Paper · 2020 · International Research Journal of Pure and Applied Chemistry

Effect of Biochar, FYM and Nitrogen on Uptake of Nutrients, Quality and Yield of Blackgram

Y. D. Kadam; G. S. Laharia; A. B. Age; et al.

4
claims
6
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The present investigation was conducted during Kharif season (2018-19) to study the interactive effect of biochar, FYM and nitrogen on uptake of nutrients, quality and yield of Blackgram at Research Farm, Department of Agronomy, Dr. PDKV, Akola. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design with nine treatments and three replications by split plot design (RCBD). The highest yield and yield attributing characters of blackgram were observed with soil application of biochar @ 10 t ha-1 + FYM @ 10 t ha-1 and nitrogen @ 20 kg ha-1. Nutrient content and uptake by blackgram was significantly highest in treatment where soil application of biochar @ 10 t ha-1 + FYM @ 10 t ha-1 and nitrogen @ 20 kg ha-1 was applied and it was on par with Biochar 5 t ha-1 + FYM 5 t ha-1 + Nitrogen 20 kg ha-1 and FYM 10 t ha-1 + Nitrogen 20 kg ha-1. The test weight was significantly highest in treatment receiving soil application of biochar @ 10 t ha-1 + FYM @ 10 t ha-1 and nitrogen @ 20 kg ha-1 and it was found to be on par with all other treatments expect treatment of control. Protein content of blackgram was increased (p<0.05) with the application of biochar @ 10 t ha-1 + FYM @ 10 t ha-1 and nitrogen @ 20 kg ha-1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined high-rate treatment gave the highest yield and yield attributes.

Taxon
blackgramVigna mungoe0
Treatment
soil application of biochar @ 10 t ha-1 + FYM @ 10 t ha-1 and nitrogen @ 20 kg ha-1e0
Outcome
yield and yield attributing characterse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yield and yield attributing characters of blackgram were observed with soil application of biochar @ 10 t ha-1 + FYM @ 10 t ha-1 and nitrogen @ 20 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–540 · show in text ↑
t0

“Blackgram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined high-rate treatment gave the highest nutrient content and uptake, on par with two other treatments.

Taxon
blackgramVigna mungoe0
Treatment
soil application of biochar @ 10 t ha-1 + FYM @ 10 t ha-1 and nitrogen @ 20 kg ha-1e0
Outcome
Nutrient content and uptakee0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
Biochar 5 t ha-1 + FYM 5 t ha-1 + Nitrogen 20 kg ha-1 and FYM 10 t ha-1 + Nitrogen 20 kg ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nutrient content and uptake by blackgram was significantly highest in treatment where soil application of biochar @ 10 t ha-1 + FYM @ 10 t ha-1 and nitrogen @ 20 kg ha-1 was applied and it was on par with Biochar 5 t ha-1 + FYM 5 t ha-1 + Nitrogen 20 kg ha-1 and FYM 10 t ha-1 + Nitrogen 20 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–840 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The high-rate treatment gave the highest test weight, on par with all treatments except control.

Taxon
BlackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
soil application of biochar @ 10 t ha-1 + FYM @ 10 t ha-1 and nitrogen @ 20 kg ha-1e0
Outcome
test weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The test weight was significantly highest in treatment receiving soil application of biochar @ 10 t ha-1 + FYM @ 10 t ha-1 and nitrogen @ 20 kg ha-1 and it was found to be on par with all other treatments expect treatment of control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–1074 · show in text ↑
t0

“Blackgram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The high-rate treatment increased blackgram protein content.

Taxon
blackgramVigna mungoe0
Treatment
application of biochar @ 10 t ha-1 + FYM @ 10 t ha-1 and nitrogen @ 20 kg ha-1e0
Outcome
Protein contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Protein content of blackgram was increased (p<0.05) with the application of biochar @ 10 t ha-1 + FYM @ 10 t ha-1 and nitrogen @ 20 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1215 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 33 positive, 1 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 41 positive, 1 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

199 papers: 197 positive, 2 negative or no effect

196 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

195 papers more in this group

See all 199 papers →

biochar · quality: protein · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · quality: grain · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

biochar · nutrient: content · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

biochar · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

8 of 14 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.