Intervention effectmodel-written summary

carbofuran reduced nematode multiplication in cowpea

A claim from Studies on the management of disease-complex caused by root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita and wilt fungus, Fusarium oxysporum on cowpea by neem cake and carbofuran · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

carbofuran reduced nematode multiplication in cowpea

Material
Pusa Komal (PK)e1
Treatment
carbofurane0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
nematode multiplicatione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Meloidogyne incognita and wilt fungus, Fusarium oxysporum on cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–142
e1

“cowpea cv. Pusa Komal (PK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–188
e0

“applicaton of both neem cake and carbofuran, in general, significantly increased plant growth and reduced nematode multiplication”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–330

Title

Studies on the management of disease-complex caused by root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita and wilt fungus, Fusarium oxysporum on cowpea by neem cake and carbofuran

Satyendra Singh; B.K. Goswami Indian Journal Of Nematology 2001

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-4fc07ca4e7d472e5a8284619b1b59b34d2e92c9d4fc00867cd4a0a5b5cc538e6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

carbofuran · Meloidogyne incognita · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.