Paper · 2025 · Stress Biology

Evaluation of the responses of contrasting sensitive and tolerant rice genotypes to arsenic stress

Poonam Yadav; Meghna Jaiswal; Sudhakar Srivastava

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract The threats of arsenic (As) contamination of rice grains and rice-based food products are being experienced globally. Arsenic toxicity to rice ( Oryza sativa L. ) affects its production and grain quality. In this work, screening of 67 rice genotypes was performed against As stress (25 µM and 50 µM, in the form of arsenite [As(III)]) for 7d in lab conditions on the basis of germination and early growth of seedlings. Germination percentage, root and shoot length, and seedling vigour were analyzed. The genotypes showed a wide range of variation in germination percentage, and seedling growth in response to both control and As(III) stress. The comparative evaluation of genotypes could demarcate them into sensitive (e.g. Shobhini and DRR Dhan-41) and tolerant (e.g. Pooja and Vivek Dhan) categories. To further investigate the behavior of contrasting varieties, a tolerant (Pooja) and moderately sensitive (CO-50) variety of rice were subjected to As stress for variable concentrations (0–25 µM; fixed duration 5 d) and duration (1–15 d; fixed concentration 25 µM). The accumulation of As by tolerant and sensitive varieties in roots, old leaves and young leaves was found to be significantly lower in Pooja than in CO-50. The differential As accumulation reflected in growth and biochemical responses (malondialdehyde level, superoxide dismutase activity and total non-protein thiols). The results demonstrate the potential of using contrasting rice varieties for future breeding or gene editing approaches to develop low arsenic accumulating rice cultivars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice genotypes varied widely in germination percentage and seedling growth under control and As(III) stress.

Treatment
As(III) stresse1
Outcome
germination percentage, and seedling growthe1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of the responses of contrasting sensitive and tolerant rice genotypes to arsenic stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“The genotypes showed a wide range of variation in germination percentage, and seedling growth in response to both control and As(III) stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–650 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice genotypes could be classed as sensitive (Shobhini, DRR Dhan-41) or tolerant (Pooja, Vivek Dhan) in the screen.

Material
Shobhini and DRR Dhan-41e5
Outcome
demarcate them into sensitive (e.g. Shobhini and DRR Dhan-41) and tolerant (e.g. Pooja and Vivek Dhan) categoriese5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of the responses of contrasting sensitive and tolerant rice genotypes to arsenic stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
e5

“The comparative evaluation of genotypes could demarcate them into sensitive (e.g. Shobhini and DRR Dhan-41) and tolerant (e.g. Pooja and Vivek Dhan) categories”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–811 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Arsenic accumulation was significantly lower in Pooja than in CO-50 in roots, old leaves and young leaves under arsenic stress.

Material
Poojae3
Organ / stage
roots, old leaves and young leavese3
Treatment
As stresse2
Outcome
accumulation of Ase3
Direction
significantly lowere3
Comparator
CO-50e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of the responses of contrasting sensitive and tolerant rice genotypes to arsenic stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
e2

“were subjected to As stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–970 · show in text ↑
e3

“The accumulation of As by tolerant and sensitive varieties in roots, old leaves and young leaves was found to be significantly lower in Pooja than in CO-50”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1234 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The differential arsenic accumulation was reflected in growth and biochemical responses of rice.

Treatment
differential As accumulatione4
Outcome
growth and biochemical responsese4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of the responses of contrasting sensitive and tolerant rice genotypes to arsenic stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
e4

“The differential As accumulation reflected in growth and biochemical responses (malondialdehyde level, superoxide dismutase activity and total non-protein thiols)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1398 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Contrasting rice varieties could be used in breeding or gene editing to develop low arsenic accumulating rice cultivars.

Outcome
develop low arsenic accumulating rice cultivarse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of the responses of contrasting sensitive and tolerant rice genotypes to arsenic stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
e6

“The results demonstrate the potential of using contrasting rice varieties for future breeding or gene editing approaches to develop low arsenic accumulating rice cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1571 · show in text ↑

arsenic atom · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 8 positive, 7 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

heavy metal · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 7 positive, 14 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.