Effect of Foliar Application of Nano Urea and Nano DAP on Growth and Yield Parameters of Grapes (Vitis vinifera) Cv. Muscat Hamburg

Abstract

An experiment conducted to assess the effect of foliar application of Nano Urea and Nano DAP on growth and yield parameters of grapes variety Muscat Hamburg. This experiment was conducted in Randomized Block Design (RBD) with 16 treatments (T1 (0.2% Nano Urea), T2 (0.3% Nano Urea), T3 (0.4% Nano Urea), T4 (0.2% Nano DAP), T5 (0.3% Nano DAP), T6 (0.4% Nano DAP), T7 (0.2% Nano Urea + 0.2% Nano DAP), T8 (0.2% Nano Urea + 0.3% Nano DAP), T9 (0.2% Nano Urea + 0.4% Nano DAP), T10 (0.3% Nano Urea + 0.2% Nano DAP), T11 (0.3% Nano Urea + 0.3% Nano DAP), T12 (0.3% Nano Urea + 0.4% Nano DAP), T13 (0.4% Nano Urea + 0.2% Nano DAP), T14 (0.4% Nano Urea + 0.3% Nano DAP), T15 (0.4% Nano Urea + 0.4% Nano DAP) & T16 (Recommended dose of NP through soil application)) in two replications and sprayed at vegetative stage and berry development stage. The data revealed that T9 (0.2% Nano Urea + 0.4% Nano DAP) showed the highest values for Growth parameters like leaf length (cm), leaf width (cm), leaf area (cm2 ), shoot length (cm), petiole base girth (cm), cane girth (cm), specific leaf weight (mg/cm2 ) and yield parameters like bunch weight (g), number of rachis per bunch, number of berries per rachis, number of berries per bunch, number of bunches per vine and yield per vine (kg). In comparison, T16 (Recommended dose of NPK through soil application) showed the lowest growth and yield parameter values.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 (0.2% Nano Urea + 0.4% Nano DAP) gave the highest leaf length, leaf width and leaf area.

Taxon: Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Material: Muscat Hamburgt0
Treatment: T9 (0.2% Nano Urea + 0.4% Nano DAP)e1
Outcome: leaf length (cm), leaf width (cm), leaf area (cm2 )e1
Direction: higheste1
Comparator: Recommended dose of NPK through soil applicatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

*Vitis vinifera* · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0
“Grapes (Vitis vinifera) Cv. Muscat Hamburg”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–131 · show in text ↑

e1
“T9 (0.2% Nano Urea + 0.4% Nano DAP) showed the highest values for Growth parameters like leaf length (cm), leaf width (cm), leaf area (cm2 ), shoot length (cm), petiole base girth (cm), cane girth (cm), specific leaf weight (mg/cm2 ) and yield parameters like bunch weight (g), number of rachis per bunch, number of berries per rachis, number of berries per bunch, number of bunches per vine and yield per vine (kg)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–1278 · show in text ↑

e2
“T16 (Recommended dose of NPK through soil application) showed the lowest growth and yield parameter values”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1401 · show in text ↑

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 gave the highest shoot length, petiole base girth and cane girth.

Taxon: Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Material: Muscat Hamburgt0
Treatment: T9 (0.2% Nano Urea + 0.4% Nano DAP)e1
Outcome: shoot length (cm), petiole base girth (cm), cane girth (cm)e1
Direction: higheste1
Comparator: Recommended dose of NPK through soil applicatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim

t0
“Grapes (Vitis vinifera) Cv. Muscat Hamburg”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–131 · show in text ↑

e1
“T9 (0.2% Nano Urea + 0.4% Nano DAP) showed the highest values for Growth parameters like leaf length (cm), leaf width (cm), leaf area (cm2 ), shoot length (cm), petiole base girth (cm), cane girth (cm), specific leaf weight (mg/cm2 ) and yield parameters like bunch weight (g), number of rachis per bunch, number of berries per rachis, number of berries per bunch, number of bunches per vine and yield per vine (kg)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–1278 · show in text ↑

e2
“T16 (Recommended dose of NPK through soil application) showed the lowest growth and yield parameter values”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1401 · show in text ↑

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 gave the highest specific leaf weight.

Taxon: Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Material: Muscat Hamburgt0
Treatment: T9 (0.2% Nano Urea + 0.4% Nano DAP)e1
Outcome: specific leaf weight (mg/cm2 )e1
Direction: higheste1
Comparator: Recommended dose of NPK through soil applicatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim

t0
“Grapes (Vitis vinifera) Cv. Muscat Hamburg”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–131 · show in text ↑

e1
“T9 (0.2% Nano Urea + 0.4% Nano DAP) showed the highest values for Growth parameters like leaf length (cm), leaf width (cm), leaf area (cm2 ), shoot length (cm), petiole base girth (cm), cane girth (cm), specific leaf weight (mg/cm2 ) and yield parameters like bunch weight (g), number of rachis per bunch, number of berries per rachis, number of berries per bunch, number of bunches per vine and yield per vine (kg)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–1278 · show in text ↑

e2
“T16 (Recommended dose of NPK through soil application) showed the lowest growth and yield parameter values”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1401 · show in text ↑

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 gave the highest bunch weight, rachis number per bunch and berry number per rachis.

Taxon: Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Material: Muscat Hamburgt0
Treatment: T9 (0.2% Nano Urea + 0.4% Nano DAP)e1
Outcome: bunch weight (g), number of rachis per bunch, number of berries per rachise1
Direction: higheste1
Comparator: Recommended dose of NPK through soil applicatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim

t0
“Grapes (Vitis vinifera) Cv. Muscat Hamburg”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–131 · show in text ↑

e1
“T9 (0.2% Nano Urea + 0.4% Nano DAP) showed the highest values for Growth parameters like leaf length (cm), leaf width (cm), leaf area (cm2 ), shoot length (cm), petiole base girth (cm), cane girth (cm), specific leaf weight (mg/cm2 ) and yield parameters like bunch weight (g), number of rachis per bunch, number of berries per rachis, number of berries per bunch, number of bunches per vine and yield per vine (kg)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–1278 · show in text ↑

e2
“T16 (Recommended dose of NPK through soil application) showed the lowest growth and yield parameter values”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1401 · show in text ↑

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 gave the highest berry number per bunch, bunch number per vine and yield per vine.

Taxon: Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Material: Muscat Hamburgt0
Treatment: T9 (0.2% Nano Urea + 0.4% Nano DAP)e1
Outcome: number of berries per bunch, number of bunches per vine and yield per vine (kg)e1
Direction: higheste1
Comparator: Recommended dose of NPK through soil applicatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim

t0
“Grapes (Vitis vinifera) Cv. Muscat Hamburg”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–131 · show in text ↑

e1
“T9 (0.2% Nano Urea + 0.4% Nano DAP) showed the highest values for Growth parameters like leaf length (cm), leaf width (cm), leaf area (cm2 ), shoot length (cm), petiole base girth (cm), cane girth (cm), specific leaf weight (mg/cm2 ) and yield parameters like bunch weight (g), number of rachis per bunch, number of berries per rachis, number of berries per bunch, number of bunches per vine and yield per vine (kg)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–1278 · show in text ↑

e2
“T16 (Recommended dose of NPK through soil application) showed the lowest growth and yield parameter values”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1401 · show in text ↑

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The recommended NPK soil application gave the lowest growth and yield parameter values.

Taxon: Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Material: Muscat Hamburgt0
Treatment: Recommended dose of NPK through soil applicatione2
Outcome: growth and yield parameter valuese2
Direction: loweste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim

t0
“Grapes (Vitis vinifera) Cv. Muscat Hamburg”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–131 · show in text ↑

e2
“T16 (Recommended dose of NPK through soil application) showed the lowest growth and yield parameter values”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1401 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

no effect
Nitrogen did not affect total vine yield in the first and last seasons.
Effect of nitrogen fertilization on growth, canopy density, and yield of "Vitis vinifera" L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon · 1999
Opposite direction
no effect
Nitrogen supply did not affect Glera fruit yield or plant vigor.
Improving the Oenological Potential of Grapes for Prosecco PDO Sparkling Wine Thanks to Nitrogen Fertigation · 2023
Opposite direction
positive
Nitrogen limitation curtailed yields.
Gas exchange, vine performance and modulation of secondary metabolism in Vitis vinifera L. cv Barbera following long-term nitrogen deficit · 2021 · compared with non-limiting nitrogen availability
Same directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

See all 4 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

no effect
Foliar N+S fertilization did not modify vine vigour or maturity level of grapes compared with the control.
Effect of foliar nitrogen and sulphur application on aromatic expression of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Sauvignon blanc · 2008 · compared with the control
Opposite direction
no effect
Neither rootstock nor applied nitrogen affected the duration of vegetative growth.
Effects of Rootstock and Nitrogen Fertilization on the Growth and Yield of Chardonnay Grapevines in New York · 1988
Opposite direction
no effect
At 200 to 400 g N/vine, petiole nitrate, leaf area, and canopy density did not differ from 100 g N/vine.
Effect of nitrogen fertilization on growth, canopy density, and yield of "Vitis vinifera" L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon · 1999 · compared with 100 g N/vine
No difference from an alternative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 17 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

positive
N fertilization slightly increased vine yield and shoot growth.
Effects of Long-Term Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Potassium Fertilization on Chenin blanc Vines. I. Nutrient Demand and Vine Performance · 1989
Opposite direction
positive
Compost, particularly mulching, increased yield and specific berry weight.
Effect of incorporated or mulched compost on leaf nutrient concentrations and performance of Vitis vinifera cv. Merlot · 2013
Opposite direction
positive
Compost treatments significantly increased grape yield relative to the unamended control.
Recycling of Agro-food Wastes into Vineyards by Composting: Agronomic Validation in Field Conditions · 2012 · compared with control treatment (B)
Opposite direction

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

application · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 26 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

positive
Spray treatments with the same compounds induced abscission on Muscat of Alexandria at appropriate concentrations.
Effect of Ethrel, Abscisic Acid, and a Morphactin on Flower and Berry Abscission and Shoot Growth in Vitis vinifera1 · 1969
Opposite direction
positive
Fruit yield of injection-fertilized grapevine cultivars was 32-49% higher than with soil fertilization.
Injection Fertilization: A Full Nutritional Technique for Fruit Trees Saves 90-95% of Fertilizers and Maintains a Clean Environment · 2009 · compared with soil fertilization
Opposite direction
positive
Later GA sprays increased cluster weight in Bhokri.
Response of Certain SeededVitis ViniferaVarieties to Gibberellin Application at Postbloom Stage · 1968
Opposite direction

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

positive
Foliar Mg-NPs were more effective than the other magnesium forms at improving berry development
A Comparison of the Effects of Several Foliar Forms of Magnesium Fertilization on ‘Superior Seedless’ (Vitis vinifera L.) in Saline Soils · 2022 · compared with other magnesium forms
Same direction

See all 2 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

positive
Vines given nano Zn chelate at 500 mg kg−1 had the highest yield.
Effect of nano zinc oxide, nano zinc chelate and zinc sulfate on vineyard soil Zn- availability and grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.) yield and quality · 2022
Same direction
positive
NanoKremny had a positive effect on vegetative development, water balance and productivity of grape plants.
NanoKremny effect on the quality of grapes and wines · 2021
Same direction
positive
Total yield increased by about 8.9–11.4%.
Enhancing the yield and berry color of crimson seedless table grape variety (Vitis vinifera L.) via zinc oxide nanoparticles integrated with molasses · 2026 · compared with control treatment
Same direction

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.

Abstract

Claims 6

The same questions in other papers

nitrogen · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

nitrogen · growth · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

fertilization · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

application · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

nanoparticle · growth · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

nanoparticle · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree