Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Effect of establishment methods and irrigation scheduling on growth indices of wet season rice

Nagender Gaddala; Govind Prasad Banjara; Mahender Kumar Rapolu; et al.

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Rice cultivation plays a crucial role in global food security but is increasingly challenged by labor shortages and water scarcity. Traditional methods such as puddled transplanted rice (TPR) are highly resource-intensive, necessitating the adoption of efficient establishment methods and optimized irrigation strategies. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different establishment methods and irrigation scheduling on key growth indices-crop growth rate (CGR), relative growth rate (RGR) and net assimilation rate (NAR) during the wet season. The experiment was conducted at the Indian Institute of Rice Research (IIRR), Hyderabad, using a strip plot design with four replications, comprising nine treatment combinations. Three rice establishment methods were assigned to horizontal strips: normal transplanting (NTP-M1), mechanized SRI (MSRI-M2), and direct-seeded rice in raised beds (DSR-M3). Three irrigation scheduling treatments were assigned to vertical strips: AWD with 10 cm depletion (I1), AWD with 5 cm depletion (I2), and continuous submergence (±5 cm) (I3). Results revealed that MSRI (M2) significantly improved CGR, RGR and NAR due to better seedling establishment, enhanced canopy expansion, and improved tillering efficiency. Among irrigation treatments, AWD with 5 cm depletion (I2) optimized water use without compromising growth, demonstrating its potential for sustainable water management. The findings highlight that mechanized transplanting (MSRI) combined with precision irrigation (AWD-5 cm) enhances water use efficiency, maintains growth indices and improves overall crop productivity. This study underscores the importance of integrating mechanized establishment methods with precise irrigation scheduling to enhance growth indices and ensure sustainable rice production in water-limited environments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

MSRI significantly improved crop growth rate, relative growth rate and net assimilation rate.

Treatment
MSRI (M2)e0
Outcome
CGR, RGR and NARe0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MSRI (M2) significantly improved CGR, RGR and NAR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1150 · show in text ↑
e1

“crop growth rate (CGR), relative growth rate (RGR) and net assimilation rate (NAR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 445–527 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AWD with 5 cm depletion optimized water use without compromising growth.

Treatment
AWD with 5 cm depletion (I2)e0
Outcome
water usee0
Direction
optimizede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AWD with 5 cm depletion (I2) optimized water use without compromising growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1356 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AWD with 5 cm depletion maintained growth.

Treatment
AWD with 5 cm depletion (I2)e0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
without compromisinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AWD with 5 cm depletion (I2) optimized water use without compromising growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1356 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining MSRI with AWD-5 cm enhanced water use efficiency.

Treatment
mechanized transplanting (MSRI) combined with precision irrigation (AWD-5 cm)e0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
enhancese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mechanized transplanting (MSRI) combined with precision irrigation (AWD-5 cm) enhances water use efficiency, maintains growth indices and improves overall crop productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1620 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining MSRI with AWD-5 cm maintained growth indices.

Treatment
mechanized transplanting (MSRI) combined with precision irrigation (AWD-5 cm)e0
Outcome
growth indicese0
Direction
maintainse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mechanized transplanting (MSRI) combined with precision irrigation (AWD-5 cm) enhances water use efficiency, maintains growth indices and improves overall crop productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1620 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining MSRI with AWD-5 cm improved overall crop productivity.

Treatment
mechanized transplanting (MSRI) combined with precision irrigation (AWD-5 cm)e0
Outcome
overall crop productivitye0
Direction
improvese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mechanized transplanting (MSRI) combined with precision irrigation (AWD-5 cm) enhances water use efficiency, maintains growth indices and improves overall crop productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1620 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–94 · show in text ↑

transplanting · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

75 papers: 66 positive, 9 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

transplanting · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

227 papers: 190 positive, 37 negative or no effect

189 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

223 papers more in this group

See all 227 papers →

irrigation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 222 positive, 69 negative or no effect

221 papers in the same direction as this paper · 62 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

287 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

380 papers: 350 positive, 30 negative or no effect

349 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

transplanting · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,078 papers: 922 positive, 156 negative or no effect

921 papers in the same direction as this paper · 132 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1,074 papers more in this group

See all 1,078 papers →

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 201 in the opposite direction · 64 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,167 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.