Paper · 2025 · Indonesian Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Analytics

The Effect of Potassium Fertilizer and Eco-Enzyme on the Growth and Production of Shallots (Allium ascalonicum L.)

Meylin Kristina Saragih; Pantas Simanjuntak; Lince Romauli Panataria; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the effect of potassium fertilizer and eco enzyme on the growth and production of Shallots (Allium et al.). The study used a Factorial Randomized Block Design (RAK) with two factors studied. The first factor was KCL fertilizer (K) with four levels, namely: K0 = No Application, K1 = 10 grams/plot (equivalent to 100 kg/ha), K2 = 15 grams/plot (equivalent to 150 kg/ha), K3 = 20 grams/plot (equivalent to 200 kg/ha), The second factor Eco Enzyme (P) 3 levels, namely: P1 = 7 ml/liter of water, P2 = 10 ml/liter of waterP3 = 13 ml/liter of water. The results showed that potassium treatment significantly affected plant height 5 MST but had no significant impact at the ages of 2, 3, and 4 MST and the number of bulbs per sample. Eco-enzyme treatment had no significant effect on plant height or number of bulbs per sample. The interaction between potassium fertilizer and eco-enzyme had no significant effect on plant height and number of tubers per sample.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium affected shallot height at 5 MST.

Organ / stage
5 MSTe0
Treatment
potassium treatmente0
Outcome
plant heighte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“potassium treatment significantly affected plant height 5 MST”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–660 · show in text ↑
t0

“Shallots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium had no significant impact on shallot height at 2, 3, and 4 MST.

Organ / stage
2, 3, and 4 MSTe0
Treatment
potassium treatmente0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
no significant impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“potassium treatment significantly affected plant height 5 MST but had no significant impact at the ages of 2, 3, and 4 MST”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–721 · show in text ↑
t0

“Shallots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium had no significant impact on bulbs per sample.

Treatment
Potassium Fertilizert0
Outcome
number of bulbs per samplee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the number of bulbs per sample”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–756 · show in text ↑
t0

“The Effect of Potassium Fertilizer and Eco-Enzyme on the Growth and Production of Shallots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Eco-enzyme had no significant effect on height or bulbs per sample.

Treatment
Eco-enzyme treatmente0
Outcome
plant height or number of bulbs per samplee0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eco-enzyme treatment had no significant effect on plant height or number of bulbs per sample”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–850 · show in text ↑
t0

“Shallots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The fertilizer interaction had no significant effect on height or tubers per sample.

Treatment
interaction between potassium fertilizer and eco-enzymee0
Outcome
plant height and number of tubers per samplee0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction between potassium fertilizer and eco-enzyme had no significant effect on plant height and number of tubers per sample”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–985 · show in text ↑
t0

“Shallots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–90 · show in text ↑

potassium · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 25 positive, 1 negative or no effect

25 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

fertilization · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

530 papers: 464 positive, 66 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 464 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

526 papers more in this group

See all 530 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.