Paper · 2015 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Effects of K-Mg ratio on growth and cation nutrition ofVitis viniferaL. cv. “Dattier de Beiruth” grafted on SO4 rootstock

Mohamed Toumi; Bouzid Nedjimi; Amor Halitim; et al.

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The area of planting of Vitis vinifera L. cv. "Dattier de Beiruth" (DB) grafted on the SO4 (Selection OPPENHEIM 4) rootstock is significant and constantly growing in Northern Algeria. A hydroponic culture was carried out with DB to investigate the effects of potassium-magnesium (K-Mg) ratio on plant growth and mineral nutrition. Four nutrient solutions were tested on which the K-Mg ratio is variable (nutritive solution (NS)1 = 0.3 K: 3.8 Mg, NS2 = 2.1 K: 2 Mg, NS3 = 2.6 K: 1.5 Mg and NS4 = 3.8 K: 0.3 Mg). The results showed that DB was characterized by a high capacity for K uptake. No significant differences among the treatments were detected in the leaf concentrations of calcium (Ca), however Mg uptake was inhibited by increase of K: Mg in the nutrient solution. Results showed that DB is sensitive to the variation of the cation composition in the nutrient solution. Antagonism between K-Mg was apparent.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dattier de Beiruth grapevine showed high potassium uptake capacity.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
Material
"Dattier de Beiruth"e1
Outcome
high capacity for K uptakee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that DB was characterized by a high capacity for K uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–588 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vitis vinifera L. cv. "Dattier de Beiruth" (DB) grafted on the SO4 (Selection OPPENHEIM 4) rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 24–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf calcium concentrations did not differ significantly among K-Mg treatments.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
Material
"Dattier de Beiruth"e1
Treatment
Four nutrient solutionse2
Outcome
leaf concentrations of calcium (Ca)e0
Direction
No significant differencese0
Comparator
among the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No significant differences among the treatments were detected in the leaf concentrations of calcium (Ca)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–693 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vitis vinifera L. cv. "Dattier de Beiruth" (DB) grafted on the SO4 (Selection OPPENHEIM 4) rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 24–124 · show in text ↑
e2

“Four nutrient solutions were tested on which the K-Mg ratio is variable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–402 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing the nutrient solution K-Mg ratio inhibited magnesium uptake.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
Treatment
increase of K: Mg in the nutrient solutione0
Outcome
Mg uptakee0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mg uptake was inhibited by increase of K: Mg in the nutrient solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–772 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vitis vinifera L. cv. "Dattier de Beiruth" (DB) grafted on the SO4 (Selection OPPENHEIM 4) rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 24–124 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dattier de Beiruth was sensitive to variation in nutrient solution cation composition.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
Outcome
sensitive to the variation of the cation compositione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that DB is sensitive to the variation of the cation composition in the nutrient solution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–878 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vitis vinifera L. cv. "Dattier de Beiruth" (DB) grafted on the SO4 (Selection OPPENHEIM 4) rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 24–124 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium and magnesium showed antagonism.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
Outcome
Antagonism between K-Mge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Antagonism between K-Mg was apparent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–916 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vitis vinifera L. cv. "Dattier de Beiruth" (DB) grafted on the SO4 (Selection OPPENHEIM 4) rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 24–124 · show in text ↑

magnesium atom · nutrient: content · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 11 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.