Paper · 2024 · Niva Povolzh`ia

PARAMETERS OF METHODS FOR THE EFFECTIVE CULTIVATION OF GRAIN SORGHUM IN THE DRY CONDITIONS OF DONBASS

A.V. BARANOVSKY

19
claims
43
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The article presents the results of a series of field experiments with grain sorghum conducted on the experimental field of ‘Lugansk SAU' in 2008-2022. It was found that modern grain sorghum hybrids with 99-110 days vegetation period (Solarius, Fulgus, Sprint W, Swift, Frisket, Puma Star, Burggo, Oggana, Targgo, PR88Y20) are more productive (5.56-5.96 t/ha), with a maximum economic effect in cultivation (conditional net income – 35,235-40,035 rub./ha, profitability level – 111.9-127.2 %) at the lowest cost of grain (5,283-5,663 rub./t). The cultivation of early and mid-ripening hybrids was less lucrative and profitable. It has been proven that the optimal and economically justified sowing dates for early ripening hybrids are between April 25 and May 15, for mid-early hybrids between April 25 and May 5 and for mid-ripening hybrids at the permitted early date of April 25. It has been proven that the cultivation of grain sorghum is unprofitable without the use of herbicides. With a complex of mechanical weed control measures in sorghum crops, the maximum conditional net income (44,403-44,457 rub./ha) and profitability level (141.2-140.6 %) at the lowest grain cost (4,974-4,988 rub./t) is achieved by applying both soil (Primextra Gold, 72 SC, 3.0 l/ha) and post-emergence (Balerina, SE, 0.4 l/ha or Dialen Super, aq. sol, 0.7 l/ha) herbicides. In this case, the crop yield increases by 4.28-4.30 t/ha (3.1 times) and the costs for grains decrease by 2.7 times. The use of mineral fertilizers (N60P40) increased the conditional net income with shallow (12-14 cm) basic tillage (UDA-2.4-20M) by 3,860 rub./ha (12.0 %), and with deep (25-27 cm) plowing (PLN-3-35) – by 3,740 rub./ha (10.2%). With N60P40, deep mouldboard plowing compared to shallow tillage increased conditional net income by 11.3 %, profitability by 10.0 %,and reduced the cost of grain by 4.4 %.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Modern grain sorghum hybrids with 99-110 day vegetation periods are more productive (5.56-5.96 t/ha).

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Material
modern grain sorghum hybrids with 99-110 days vegetation periode2
Outcome
more productivee2
Value
5.56-5.96 t/hae2
Setting
experimental field of ‘Lugansk SAU'e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CULTIVATION OF GRAIN SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“conducted on the experimental field of ‘Lugansk SAU' in 2008-2022”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 85–150 · show in text ↑
e2

“modern grain sorghum hybrids with 99-110 days vegetation period (Solarius, Fulgus, Sprint W, Swift, Frisket, Puma Star, Burggo, Oggana, Targgo, PR88Y20) are more productive (5.56-5.96 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–359 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest conditional net income (35,235-40,035 rub./ha) was obtained with the best hybrids.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Outcome
conditional net incomee3
Direction
maximum economic effecte3
Value
35,235-40,035 rub./hae3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CULTIVATION OF GRAIN SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–68 · show in text ↑
e3

“with a maximum economic effect in cultivation (conditional net income – 35,235-40,035 rub./ha, profitability level – 111.9-127.2 %) at the lowest cost of grain (5,283-5,663 rub./t)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–541 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Profitability level of the best hybrids was 111.9-127.2%.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Outcome
profitability levele3
Direction
maximum economic effecte3
Value
111.9-127.2 %e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CULTIVATION OF GRAIN SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–68 · show in text ↑
e3

“with a maximum economic effect in cultivation (conditional net income – 35,235-40,035 rub./ha, profitability level – 111.9-127.2 %) at the lowest cost of grain (5,283-5,663 rub./t)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–541 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest cost of grain (5,283-5,663 rub./t) was obtained with the best hybrids.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Outcome
cost of graine3
Direction
loweste3
Value
5,283-5,663 rub./te3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CULTIVATION OF GRAIN SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–68 · show in text ↑
e3

“with a maximum economic effect in cultivation (conditional net income – 35,235-40,035 rub./ha, profitability level – 111.9-127.2 %) at the lowest cost of grain (5,283-5,663 rub./t)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–541 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early and mid-ripening hybrids were less lucrative and profitable.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Material
early and mid-ripening hybridse4
Outcome
lucrative and profitablee4
Direction
lesse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CULTIVATION OF GRAIN SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–68 · show in text ↑
e4

“The cultivation of early and mid-ripening hybrids was less lucrative and profitable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–626 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal and economically justified sowing for early ripening hybrids is between April 25 and May 15.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Material
early ripening hybridse5
Outcome
optimal and economically justified sowing dates for early ripening hybridse5
Value
between April 25 and May 15e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CULTIVATION OF GRAIN SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–68 · show in text ↑
e5

“optimal and economically justified sowing dates for early ripening hybrids are between April 25 and May 15”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–762 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal and economically justified sowing for mid-early hybrids is between April 25 and May 5.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Material
mid-early hybridse6
Outcome
optimal and economically justified sowing dates for early ripening hybridse5
Value
between April 25 and May 5e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CULTIVATION OF GRAIN SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–68 · show in text ↑
e5

“optimal and economically justified sowing dates for early ripening hybrids are between April 25 and May 15”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–762 · show in text ↑
e6

“for mid-early hybrids between April 25 and May 5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–812 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal and economically justified sowing for mid-ripening hybrids is at the permitted early date of April 25.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Material
mid-ripening hybridse7
Outcome
optimal and economically justified sowing dates for early ripening hybridse5
Value
at the permitted early date of April 25e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CULTIVATION OF GRAIN SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–68 · show in text ↑
e5

“optimal and economically justified sowing dates for early ripening hybrids are between April 25 and May 15”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–762 · show in text ↑
e7

“for mid-ripening hybrids at the permitted early date of April 25”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–881 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivation of grain sorghum is unprofitable without herbicides.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
use of herbicidese0
Outcome
unprofitablee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CULTIVATION OF GRAIN SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“It has been proven that the cultivation of grain sorghum is unprofitable without the use of herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–985 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicides with mechanical weed control gave the maximum conditional net income (44,403-44,457 rub./ha).

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
herbicidese1
Outcome
conditional net incomee1
Direction
maximume1
Value
44,403-44,457 rub./hae1
Qualifier
With a complex of mechanical weed control measures in sorghum cropse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CULTIVATION OF GRAIN SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“With a complex of mechanical weed control measures in sorghum crops, the maximum conditional net income (44,403-44,457 rub./ha) and profitability level (141.2-140.6 %) at the lowest grain cost (4,974-4,988 rub./t) is achieved by applying both soil (Primextra Gold, 72 SC, 3.0 l/ha) and post-emergence (Balerina, SE, 0.4 l/ha or Dialen Super, aq. sol, 0.7 l/ha) herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1358 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicides with mechanical weed control gave the maximum profitability level (141.2-140.6%).

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
herbicidese1
Outcome
profitability levele1
Direction
maximume1
Value
141.2-140.6 %e1
Qualifier
With a complex of mechanical weed control measures in sorghum cropse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CULTIVATION OF GRAIN SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“With a complex of mechanical weed control measures in sorghum crops, the maximum conditional net income (44,403-44,457 rub./ha) and profitability level (141.2-140.6 %) at the lowest grain cost (4,974-4,988 rub./t) is achieved by applying both soil (Primextra Gold, 72 SC, 3.0 l/ha) and post-emergence (Balerina, SE, 0.4 l/ha or Dialen Super, aq. sol, 0.7 l/ha) herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1358 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicides with mechanical weed control gave the lowest grain cost (4,974-4,988 rub./t).

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
herbicidese1
Outcome
grain coste1
Direction
loweste1
Value
4,974-4,988 rub./te1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CULTIVATION OF GRAIN SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“With a complex of mechanical weed control measures in sorghum crops, the maximum conditional net income (44,403-44,457 rub./ha) and profitability level (141.2-140.6 %) at the lowest grain cost (4,974-4,988 rub./t) is achieved by applying both soil (Primextra Gold, 72 SC, 3.0 l/ha) and post-emergence (Balerina, SE, 0.4 l/ha or Dialen Super, aq. sol, 0.7 l/ha) herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1358 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicides increased the crop yield by 4.28-4.30 t/ha (3.1 times).

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
herbicidese1
Outcome
crop yielde2
Direction
increasese2
Value
4.28-4.30 t/ha (3.1 times)e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CULTIVATION OF GRAIN SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“With a complex of mechanical weed control measures in sorghum crops, the maximum conditional net income (44,403-44,457 rub./ha) and profitability level (141.2-140.6 %) at the lowest grain cost (4,974-4,988 rub./t) is achieved by applying both soil (Primextra Gold, 72 SC, 3.0 l/ha) and post-emergence (Balerina, SE, 0.4 l/ha or Dialen Super, aq. sol, 0.7 l/ha) herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1358 · show in text ↑
e2

“the crop yield increases by 4.28-4.30 t/ha (3.1 times)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1374–1428 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicides decreased the grain cost by 2.7 times.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
herbicidese1
Outcome
costs for grainse3
Direction
decreasee3
Value
2.7 timese3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CULTIVATION OF GRAIN SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“With a complex of mechanical weed control measures in sorghum crops, the maximum conditional net income (44,403-44,457 rub./ha) and profitability level (141.2-140.6 %) at the lowest grain cost (4,974-4,988 rub./t) is achieved by applying both soil (Primextra Gold, 72 SC, 3.0 l/ha) and post-emergence (Balerina, SE, 0.4 l/ha or Dialen Super, aq. sol, 0.7 l/ha) herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1358 · show in text ↑
e3

“the costs for grains decrease by 2.7 times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1475 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral fertilizers (N60P40) increased conditional net income by 3,860 rub./ha (12.0%) with shallow basic tillage.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
mineral fertilizers (N60P40)e0
Outcome
conditional net incomee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3,860 rub./ha (12.0 %)e0
Qualifier
shallow (12-14 cm) basic tillage (UDA-2.4-20M)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CULTIVATION OF GRAIN SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“The use of mineral fertilizers (N60P40) increased the conditional net income with shallow (12-14 cm) basic tillage (UDA-2.4-20M) by 3,860 rub./ha (12.0 %), and with deep (25-27 cm) plowing (PLN-3-35) – by 3,740 rub./ha (10.2%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1477–1703 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral fertilizers (N60P40) increased conditional net income by 3,740 rub./ha (10.2%) with deep plowing.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
mineral fertilizers (N60P40)e0
Outcome
conditional net incomee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3,740 rub./ha (10.2%)e0
Qualifier
deep (25-27 cm) plowing (PLN-3-35)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CULTIVATION OF GRAIN SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“The use of mineral fertilizers (N60P40) increased the conditional net income with shallow (12-14 cm) basic tillage (UDA-2.4-20M) by 3,860 rub./ha (12.0 %), and with deep (25-27 cm) plowing (PLN-3-35) – by 3,740 rub./ha (10.2%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1477–1703 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With N60P40, deep mouldboard plowing increased conditional net income by 11.3% compared with shallow tillage.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
deep mouldboard plowinge0
Outcome
conditional net incomee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
11.3 %e0
Comparator
shallow tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CULTIVATION OF GRAIN SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“With N60P40, deep mouldboard plowing compared to shallow tillage increased conditional net income by 11.3 %, profitability by 10.0 %,and reduced the cost of grain by 4.4 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1705–1876 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With N60P40, deep mouldboard plowing increased profitability by 10.0% compared with shallow tillage.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
deep mouldboard plowinge0
Outcome
profitabilitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10.0 %e0
Comparator
shallow tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CULTIVATION OF GRAIN SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“With N60P40, deep mouldboard plowing compared to shallow tillage increased conditional net income by 11.3 %, profitability by 10.0 %,and reduced the cost of grain by 4.4 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1705–1876 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With N60P40, deep mouldboard plowing reduced the cost of grain by 4.4% compared with shallow tillage.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
deep mouldboard plowinge0
Outcome
cost of graine0
Direction
reducede0
Value
4.4 %e0
Comparator
shallow tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CULTIVATION OF GRAIN SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“With N60P40, deep mouldboard plowing compared to shallow tillage increased conditional net income by 11.3 %, profitability by 10.0 %,and reduced the cost of grain by 4.4 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1705–1876 · show in text ↑

herbicide · yield · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results differ

37 papers: 27 positive, 10 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

fertilization · yield · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results differ

92 papers: 80 positive, 12 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

88 papers more in this group

See all 92 papers →

tillage · yield · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 29 positive, 19 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.