Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Nitrogen and Sulphur on the Performance of Blackgram (Vigna mungo L.) under Custard Apple (Annona squamosa L.) based Agri-Horti System

Sheelendra Kumar; Makhan Singh Karada; Jiwan Paudel; et al.

17
claims
30
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out during Kharif season of 2018 to evaluate Effect of nitrogen and sulphur on the performance of blackgram under custard apple (Annona squamosa L.) based agri-horti system. The result indicated that Number of nodules plant-1 decreased drastically from 30 to 50 DAS of crop. The maximum root nodules plant-1 was found at highest nitrogen (40 kg N ha-1) and sulphur level (40 kg S ha-1) followed by, medium and over control at 30 and 50 DAS. The maximum dry matter accumulation plant-1 was observed at 40 kg N and 40 kg S ha-1 whereas; lowest dry matter accumulation was found under control. Increasing levels of N and S from control to 40 kg N ha-1 and 40 kg S ha-1 significantly increased the grain yield, stover yield, biological yield and harvest index of blackgram. The N and S contents in grain and stover of blackgram significantly improved due to 40 kg N ha-1 and 40 kg S ha-1 whereas, minimum was found under control (0 kg N and 0 kg S ha-1). The nutrient uptake in grain and stover of blackgram under custard apple based agri-horti system, increased markedly with increasing levels of nitrogen and sulphur and uptake highest with 40 kg N ha-1 and 40 kg S ha-1 and lowest uptake was found under control. Protein content and protein yield were found statistically superior with 40 kg N ha-1 and 40 kg S ha-1 while minimum was noted in control condition. The maximum gross returns (Rs 55,468 ha-1), net returns (Rs 26,472 ha-1) and benefit: cost ratio (1.94) were obtained with 40 kg N ha-1, although, maximum gross returns (Rs 54887 ha-1), net returns (Rs 24371 ha-1) and benefit: cost ratio (1.83) was maintained by 40 kg S ha-1 and minimum net returns (Rs 17719 ha-1) and benefit: cost ratio (1.38) in control condition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nodules per plant decreased from 30 to 50 DAS.

Taxon
blackgramVigna mungot0
Outcome
Number of nodules plant-1e0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
30 to 50 DASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Number of nodules plant-1 decreased drastically from 30 to 50 DAS of crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–305 · show in text ↑
t0

“Blackgram (Vigna mungo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root nodules per plant were highest at the highest nitrogen and sulphur levels.

Taxon
blackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
nitrogen (40 kg N ha-1) and sulphur level (40 kg S ha-1)e0
Outcome
root nodules plant-1e0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum root nodules plant-1 was found at highest nitrogen (40 kg N ha-1) and sulphur level (40 kg S ha-1) followed by, medium and over control at 30 and 50 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–471 · show in text ↑
t0

“Blackgram (Vigna mungo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter accumulation was highest with 40 kg N and 40 kg S ha-1 and lowest under control.

Taxon
blackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
40 kg N and 40 kg S ha-1e0
Outcome
dry matter accumulation plant-1e0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum dry matter accumulation plant-1 was observed at 40 kg N and 40 kg S ha-1 whereas; lowest dry matter accumulation was found under control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–621 · show in text ↑
t0

“Blackgram (Vigna mungo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N and S significantly increased grain yield, stover yield and biological yield.

Taxon
blackgramVigna mungoe0
Treatment
40 kg N ha-1 and 40 kg S ha-1e0
Outcome
grain yield, stover yield, biological yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing levels of N and S from control to 40 kg N ha-1 and 40 kg S ha-1 significantly increased the grain yield, stover yield, biological yield and harvest index of blackgram.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–800 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N and S significantly increased blackgram harvest index.

Taxon
blackgramVigna mungoe0
Treatment
40 kg N ha-1 and 40 kg S ha-1e0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing levels of N and S from control to 40 kg N ha-1 and 40 kg S ha-1 significantly increased the grain yield, stover yield, biological yield and harvest index of blackgram.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–800 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N and S contents in blackgram grain and stover improved significantly at the highest N and S rates.

Taxon
blackgramVigna mungoe0
Treatment
40 kg N ha-1 and 40 kg S ha-1e0
Outcome
N and S contents in grain and stovere0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The N and S contents in grain and stover of blackgram significantly improved due to 40 kg N ha-1 and 40 kg S ha-1 whereas, minimum was found under control (0 kg N and 0 kg S ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–981 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient uptake in grain and stover increased with nitrogen and sulphur level.

Taxon
blackgramVigna mungoe0
Treatment
40 kg N ha-1 and 40 kg S ha-1e0
Outcome
nutrient uptake in grain and stovere0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nutrient uptake in grain and stover of blackgram under custard apple based agri-horti system, increased markedly with increasing levels of nitrogen and sulphur and uptake highest with 40 kg N ha-1 and 40 kg S ha-1 and lowest uptake was found under control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1242 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein content was statistically superior at 40 kg N and 40 kg S ha-1.

Taxon
blackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
40 kg N ha-1 and 40 kg S ha-1e0
Outcome
Protein contente0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
control conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Protein content and protein yield were found statistically superior with 40 kg N ha-1 and 40 kg S ha-1 while minimum was noted in control condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1391 · show in text ↑
t0

“Blackgram (Vigna mungo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein yield was statistically superior at 40 kg N and 40 kg S ha-1.

Taxon
blackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
40 kg N ha-1 and 40 kg S ha-1e0
Outcome
protein yielde0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
control conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Protein content and protein yield were found statistically superior with 40 kg N ha-1 and 40 kg S ha-1 while minimum was noted in control condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1391 · show in text ↑
t0

“Blackgram (Vigna mungo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gross returns with 40 kg N ha-1 were Rs 55,468 ha-1, the maximum.

Taxon
BlackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
40 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
gross returnse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
Rs 55,468 ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum gross returns (Rs 55,468 ha-1), net returns (Rs 26,472 ha-1) and benefit: cost ratio (1.94) were obtained with 40 kg N ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1527 · show in text ↑
t0

“Blackgram (Vigna mungo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net returns with 40 kg N ha-1 were Rs 26,472 ha-1, the maximum.

Taxon
BlackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
40 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
Rs 26,472 ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum gross returns (Rs 55,468 ha-1), net returns (Rs 26,472 ha-1) and benefit: cost ratio (1.94) were obtained with 40 kg N ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1527 · show in text ↑
t0

“Blackgram (Vigna mungo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The benefit: cost ratio with 40 kg N ha-1 was 1.94, the maximum.

Taxon
BlackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
40 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
benefit: cost ratioe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1.94e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum gross returns (Rs 55,468 ha-1), net returns (Rs 26,472 ha-1) and benefit: cost ratio (1.94) were obtained with 40 kg N ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1527 · show in text ↑
t0

“Blackgram (Vigna mungo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gross returns with 40 kg S ha-1 were Rs 54887 ha-1, the maximum for sulphur.

Taxon
BlackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
40 kg S ha-1e0
Outcome
gross returnse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
Rs 54887 ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum gross returns (Rs 54887 ha-1), net returns (Rs 24371 ha-1) and benefit: cost ratio (1.83) was maintained by 40 kg S ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1539–1667 · show in text ↑
t0

“Blackgram (Vigna mungo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net returns with 40 kg S ha-1 were Rs 24371 ha-1, the maximum for sulphur.

Taxon
BlackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
40 kg S ha-1e0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
Rs 24371 ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum gross returns (Rs 54887 ha-1), net returns (Rs 24371 ha-1) and benefit: cost ratio (1.83) was maintained by 40 kg S ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1539–1667 · show in text ↑
t0

“Blackgram (Vigna mungo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The benefit: cost ratio with 40 kg S ha-1 was 1.83, the maximum for sulphur.

Taxon
BlackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
40 kg S ha-1e0
Outcome
benefit: cost ratioe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1.83e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum gross returns (Rs 54887 ha-1), net returns (Rs 24371 ha-1) and benefit: cost ratio (1.83) was maintained by 40 kg S ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1539–1667 · show in text ↑
t0

“Blackgram (Vigna mungo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control net returns were the minimum at Rs 17719 ha-1.

Taxon
BlackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
control conditione0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
minimume0
Value
Rs 17719 ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“minimum net returns (Rs 17719 ha-1) and benefit: cost ratio (1.38) in control condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1760 · show in text ↑
t0

“Blackgram (Vigna mungo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control benefit: cost ratio was the minimum at 1.38.

Taxon
BlackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
control conditione0
Outcome
benefit: cost ratioe0
Direction
minimume0
Value
1.38e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“minimum net returns (Rs 17719 ha-1) and benefit: cost ratio (1.38) in control condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1760 · show in text ↑
t0

“Blackgram (Vigna mungo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–79 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · symbiosis · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 33 positive, 1 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

nitrogen · symbiosis · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.