Paper · 2022 · Coatings

A Comparison of the Effects of Several Foliar Forms of Magnesium Fertilization on ‘Superior Seedless’ (Vitis vinifera L.) in Saline Soils

Sally F. Abo El-Ezz; Lo’ay A. A.; Nadi Awad Al-Harbi; et al.

7
claims
17
verbatim quotes
22
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Magnesium (Mg) is the most essential element constituent in chlorophyll molecules that regulates photosynthesis processes. The physiological response of ‘Superior Seedless’ grapes was evaluated under different foliar magnesium fertilization such as sulfate magnesium (MgSO4·7 H2O), magnesium disodium EDTA (Mg-EDTA), and magnesium nanoparticles (Mg-NPs) during the berry development stages (flowering, fruit set, veraison, and harvest). In general, the ‘Superior Seedless’ vine had a higher performance in photosynthesis with Mg-NPs application than other forms. The Fy/Fm ratio declined rapidly after the fruit set stage; then, it decreased gradually up until the harvesting stage. However, both MgSO4 and Mg-EDTA forms showed slight differences in Fv/Fm ratio during the berry development stages. The outcomes of this research suggest that the Fv/Fm ratio during the growth season of the ‘Superior Seedless’ vine may be a good tool to assess magnesium fertilization effects before visible deficiency symptoms appear. Mg-NPs are more effective at improving ‘Superior Seedless’ berry development than the other magnesium forms. These findings suggest that applying foliar Mg-NPs to vines grown on salinity-sandy soil alleviates the potential Mg deficiency in ‘Superior Seedless’ vines and improves bunches quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Mg-NPs gave the vines higher photosynthesis performance than the other magnesium forms

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Treatment
Mg-NPs applicatione1
Outcome
performance in photosynthesise1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
other formse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vitis vinifera L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“had a higher performance in photosynthesis with Mg-NPs application than other forms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–561 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Fy/Fm ratio declined after the fruit set stage

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Organ / stage
fruit set stagee2
Outcome
Fy/Fm ratioe2
Direction
declinede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vitis vinifera L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–120 · show in text ↑
e2

“The Fy/Fm ratio declined rapidly after the fruit set stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–621 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MgSO4 and Mg-EDTA showed slight differences in Fv/Fm ratio during berry development

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Organ / stage
berry development stagese3
Treatment
MgSO4 and Mg-EDTA formse3
Outcome
Fv/Fm ratioe3
Qualifier
slight differencese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vitis vinifera L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–120 · show in text ↑
e3

“both MgSO4 and Mg-EDTA forms showed slight differences in Fv/Fm ratio during the berry development stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–797 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Mg-NPs were more effective than the other magnesium forms at improving berry development

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Treatment
Mg-NPse4
Outcome
berry developmente5
Direction
more effectivee4
Comparator
other magnesium formse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vitis vinifera L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–120 · show in text ↑
e4

“Mg-NPs are more effective at improving”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1057 · show in text ↑
e5

“berry development than the other magnesium forms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Mg-NPs alleviated the potential Mg deficiency in vines grown on salinity-sandy soil

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Treatment
foliar Mg-NPse6
Outcome
potential Mg deficiencye6
Direction
alleviatese6
Setting
salinity-sandy soile6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vitis vinifera L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–120 · show in text ↑
e6

“applying foliar Mg-NPs to vines grown on salinity-sandy soil alleviates the potential Mg deficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1255 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Mg-NPs improved bunch quality

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Treatment
foliar Mg-NPse6
Outcome
bunches qualitye7
Direction
improvese7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vitis vinifera L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–120 · show in text ↑
e6

“applying foliar Mg-NPs to vines grown on salinity-sandy soil alleviates the potential Mg deficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1255 · show in text ↑
e7

“and improves bunches quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1313 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The Fv/Fm ratio during the growth season may be a good tool to assess magnesium fertilization effects before visible deficiency symptoms appear

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Outcome
assess magnesium fertilization effectse4
Qualifier
before visible deficiency symptoms appeare4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vitis vinifera L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–120 · show in text ↑
e4

“may be a good tool to assess magnesium fertilization effects before visible deficiency symptoms appear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1017 · show in text ↑
e5

“the Fv/Fm ratio during the growth season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–882 · show in text ↑

magnesium atom · growth · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

magnesium atom · nutrient: content · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

magnesium atom · physiology: photosynthesis · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · quality: general · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: photosynthesis · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: general · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.