Paper · 2025 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Biostimulators in sustainable agriculture: the example of red lettuce

Yusuf Kacar; Kamile Ulukapi

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The aim of this study was to demonstrate the potential use of biostimulants, based on the hypothesis that the use of biostimulants can be an alternative to ensure sustainability in agricultural production. In the study, red lettuce (Lactuca sativa cv Crispa), which attracts consumer attention due to its color, was used as a model crop and seven biostimulants at different levels were applied to lettuce in two growing seasons. The effects of the biostimulants on yield, quality, vitamin C, macro-micro nutrient content and nitrate accumulation were investigated. In the first season (November–January), the biostimulant containing gamma-aminobutyric acid and L-glutamic acid gave better results than the conventional treatment in terms of marketable leaf number, average head weight and marketable yield, which are important yield criteria. In addition, measurements of root length, root collar diameter and fresh root weight of the biostimulants containing Lactobacillus acidophilus showed that the biostimulants supported plant growth more than the conventional treatment in the first growing season. The dominance of the conventional treatment in the second growing season (January–April) with relatively colder weather conditions showed that the efficacy of biostimulants was related to air temperature. On the other hand, biostimulants containing Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus paracasei increased vitamin C content and red color intensity of lettuce. It was concluded that biostimulants will contribute to sustainable agriculture by helping to reduce the use of synthetic chemical fertilizers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The gamma-aminobutyric acid and L-glutamic acid biostimulant improved marketable leaf number, head weight and marketable yield over conventional treatment in the first season.

Taxon
red lettucet0
Treatment
biostimulant containing gamma-aminobutyric acid and L-glutamic acide0
Outcome
marketable leaf number, average head weight and marketable yielde0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
first season (November–January)e0
Comparator
conventional treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“In the first season (November–January), the biostimulant containing gamma-aminobutyric acid and L-glutamic acid gave better results than the conventional treatment in terms of marketable leaf number, average head weight and marketable yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–805 · show in text ↑
t0

“red lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lactobacillus acidophilus biostimulants supported root growth measures more than conventional treatment in the first season.

Taxon
red lettucet0
Treatment
biostimulants containing Lactobacillus acidophiluse0
Interactor
Lactobacillus acidophilusLactobacillus acidophiluse0symbiont
Outcome
root length, root collar diameter and fresh root weighte0
Direction
more thane0
Comparator
conventional treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactobacillus acidophilus
Lactobacillus acidophilus · InteractorMogana Das Murtey and Patchamuthu Ramasamy · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“measurements of root length, root collar diameter and fresh root weight of the biostimulants containing Lactobacillus acidophilus showed that the biostimulants supported plant growth more than the conventional treatment in the first growing season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“red lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional treatment performed better in the colder second growing season.

Taxon
red lettucet0
Outcome
dominance of the conventional treatmente0
Qualifier
second growing season (January–April) with relatively colder weather conditionse0

Verbatim

e0

“The dominance of the conventional treatment in the second growing season (January–April) with relatively colder weather conditions showed that the efficacy of biostimulants was related to air temperature.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1309 · show in text ↑
t0

“red lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–69 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biostimulant efficacy was related to air temperature.

Taxon
red lettucet0
Treatment
biostimulantse0
Outcome
efficacy of biostimulantse0
Qualifier
air temperaturee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“the efficacy of biostimulants was related to air temperature.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1309 · show in text ↑
t0

“red lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lactobacillus acidophilus biostimulants increased lettuce vitamin C content and red color intensity.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
biostimulants containing Lactobacillus acidophiluse0
Interactor
Lactobacillus acidophilusLactobacillus acidophiluse0symbiont
Outcome
vitamin C content and red color intensitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lactobacillus acidophilus
Lactobacillus acidophilus · InteractorMogana Das Murtey and Patchamuthu Ramasamy · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biostimulants containing Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus paracasei increased vitamin C content and red color intensity of lettuce.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1471 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lactobacillus paracasei biostimulants increased lettuce vitamin C content and red color intensity.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
Lactobacillus paracaseie0
Interactor
Lactobacillus paracaseiLacticaseibacillus paracaseie0symbiont
Outcome
vitamin C content and red color intensitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lacticaseibacillus paracasei
Lacticaseibacillus paracasei · InteractorDr. Horst Neve, Max Rubner-Institut · CC BY-SA 3.0 de · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biostimulants containing Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus paracasei increased vitamin C content and red color intensity of lettuce.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1471 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that biostimulants could help reduce synthetic chemical fertilizer use.

Taxon
red lettucet0
Outcome
reduce the use of synthetic chemical fertilizerse0

Verbatim

e0

“It was concluded that biostimulants will contribute to sustainable agriculture by helping to reduce the use of synthetic chemical fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1472–1614 · show in text ↑
t0

“red lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–69 · show in text ↑

other · quality: phytochemicals · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.