 1 (with FYM)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
48.2e0
Comparator
blankete0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Blackgram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“During the year 2022–2023, the mean percent increase in grain yield due to STCR-IPNS-1.4 t ha− 1 (with FYM) was 48.2, 38.7, and 58.2 over blanket, blanket + FYM, and farmer’s practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–1029 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2022–2023, STCR-IPNS with FYM increased grain yield by 38.7% over blanket plus FYM.

Taxon
BlackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
STCR-IPNS-1.4 t ha− 1 (with FYM)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
38.7e0
Comparator
blanket + FYMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Blackgram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“During the year 2022–2023, the mean percent increase in grain yield due to STCR-IPNS-1.4 t ha− 1 (with FYM) was 48.2, 38.7, and 58.2 over blanket, blanket + FYM, and farmer’s practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–1029 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2022–2023, STCR-IPNS with FYM increased grain yield by 58.2% over farmer’s practice.

Taxon
BlackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
STCR-IPNS-1.4 t ha− 1 (with FYM)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
58.2e0
Comparator
farmer’s practicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Blackgram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“During the year 2022–2023, the mean percent increase in grain yield due to STCR-IPNS-1.4 t ha− 1 (with FYM) was 48.2, 38.7, and 58.2 over blanket, blanket + FYM, and farmer’s practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–1029 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2023–2024, STCR-IPNS with biocompost increased grain yield by 51.3% over blanket.

Taxon
BlackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
STCR-IPNS-1.4 t ha− 1 (with biocompost)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
51.3e0
Comparator
blankete0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Blackgram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“during the year 2023–2024, the mean percent increase in grain yield due to STCR-IPNS-1.4 t ha− 1 (with biocompost) was 51.3, 43.8, and 63.8 over blanket, blanket + biocompost, and farmer’s practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1253 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2023–2024, STCR-IPNS with biocompost increased grain yield by 43.8% over blanket plus biocompost.

Taxon
BlackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
STCR-IPNS-1.4 t ha− 1 (with biocompost)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
43.8e0
Comparator
blanket + biocomposte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Blackgram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“during the year 2023–2024, the mean percent increase in grain yield due to STCR-IPNS-1.4 t ha− 1 (with biocompost) was 51.3, 43.8, and 63.8 over blanket, blanket + biocompost, and farmer’s practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1253 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2023–2024, STCR-IPNS with biocompost increased grain yield by 63.8% over farmer’s practice.

Taxon
BlackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
STCR-IPNS-1.4 t ha− 1 (with biocompost)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
63.8e0
Comparator
farmer’s practicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Blackgram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“during the year 2023–2024, the mean percent increase in grain yield due to STCR-IPNS-1.4 t ha− 1 (with biocompost) was 51.3, 43.8, and 63.8 over blanket, blanket + biocompost, and farmer’s practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1253 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

199 papers: 197 positive, 2 negative or no effect

196 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

195 papers more in this group

See all 199 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.