Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Biosciences (IJB)

Effect of micronutrients on growth and yield of onion under problematic soil environment

B. M. Mahmudul Hasan

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The field experiment was conducted to study the effect of micronutrients on growth and yield of onion (cv.Taherpuri) in High Ganges River Floodplain Soils (AEZ 11) during the period from November 2008 to February 2009.The experimental field soil was medium fertile with pH = 7.6 and silty loam in texture.The micronutrient combinations viz.T1=control, T2=Zn, T3=B, T4=Zn+B, T5=Zn+B+Mo, T6=Zn+B+Mn, T7=Zn+B+Cu, T8=Zn+B+Cl, T9=Zn+B+Mo+Mn, T10=Zn+B+Mo+Mn, T11=Zn+B+Mo+Cu+Cl and laid out in RCBD with three replications.The rate of micronutrients were Zn:B:Mo:Mn:Cu:Cl=3:3:0.5:4:1:20 kg/ha in the treatments and also N:P:K:S=50:50:100:20 kg/ha used as basal.The results were found to be significant in most of the yield contributing parametrs of onion.The maximum yield and yield contributing parameters of onion i.e. leaves/plant (14.63), plant height (61.30cm), diameter of bulb (14.97 mm), fresh weight of leaves (31.42 g), fresh weight of bulb (9.21g), diameter of bulb (4.36 cm) and bulb yield (13.38 t/ha) were obtained from T4 (Zn + B) but splitting of bulb (9.72) in T7 (Zn + B + Cu) and fresh weight of roots (1513 mg) in T6 (Zn + B + Mn).The minimum growth and yield contributing parameters were recorded in control (T1).The response of Zn is more than B but both are statistically similar in most cases and the combination of (Zn + B) is better for vegetative growth and yield of onion.It can be concluded that the response of different micronutrients for onion cultivation in calcareous soils can be expressed the following orders: Zn+B>Zn>B>Mo.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn plus B produced 14.63 leaves per onion plant.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
T4 (Zn + B)e0
Outcome
leaves/plante0
Direction
maximume0
Value
14.63e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum yield and yield contributing parameters of onion i.e. leaves/plant (14.63), plant height (61.30cm), diameter of bulb (14.97 mm), fresh weight of leaves (31.42 g), fresh weight of bulb (9.21g), diameter of bulb (4.36 cm) and bulb yield (13.38 t/ha) were obtained from T4 (Zn + B)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–1038 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn plus B produced 61.30cm onion plant height.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
T4 (Zn + B)e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
61.30cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum yield and yield contributing parameters of onion i.e. leaves/plant (14.63), plant height (61.30cm), diameter of bulb (14.97 mm), fresh weight of leaves (31.42 g), fresh weight of bulb (9.21g), diameter of bulb (4.36 cm) and bulb yield (13.38 t/ha) were obtained from T4 (Zn + B)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–1038 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn plus B produced the reported 14.97 mm bulb diameter.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
T4 (Zn + B)e0
Outcome
diameter of bulbe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
14.97 mme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum yield and yield contributing parameters of onion i.e. leaves/plant (14.63), plant height (61.30cm), diameter of bulb (14.97 mm), fresh weight of leaves (31.42 g), fresh weight of bulb (9.21g), diameter of bulb (4.36 cm) and bulb yield (13.38 t/ha) were obtained from T4 (Zn + B)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–1038 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn plus B produced 31.42 g fresh leaf weight.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
T4 (Zn + B)e0
Outcome
fresh weight of leavese0
Direction
maximume0
Value
31.42 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum yield and yield contributing parameters of onion i.e. leaves/plant (14.63), plant height (61.30cm), diameter of bulb (14.97 mm), fresh weight of leaves (31.42 g), fresh weight of bulb (9.21g), diameter of bulb (4.36 cm) and bulb yield (13.38 t/ha) were obtained from T4 (Zn + B)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–1038 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn plus B produced 9.21g fresh bulb weight.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
T4 (Zn + B)e0
Outcome
fresh weight of bulbe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
9.21ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum yield and yield contributing parameters of onion i.e. leaves/plant (14.63), plant height (61.30cm), diameter of bulb (14.97 mm), fresh weight of leaves (31.42 g), fresh weight of bulb (9.21g), diameter of bulb (4.36 cm) and bulb yield (13.38 t/ha) were obtained from T4 (Zn + B)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–1038 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn plus B produced the separately reported 4.36 cm bulb diameter.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
T4 (Zn + B)e0
Outcome
diameter of bulbe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
4.36 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum yield and yield contributing parameters of onion i.e. leaves/plant (14.63), plant height (61.30cm), diameter of bulb (14.97 mm), fresh weight of leaves (31.42 g), fresh weight of bulb (9.21g), diameter of bulb (4.36 cm) and bulb yield (13.38 t/ha) were obtained from T4 (Zn + B)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–1038 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn plus B produced 13.38 t/ha bulb yield.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
T4 (Zn + B)e0
Outcome
bulb yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
13.38 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum yield and yield contributing parameters of onion i.e. leaves/plant (14.63), plant height (61.30cm), diameter of bulb (14.97 mm), fresh weight of leaves (31.42 g), fresh weight of bulb (9.21g), diameter of bulb (4.36 cm) and bulb yield (13.38 t/ha) were obtained from T4 (Zn + B)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–1038 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn plus B plus Cu produced 9.72 bulb splitting.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
T7 (Zn + B + Cu)e0
Outcome
splitting of bulbe0
Value
9.72e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“but splitting of bulb (9.72) in T7 (Zn + B + Cu)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1087 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn plus B plus Mn produced 1513 mg fresh root weight.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
T6 (Zn + B + Mn)e0
Outcome
fresh weight of rootse0
Value
1513 mge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“fresh weight of roots (1513 mg) in T6 (Zn + B + Mn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1143 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control plants had the lowest growth and yield parameters.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
control (T1)e0
Outcome
growth and yield contributing parameterse0
Direction
minimume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“The minimum growth and yield contributing parameters were recorded in control (T1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1227 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn had a larger response than B, though the two were statistically similar in most cases.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
Zne0
Outcome
responsee0
Direction
moree0
Qualifier
statistically similar in most casese0
Comparator
Be0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“The response of Zn is more than B but both are statistically similar in most cases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1309 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors judged Zn plus B better for onion vegetative growth and yield.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
(Zn + B)e0
Outcome
vegetative growth and yielde0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“the combination of (Zn + B) is better for vegetative growth and yield of onion.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1393 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors ranked onion micronutrient responses Zn+B above Zn above B above Mo.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Outcome
Zn+B>Zn>B>Moe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“the following orders: Zn+B>Zn>B>Mo.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1518–1553 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

25 papers: 22 positive, 3 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

36 papers: 33 positive, 3 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
    FYM, NPK and sulfur, with or without boron and zinc, gave maximum bulb weight.

    Response of Onion to NPK, S and Micronutrients · 2020

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  3. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.