Paper · 2024 · Scientific Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Response Superior Grape Yield and Quality to Organic and Inorganic Fertilization

A.M.M. Wassel; Hassan E.A.; Soad E.A. Ahmed

12
claims
21
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The study was conducted across two consecutive growing seasons (2020/2021 and 2021/2022) on Superior seedless grapevines to assess the effects of organic, mineral, and biofertilization techniques on the yield, and quality of Superior grapevines, as well as specific chemical constituents. The impact of utilizing organic treatments on grape production was apparent as it led to an improvement in both quantity and quality. By incorporating compost along with compost tea treatment, the yield of superior seedless grapes was maximized, with notable enhancements in terms of cluster number per vine, cluster weight, yield per vine, and yield per fed. Additionally, this method contributed to enhanced berry quality, as indicated by increased TSS% and TSS/TA ratio, as well as reduced TA% and sugar%. Enhanced yield and quality of Superior seedless grapes were achieved through the application of mineral and/or biofertilization. The combination of Min-NK and bio-P resulted in the highest yield, including improvements in cluster number per vine, cluster weight, yield per vine, and yield per hectare over two growing seasons. Additionally, the treatment involving mineral potassium and biological nitrogen and phosphorus demonstrated supreme quality aspects compared to other treatments. The influence of combination between organic and mineral and/or bio fertilization was significant for all studied traits. The best yield and its components were achieved from vines fertilized by (compost + compost tea) and supplied by (Min-NK + bio-P), however, the highest quality was observed with vines treated with (compost + compost tea) and supplied with (Min-K + bio-NP).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost with compost tea maximized the yield of superior seedless grapes.

Taxon
superior seedless grapese1
Treatment
compost along with compost tea treatmente1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
maximizede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“By incorporating compost along with compost tea treatment, the yield of superior seedless grapes was maximized, with notable enhancements in terms of cluster number per vine, cluster weight, yield per vine, and yield per fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–647 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost with compost tea enhanced cluster number per vine, cluster weight and yield per vine of superior seedless grapes.

Taxon
superior seedless grapese1
Treatment
compost along with compost tea treatmente1
Outcome
cluster number per vine, cluster weight, yield per vinee1
Direction
enhancementse1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“By incorporating compost along with compost tea treatment, the yield of superior seedless grapes was maximized, with notable enhancements in terms of cluster number per vine, cluster weight, yield per vine, and yield per fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–647 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost with compost tea enhanced yield per fed of superior seedless grapes.

Taxon
superior seedless grapese1
Treatment
compost along with compost tea treatmente1
Outcome
yield per fede1
Direction
enhancementse1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“By incorporating compost along with compost tea treatment, the yield of superior seedless grapes was maximized, with notable enhancements in terms of cluster number per vine, cluster weight, yield per vine, and yield per fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–647 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost with compost tea increased TSS% and TSS/TA ratio of berries.

Taxon
superior seedless grapese1
Treatment
compost along with compost tea treatmente1
Outcome
TSS% and TSS/TA ratioe2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“By incorporating compost along with compost tea treatment, the yield of superior seedless grapes was maximized, with notable enhancements in terms of cluster number per vine, cluster weight, yield per vine, and yield per fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–647 · show in text ↑
e2

“Additionally, this method contributed to enhanced berry quality, as indicated by increased TSS% and TSS/TA ratio, as well as reduced TA% and sugar%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–796 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost with compost tea reduced TA% and sugar% of berries.

Taxon
superior seedless grapese1
Treatment
compost along with compost tea treatmente1
Outcome
TA% and sugar%e2
Direction
reducede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“By incorporating compost along with compost tea treatment, the yield of superior seedless grapes was maximized, with notable enhancements in terms of cluster number per vine, cluster weight, yield per vine, and yield per fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–647 · show in text ↑
e2

“Additionally, this method contributed to enhanced berry quality, as indicated by increased TSS% and TSS/TA ratio, as well as reduced TA% and sugar%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–796 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Min-NK and bio-P gave the highest seedless grape yield over two growing seasons.

Taxon
Superior seedless grapevinese0
Treatment
Min-NK and bio-Pe3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
higheste3
Qualifier
over two growing seasonse3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“on Superior seedless grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–120 · show in text ↑
e3

“The combination of Min-NK and bio-P resulted in the highest yield, including improvements in cluster number per vine, cluster weight, yield per vine, and yield per hectare over two growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Min-NK and bio-P improved cluster number per vine, cluster weight and yield per vine.

Taxon
Superior seedless grapevinese0
Treatment
Min-NK and bio-Pe3
Outcome
cluster number per vine, cluster weight, yield per vinee3
Direction
improvementse3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“on Superior seedless grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–120 · show in text ↑
e3

“The combination of Min-NK and bio-P resulted in the highest yield, including improvements in cluster number per vine, cluster weight, yield per vine, and yield per hectare over two growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Min-NK and bio-P improved yield per hectare.

Taxon
Superior seedless grapevinese0
Treatment
Min-NK and bio-Pe3
Outcome
yield per hectaree3
Direction
improvementse3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“on Superior seedless grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–120 · show in text ↑
e3

“The combination of Min-NK and bio-P resulted in the highest yield, including improvements in cluster number per vine, cluster weight, yield per vine, and yield per hectare over two growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral potassium with biological nitrogen and phosphorus gave supreme quality compared with other treatments.

Taxon
Superior seedless grapevinese0
Treatment
mineral potassium and biological nitrogen and phosphoruse4
Outcome
quality aspectse4
Direction
supremee4
Comparator
other treatmentse4

Verbatim

e0

“on Superior seedless grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–120 · show in text ↑
e4

“the treatment involving mineral potassium and biological nitrogen and phosphorus demonstrated supreme quality aspects compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1285 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of organic and mineral and/or bio fertilization significantly influenced all studied traits of Superior seedless grapevines.

Taxon
Superior seedless grapevinese0
Treatment
combination between organic and mineral and/or bio fertilizatione5
Outcome
all studied traitse5

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“on Superior seedless grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–120 · show in text ↑
e5

“The influence of combination between organic and mineral and/or bio fertilization was significant for all studied traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1407 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The best yield and its components came from vines fertilized with compost plus compost tea and supplied with Min-NK plus bio-P.

Taxon
Superior seedless grapevinese0
Treatment
Min-NK + bio-Pe6
Outcome
best yield and its componentse6
Direction
beste6
Qualifier
fertilized by (compost + compost tea)e6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“on Superior seedless grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–120 · show in text ↑
e6

“The best yield and its components were achieved from vines fertilized by (compost + compost tea) and supplied by (Min-NK + bio-P)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1409–1538 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vines treated with compost plus compost tea and supplied with Min-K plus bio-NP had the highest quality.

Taxon
Superior seedless grapevinese0
Treatment
Min-K + bio-NPe7
Outcome
qualitye7
Direction
higheste7
Qualifier
treated with (compost + compost tea)e7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“on Superior seedless grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–120 · show in text ↑
e7

“the highest quality was observed with vines treated with (compost + compost tea) and supplied with (Min-K + bio-NP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1549–1664 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: general · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

potassium · quality: general · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: general · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.