Abstract
Introduction. There is still an urgent need in viticulture for studying the effect of tank mixtures of pesticides and bioactive substances on Vitis vinifera and, therefore, the quality and composition of wine. We aimed to study the effect of NanoKremny (silicon fertilizer) treatment of the grapevine on the productivity and quality of grape harvest, as well as the quality of dry wines. Study objects and methods. Grape varieties from three vineyards in Crimea and the wines produced from them. We applied standard methods used in viticulture, plant protection, and oenological practice. Organic acids and volatile components in grapes and wines were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography and gas chromatography. Results and discussion. We found that the most effective use of NanoKremny was threefold at 0.15 L/ha during the periods of active growth and formation of vegetative and generative organs in grapevines. It had a positive effect on vegetative development, water balance, productivity of grape plants, as well as yield quality and quantity. Also, NanoKremny decreased the development of mildew and oidium diseases, preserved the content of titratable acids in grapes during their ripening, as well as accumulated phenolic compounds, tartaric and malic acids in grape berries. Conclusion. We found no negative effect of NanoKremny treatment of the grapevine on the physicochemical parameters and sensory characteristics of wines. Thus, this preparation can be used as a bioorganic additive in viticulture.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
NanoKremny had a positive effect on vegetative development, water balance and productivity of grape plants.
- Taxon
- Vitis vinifera
Vitis viniferae0 - Treatment
- NanoKremny (silicon fertilizer)e2
- Outcome
- vegetative development, water balance, productivity of grape plantse1
- Direction
- positive effecte1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“studying the effect of tank mixtures of pesticides and bioactive substances on Vitis vinifera”
e1“It had a positive effect on vegetative development, water balance, productivity of grape plants, as well as yield quality and quantity”
e2“the effect of NanoKremny (silicon fertilizer) treatment of the grapevine”
Claim · model-written summary
NanoKremny had a positive effect on yield quality and quantity of grapes.
- Taxon
- Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
- Treatment
- NanoKremny (silicon fertilizer)e2
- Outcome
- yield quality and quantitye1
- Direction
- positive effecte1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“studying the effect of tank mixtures of pesticides and bioactive substances on Vitis vinifera”
e1“It had a positive effect on vegetative development, water balance, productivity of grape plants, as well as yield quality and quantity”
e2“the effect of NanoKremny (silicon fertilizer) treatment of the grapevine”
Claim · model-written summary
NanoKremny decreased the development of mildew and oidium diseases in grapevine.
- Taxon
- Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
- Treatment
- NanoKremnye3
- Interactor
- mildewe3pathogen
- Outcome
- development of mildew and oidium diseasese3
- Direction
- decreasede3
OidiumNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“studying the effect of tank mixtures of pesticides and bioactive substances on Vitis vinifera”
e3“NanoKremny decreased the development of mildew and oidium diseases”
Claim · model-written summary
NanoKremny preserved the content of titratable acids in grapes during ripening.
- Taxon
- Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
- Organ / stage
- grapese4
- Treatment
- NanoKremnye3
- Outcome
- content of titratable acids in grapese4
- Direction
- preservede4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“studying the effect of tank mixtures of pesticides and bioactive substances on Vitis vinifera”
e3“NanoKremny decreased the development of mildew and oidium diseases”
e4“preserved the content of titratable acids in grapes during their ripening”
Claim · model-written summary
NanoKremny increased accumulation of phenolic compounds, tartaric and malic acids in grape berries.
- Taxon
- Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
- Organ / stage
- grape berriese5
- Treatment
- NanoKremnye3
- Outcome
- phenolic compounds, tartaric and malic acidse5
- Direction
- accumulatede5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“studying the effect of tank mixtures of pesticides and bioactive substances on Vitis vinifera”
e3“NanoKremny decreased the development of mildew and oidium diseases”
e5“accumulated phenolic compounds, tartaric and malic acids in grape berries”
Claim · model-written summary
NanoKremny treatment had no negative effect on the physicochemical and sensory characteristics of wines.
- Taxon
- Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
- Treatment
- NanoKremny treatment of the grapevinee6
- Outcome
- physicochemical parameters and sensory characteristics of winese6
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“studying the effect of tank mixtures of pesticides and bioactive substances on Vitis vinifera”
e6“We found no negative effect of NanoKremny treatment of the grapevine on the physicochemical parameters and sensory characteristics of wines”
Claim · model-written summary
The threefold application of NanoKremny at 0.15 L/ha during active growth was the most effective use.
- Taxon
- Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
- Treatment
- threefold at 0.15 L/hae1
- Outcome
- most effective use of NanoKremnye1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“studying the effect of tank mixtures of pesticides and bioactive substances on Vitis vinifera”
e1“the most effective use of NanoKremny was threefold at 0.15 L/ha during the periods of active growth and formation of vegetative and generative organs in grapevines”
Claim · model-written summary
NanoKremny can be used as a bioorganic additive in viticulture.
- Taxon
- Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
- Outcome
- be used as a bioorganic additive in viticulturee7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“studying the effect of tank mixtures of pesticides and bioactive substances on Vitis vinifera”
e7“this preparation can be used as a bioorganic additive in viticulture”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · quality: general · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →fertilization · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →nanoparticle · molecular: metabolites · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
nanoparticle · quality: general · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
nanoparticle · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →nanoparticle · quality: phytochemicals · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.