Abstract
The field experiment was conducted to study the effect of micronutrients on growth and yield of onion (cv.Taherpuri) in High Ganges River Floodplain Soils (AEZ 11) during the period from November 2008 to February 2009.The experimental field soil was medium fertile with pH = 7.6 and silty loam in texture.The micronutrient combinations viz.T1=control, T2=Zn, T3=B, T4=Zn+B, T5=Zn+B+Mo, T6=Zn+B+Mn, T7=Zn+B+Cu, T8=Zn+B+Cl, T9=Zn+B+Mo+Mn, T10=Zn+B+Mo+Mn, T11=Zn+B+Mo+Cu+Cl and laid out in RCBD with three replications.The rate of micronutrients were Zn:B:Mo:Mn:Cu:Cl=3:3:0.5:4:1:20 kg/ha in the treatments and also N:P:K:S=50:50:100:20 kg/ha used as basal.The results were found to be significant in most of the yield contributing parametrs of onion.The maximum yield and yield contributing parameters of onion i.e. leaves/plant (14.63), plant height (61.30cm), diameter of bulb (14.97 mm), fresh weight of leaves (31.42 g), fresh weight of bulb (9.21g), diameter of bulb (4.36 cm) and bulb yield (13.38 t/ha) were obtained from T4 (Zn + B) but splitting of bulb (9.72) in T7 (Zn + B + Cu) and fresh weight of roots (1513 mg) in T6 (Zn + B + Mn).The minimum growth and yield contributing parameters were recorded in control (T1).The response of Zn is more than B but both are statistically similar in most cases and the combination of (Zn + B) is better for vegetative growth and yield of onion.It can be concluded that the response of different micronutrients for onion cultivation in calcareous soils can be expressed the following orders: Zn+B>Zn>B>Mo.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Zn plus B produced 14.63 leaves per onion plant.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“onion”
e0“The maximum yield and yield contributing parameters of onion i.e. leaves/plant (14.63), plant height (61.30cm), diameter of bulb (14.97 mm), fresh weight of leaves (31.42 g), fresh weight of bulb (9.21g), diameter of bulb (4.36 cm) and bulb yield (13.38 t/ha) were obtained from T4 (Zn + B)”
Claim · model-written summary
Zn plus B produced 61.30cm onion plant height.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“onion”
e0“The maximum yield and yield contributing parameters of onion i.e. leaves/plant (14.63), plant height (61.30cm), diameter of bulb (14.97 mm), fresh weight of leaves (31.42 g), fresh weight of bulb (9.21g), diameter of bulb (4.36 cm) and bulb yield (13.38 t/ha) were obtained from T4 (Zn + B)”
Claim · model-written summary
Zn plus B produced the reported 14.97 mm bulb diameter.
- Taxon
- onion
Allium cepat0 - Treatment
- T4 (Zn + B)e0
- Outcome
- diameter of bulbe0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 14.97 mme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“onion”
e0“The maximum yield and yield contributing parameters of onion i.e. leaves/plant (14.63), plant height (61.30cm), diameter of bulb (14.97 mm), fresh weight of leaves (31.42 g), fresh weight of bulb (9.21g), diameter of bulb (4.36 cm) and bulb yield (13.38 t/ha) were obtained from T4 (Zn + B)”
Claim · model-written summary
Zn plus B produced 31.42 g fresh leaf weight.
- Taxon
- onion
Allium cepat0 - Treatment
- T4 (Zn + B)e0
- Outcome
- fresh weight of leavese0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 31.42 ge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“onion”
e0“The maximum yield and yield contributing parameters of onion i.e. leaves/plant (14.63), plant height (61.30cm), diameter of bulb (14.97 mm), fresh weight of leaves (31.42 g), fresh weight of bulb (9.21g), diameter of bulb (4.36 cm) and bulb yield (13.38 t/ha) were obtained from T4 (Zn + B)”
Claim · model-written summary
Zn plus B produced 9.21g fresh bulb weight.
- Taxon
- onion
Allium cepat0 - Treatment
- T4 (Zn + B)e0
- Outcome
- fresh weight of bulbe0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 9.21ge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“onion”
e0“The maximum yield and yield contributing parameters of onion i.e. leaves/plant (14.63), plant height (61.30cm), diameter of bulb (14.97 mm), fresh weight of leaves (31.42 g), fresh weight of bulb (9.21g), diameter of bulb (4.36 cm) and bulb yield (13.38 t/ha) were obtained from T4 (Zn + B)”
Claim · model-written summary
Zn plus B produced the separately reported 4.36 cm bulb diameter.
- Taxon
- onion
Allium cepat0 - Treatment
- T4 (Zn + B)e0
- Outcome
- diameter of bulbe0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 4.36 cme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“onion”
e0“The maximum yield and yield contributing parameters of onion i.e. leaves/plant (14.63), plant height (61.30cm), diameter of bulb (14.97 mm), fresh weight of leaves (31.42 g), fresh weight of bulb (9.21g), diameter of bulb (4.36 cm) and bulb yield (13.38 t/ha) were obtained from T4 (Zn + B)”
Claim · model-written summary
Zn plus B produced 13.38 t/ha bulb yield.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“onion”
e0“The maximum yield and yield contributing parameters of onion i.e. leaves/plant (14.63), plant height (61.30cm), diameter of bulb (14.97 mm), fresh weight of leaves (31.42 g), fresh weight of bulb (9.21g), diameter of bulb (4.36 cm) and bulb yield (13.38 t/ha) were obtained from T4 (Zn + B)”
Claim · model-written summary
Zn plus B plus Cu produced 9.72 bulb splitting.
- Taxon
- onion
Allium cepat0 - Treatment
- T7 (Zn + B + Cu)e0
- Outcome
- splitting of bulbe0
- Value
- 9.72e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“onion”
e0“but splitting of bulb (9.72) in T7 (Zn + B + Cu)”
Claim · model-written summary
Zn plus B plus Mn produced 1513 mg fresh root weight.
- Taxon
- onion
Allium cepat0 - Treatment
- T6 (Zn + B + Mn)e0
- Outcome
- fresh weight of rootse0
- Value
- 1513 mge0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“onion”
e0“fresh weight of roots (1513 mg) in T6 (Zn + B + Mn)”
Claim · model-written summary
Control plants had the lowest growth and yield parameters.
- Taxon
- onion
Allium cepat0 - Treatment
- control (T1)e0
- Outcome
- growth and yield contributing parameterse0
- Direction
- minimume0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“onion”
e0“The minimum growth and yield contributing parameters were recorded in control (T1).”
Claim · model-written summary
Zn had a larger response than B, though the two were statistically similar in most cases.
- Taxon
- onion
Allium cepat0 - Treatment
- Zne0
- Outcome
- responsee0
- Direction
- moree0
- Qualifier
- statistically similar in most casese0
- Comparator
- Be0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“onion”
e0“The response of Zn is more than B but both are statistically similar in most cases”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors judged Zn plus B better for onion vegetative growth and yield.
- Taxon
- onion
Allium cepat0 - Treatment
- (Zn + B)e0
- Outcome
- vegetative growth and yielde0
- Direction
- bettere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“onion”
e0“the combination of (Zn + B) is better for vegetative growth and yield of onion.”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors ranked onion micronutrient responses Zn+B above Zn above B above Mo.
- Taxon
- onion
Allium cepat0 - Outcome
- Zn+B>Zn>B>Moe0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“onion”
e0“the following orders: Zn+B>Zn>B>Mo.”
The same questions in other papers
zinc atom · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →zinc atom · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ
32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
32 papers more in this group
See all 36 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.