Paper · 2025 · SCIndeks

Impact of foliar nanocalcium fertilization on yield and wine characteristics of 'Vranac' wine grapes

Bakić, Ivana; Radonjić, Sanja; Mirović, Vasilije; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of foliar application of calcium nanofertilizer (Fitosmart®) on the yield and quality of Vitis vinifera L. (cv. 'Vranac') grapes. The experiment was conducted during the 2023 growing season at a commercial vineyard in Montenegro, where vines were treated with a 0.5% calcium nanofertilizer solution at three critical phenological stages: pre-bloom, post-bloom, and veraison. The results showed a significant increase in grapevine yield, primarily driven by an enhanced number of clusters per vine, while cluster weight exhibited only a minor increase. Chemical analysis revealed delayed sugar accumulation in treated grapes, which impacted must and wine composition by slightly reducing total soluble solids and final alcohol content. Treated wines demonstrated increased levels of total polyphenols and anthocyanins, factors that contribute to the sensory quality of red wines, including aroma authenticity, harmony, and overall impression. These findings suggest that the foliar application of nanocalcium fertilizers can enhance both grape yield and wine quality, making it a promising, sustainable alternative to conventional mineral fertilizers. However, further research is needed to explore its broader applicability across diverse climatic conditions and grapevine varieties.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar calcium nanofertilizer significantly increased grapevine yield.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Treatment
foliar application of calcium nanofertilizert0
Outcome
grapevine yielde0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“foliar application of calcium nanofertilizer (Fitosmart®) on the yield and quality of Vitis vinifera L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–141 · show in text ↑
e0

“The results showed a significant increase in grapevine yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–470 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar calcium nanofertilizer enhanced the number of clusters per vine.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Treatment
foliar application of calcium nanofertilizert0
Outcome
number of clusters per vinee0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“foliar application of calcium nanofertilizer (Fitosmart®) on the yield and quality of Vitis vinifera L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–141 · show in text ↑
e0

“primarily driven by an enhanced number of clusters per vine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–531 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar calcium nanofertilizer caused only a minor increase in cluster weight.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Treatment
foliar application of calcium nanofertilizert0
Outcome
cluster weighte0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
only a minore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“foliar application of calcium nanofertilizer (Fitosmart®) on the yield and quality of Vitis vinifera L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–141 · show in text ↑
e0

“while cluster weight exhibited only a minor increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–585 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated grapes showed delayed sugar accumulation.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Treatment
foliar application of calcium nanofertilizert0
Outcome
sugar accumulatione0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“foliar application of calcium nanofertilizer (Fitosmart®) on the yield and quality of Vitis vinifera L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–141 · show in text ↑
e0

“Chemical analysis revealed delayed sugar accumulation in treated grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–658 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated grapes had slightly reduced total soluble solids.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Treatment
foliar application of calcium nanofertilizert0
Outcome
total soluble solidse0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“foliar application of calcium nanofertilizer (Fitosmart®) on the yield and quality of Vitis vinifera L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–141 · show in text ↑
e0

“slightly reducing total soluble solids and final alcohol content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–768 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wine from treated grapes had slightly reduced final alcohol content.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Treatment
foliar application of calcium nanofertilizert0
Outcome
final alcohol contente0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“foliar application of calcium nanofertilizer (Fitosmart®) on the yield and quality of Vitis vinifera L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–141 · show in text ↑
e0

“slightly reducing total soluble solids and final alcohol content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–768 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wine from treated grapes had increased total polyphenols and anthocyanins.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Treatment
foliar application of calcium nanofertilizert0
Outcome
levels of total polyphenols and anthocyaninse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“foliar application of calcium nanofertilizer (Fitosmart®) on the yield and quality of Vitis vinifera L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–141 · show in text ↑
e0

“Treated wines demonstrated increased levels of total polyphenols and anthocyanins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–851 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

calcium atom · quality: phytochemicals · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · quality: phytochemicals · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

application · quality: sugar starch · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

application · molecular: metabolites · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

application · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 26 positive, 4 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: sugar starch · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nanoparticle · molecular: metabolites · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.