Paper · 2025 · ACTA SCIENTIFIC MICROBIOLOGY

Biocontrol Potential of Pochonia chlamydosporia Against Meloidogyne incognita in Okra

Joshi Chinmay; Zala Viren; Pandya Amit; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This study evaluates the efficacy of the biocontrol agent Ami Pochonia chlamydosporia in managing root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne incognita) in okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) cultivation at the Ami Experimental Farm in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, over a year.The analysis used a randomized block design and comprised two treatments: one with P. chlamydosporia, a seed treatment and soil amendment at 1 kg per acre, and a control group with no treatment.The results showed that the treated plants had substantially enhanced growth parameters, with average heights of 156.34 cm versus 101.65 cm in the control, root lengths increasing from 24.23 cm to 47.16 cm, dry shoot weights increasing from 13.11 g to 21.53 g, and dry root weights increasing from 2.25 g to 7.43 g.Furthermore, Ami P. chlamydosporia decreased the root-knot index from 5.45 to 1.45 and nematode populations by 52.34%, from 371.34 to 219.18.The treatment also increased yield by 30.05%, to 5.09 t/ha, compared to 4.12 t/ha in the control.The Incremental Cost-Benefit Ratio (ICBR) of 1.91 demonstrates considerable financial benefits; promoting the conclusion that P. chlamydosporia is a viable and sustainable approach to reducing root-knot nematodes in okra, increasing crop yields, and maintaining soil health.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pochonia treatment increased average okra height from 101.65 to 156.34 cm.

Treatment
Pochonia chlamydosporiat0
Interactor
Pochonia chlamydosporiaPochonia chlamydosporiat0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
average heightse0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
156.34 cme0
Qualifier
101.65 cme0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treated plants had substantially enhanced growth parameters, with average heights of 156.34 cm versus 101.65 cm in the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–599 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pochonia chlamydosporia Against Meloidogyne incognita in Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pochonia treatment increased okra root length from 24.23 to 47.16 cm.

Treatment
Pochonia chlamydosporiat0
Interactor
Pochonia chlamydosporiaPochonia chlamydosporiat0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
root lengthse0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
47.16 cme0
Qualifier
24.23 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root lengths increasing from 24.23 cm to 47.16 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–650 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pochonia chlamydosporia Against Meloidogyne incognita in Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pochonia treatment increased okra dry shoot weight from 13.11 to 21.53 g.

Treatment
Pochonia chlamydosporiat0
Interactor
Pochonia chlamydosporiaPochonia chlamydosporiat0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
dry shoot weightse0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
21.53 ge0
Qualifier
13.11 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry shoot weights increasing from 13.11 g to 21.53 g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–704 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pochonia chlamydosporia Against Meloidogyne incognita in Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pochonia treatment increased okra dry root weight from 2.25 to 7.43 g.

Treatment
Pochonia chlamydosporiat0
Interactor
Pochonia chlamydosporiaPochonia chlamydosporiat0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
dry root weightse0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
7.43 ge0
Qualifier
2.25 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry root weights increasing from 2.25 g to 7.43 g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–759 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pochonia chlamydosporia Against Meloidogyne incognita in Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pochonia treatment decreased the root-knot index from 5.45 to 1.45.

Treatment
P. chlamydosporiae0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Second interactor
Pochonia chlamydosporiaPochonia chlamydosporiat0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
root-knot indexe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
1.45e0
Qualifier
5.45e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ami P. chlamydosporia decreased the root-knot index from 5.45 to 1.45”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–842 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pochonia chlamydosporia Against Meloidogyne incognita in Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pochonia treatment reduced nematode populations by 52.34%, from 371.34 to 219.18.

Treatment
Pochonia chlamydosporiat0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Second interactor
Pochonia chlamydosporiaPochonia chlamydosporiat0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
nematode populationse0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
52.34%e0
Qualifier
from 371.34 to 219.18e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nematode populations by 52.34%, from 371.34 to 219.18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–900 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pochonia chlamydosporia Against Meloidogyne incognita in Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pochonia treatment increased okra yield by 30.05%, to 5.09 t/ha versus 4.12 t/ha.

Treatment
Pochonia chlamydosporiat0
Interactor
Pochonia chlamydosporiaPochonia chlamydosporiat0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
30.05%e0
Qualifier
4.12 t/hae0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment also increased yield by 30.05%, to 5.09 t/ha, compared to 4.12 t/ha in the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–997 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pochonia chlamydosporia Against Meloidogyne incognita in Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment had an incremental cost-benefit ratio of 1.91.

Outcome
Incremental Cost-Benefit Ratioe0
Value
1.91e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Incremental Cost-Benefit Ratio (ICBR) of 1.91 demonstrates considerable financial benefits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1092 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pochonia chlamydosporia Against Meloidogyne incognita in Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–85 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors consider Pochonia a viable sustainable way to reduce root-knot nematodes in okra.

Interactor
P. chlamydosporiaPochonia chlamydosporiae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
reducing root-knot nematodes in okrae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P. chlamydosporia is a viable and sustainable approach to reducing root-knot nematodes in okra, increasing crop yields, and maintaining soil health”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1271 · show in text ↑

Pochonia chlamydosporia · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Pochonia chlamydosporia · Meloidogyne incognita · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.