Paper · 2017 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Comparative Profitability of Managing Meloidogyne incognita on Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) Using Carbofuran and Pulverized Aloe keayi Leaves

A. Tanimola, A.; Fawole, B.; O. Claudius-Cole, A.

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The cost-benefit of managing Meloidogyne incognita on cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) using leaves of Aloe keayi and carbofuran was evaluated in two field experiments at the University of Ibadan in Southwest Nigeria with the aim of selecting the more profitable management option. The experiments were laid out in a randomized complete block design and the treatments were: A. keayi at 80 kg/ha, carbofuran at 2 kg a.i./ha, untreated-infected control and uninfected control. Two-week old Ife Brown cowpea seedlings were inoculated with 10,000 eggs of M. incognita (except uninfected control). Air-dried milled leaves of A. keayi and carbofuran were applied one week after inoculation (WAI). Data collected at 10 WAI were: growth, yield, gall index (root damage), and Meloidogyne numbers. The costs and benefits of treatments were calculated. Treatment of M. incognita-infected cowpea with A. keayi and carbofuran improved vegetative growth by 201.6 % and 183.5%, respectively compared to untreated-infected cowpea. Root damage was reduced by 62.5% and 68.8% by A. keayi and carbofuran, respectively. A. keayi compared effectively with carbofuran in reduction of nematode population. Treated cowpea with A. keayi improved grain yield by 219.9% that translated to a gross margin (GM) of US$ 798.1 per hectare; whereas carbofuran gave a yield increase of 200.5% that translated into a GM of US$ 692.3 per hectare. Cost:benefit (CB) analysis showed positive return per hectare when cowpea was treated with A. keayi and carbofuran. Management of M. incognita on cowpea with A. keayi (CB=0.61) is more profitable than carbofuran (CB=0.74).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aloe treatment improved vegetative growth by 201.6%.

Treatment
A. keayie0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
vegetative growthe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
201.6 %e0
Comparator
untreated-infected cowpeae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of M. incognita-infected cowpea with A. keayi and carbofuran improved vegetative growth by 201.6 % and 183.5%, respectively compared to untreated-infected cowpea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–1009 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita on Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbofuran improved vegetative growth by 183.5%.

Treatment
carbofurane0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
vegetative growthe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
183.5%e0
Comparator
untreated-infected cowpeae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of M. incognita-infected cowpea with A. keayi and carbofuran improved vegetative growth by 201.6 % and 183.5%, respectively compared to untreated-infected cowpea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–1009 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita on Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aloe reduced root damage by 62.5%.

Treatment
A. keayie0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
Root damagee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
62.5%e0
Comparator
untreated-infected cowpeae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root damage was reduced by 62.5% and 68.8% by A. keayi and carbofuran, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1094 · show in text ↑
e1

“untreated-infected cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1008 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita on Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbofuran reduced root damage by 68.8%.

Treatment
carbofurane0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
Root damagee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
68.8%e0
Comparator
untreated-infected cowpeae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root damage was reduced by 62.5% and 68.8% by A. keayi and carbofuran, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1094 · show in text ↑
e1

“untreated-infected cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1008 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita on Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aloe and carbofuran had comparable nematode population reduction.

Treatment
A. keayie0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
nematode populatione0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
carbofurane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A. keayi compared effectively with carbofuran in reduction of nematode population.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1177 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita on Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aloe increased cowpea grain yield by 219.9%.

Treatment
A. keayie0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Value
219.9%e0
Comparator
untreated-infected cowpeae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treated cowpea with A. keayi improved grain yield by 219.9% that translated to a gross margin (GM) of US$ 798.1 per hectare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1301 · show in text ↑
e1

“untreated-infected cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1008 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita on Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–89 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aloe treatment yielded gross margin US$ 798.1 per hectare.

Treatment
A. keayie0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
gross margin (GM)e0
Value
US$ 798.1 per hectaree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treated cowpea with A. keayi improved grain yield by 219.9% that translated to a gross margin (GM) of US$ 798.1 per hectare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1301 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita on Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbofuran increased yield by 200.5%.

Treatment
carbofurane0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
200.5%e0
Comparator
untreated-infected cowpeae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“carbofuran gave a yield increase of 200.5% that translated into a GM of US$ 692.3 per hectare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1404 · show in text ↑
e1

“untreated-infected cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1008 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita on Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–89 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbofuran gave gross margin US$ 692.3 per hectare.

Treatment
carbofurane0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
GMe0
Value
US$ 692.3 per hectaree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“carbofuran gave a yield increase of 200.5% that translated into a GM of US$ 692.3 per hectare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1404 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita on Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–89 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both treatments had positive return per hectare.

Treatment
A. keayi and carbofurane0
Outcome
return per hectaree0
Direction
positivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cost:benefit (CB) analysis showed positive return per hectare when cowpea was treated with A. keayi and carbofuran.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1406–1521 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aloe management was reported more profitable than carbofuran, with CB=0.61 versus CB=0.74.

Treatment
A. keayie0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
profitablee0
Direction
moree0
Value
CB=0.61e0
Qualifier
CB=0.74e0
Comparator
carbofurane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Management of M. incognita on cowpea with A. keayi (CB=0.61) is more profitable than carbofuran (CB=0.74).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1522–1628 · show in text ↑

carbofuran · Meloidogyne incognita · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.