Paper · 2025 · Semina Ciências Agrárias

Fungicide systemicity and blast control in wheat heads

Daniela da Silva; Marcos Kovaleski; Cláudia Cristina Clebsch; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The chemical control of wheat blast, a disease caused by Pyricularia oryzae Triticum (PoT), is part of the integrated management of this disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate fungicide systemicity in wheat heads and its effect on blast control. BRS 264 cultivars were grown in pots until anthesis (Zadoks stage 65), after which two central spikelets were removed from each head, exposing the rachis, where fungicide solutions were applied. Seven fungicides were evaluated (Flutriafol, Tebuconazole, Propiconazole, Pydiflumetofen, Cyproconazole, Pyraclostrobin and Mancozeb), as well as the control treatment with no fungicides and only water applied. Twenty-four hours after the solution was applied, a conidial suspension (105 conidia mL-1) of PoT was sprayed on the heads and the plants were kept at 24 ºC, 90-95% relative humidity (RH) and in the dark for a further 24 hours. They were then kept at 24 ºC, 70-80% RH under a 12-hour photoperiod until disease severity on the heads was assessed 5, 7 and 11 days after inoculation (dai). Between 20 and 30 heads were evaluated per treatment. Severity above and below the treated area was assessed by the generalized beta regression model. Above the treated area, at 5 and 7 days, the treatments with Flutriafol, Tebuconazole, Propiconazole, Pydiflumetofen and Cyproconazole differed from Check, showing lower average blast severity. Mancozeb and Pyraclostrobin also showed lower disease severity compared to the Check treatment when the overall results were analyzed. The acropetal movement of fungicides should be considered along with other approaches to integrated wheat blast management.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flutriafol lowered wheat blast severity above the treated area at days 5 and 7.

Organ / stage
headst0
Treatment
Flutriafole0
Outcome
blast severitye0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
Above the treated area, at 5 and 7 dayse0
Comparator
Checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Above the treated area, at 5 and 7 days, the treatments with Flutriafol, Tebuconazole, Propiconazole, Pydiflumetofen and Cyproconazole differed from Check, showing lower average blast severity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1391 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat heads”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tebuconazole lowered wheat blast severity above the treated area at days 5 and 7.

Organ / stage
headst0
Treatment
Tebuconazolee0
Outcome
blast severitye0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
Above the treated area, at 5 and 7 dayse0
Comparator
Checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Above the treated area, at 5 and 7 days, the treatments with Flutriafol, Tebuconazole, Propiconazole, Pydiflumetofen and Cyproconazole differed from Check, showing lower average blast severity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1391 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat heads”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propiconazole lowered wheat blast severity above the treated area at days 5 and 7.

Organ / stage
headst0
Treatment
Propiconazolee0
Outcome
blast severitye0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
Above the treated area, at 5 and 7 dayse0
Comparator
Checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Above the treated area, at 5 and 7 days, the treatments with Flutriafol, Tebuconazole, Propiconazole, Pydiflumetofen and Cyproconazole differed from Check, showing lower average blast severity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1391 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat heads”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pydiflumetofen lowered wheat blast severity above the treated area at days 5 and 7.

Organ / stage
headst0
Treatment
Pydiflumetofene0
Outcome
blast severitye0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
Above the treated area, at 5 and 7 dayse0
Comparator
Checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Above the treated area, at 5 and 7 days, the treatments with Flutriafol, Tebuconazole, Propiconazole, Pydiflumetofen and Cyproconazole differed from Check, showing lower average blast severity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1391 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat heads”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cyproconazole lowered wheat blast severity above the treated area at days 5 and 7.

Organ / stage
headst0
Treatment
Cyproconazolee0
Outcome
blast severitye0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
Above the treated area, at 5 and 7 dayse0
Comparator
Checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Above the treated area, at 5 and 7 days, the treatments with Flutriafol, Tebuconazole, Propiconazole, Pydiflumetofen and Cyproconazole differed from Check, showing lower average blast severity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1391 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat heads”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mancozeb lowered overall wheat blast severity versus Check.

Treatment
Mancozebe0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
Check treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mancozeb and Pyraclostrobin also showed lower disease severity compared to the Check treatment when the overall results were analyzed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1526 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat heads”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyraclostrobin lowered overall wheat blast severity versus Check.

Treatment
Pyraclostrobine0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
Check treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mancozeb and Pyraclostrobin also showed lower disease severity compared to the Check treatment when the overall results were analyzed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1526 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat heads”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–54 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend considering acropetal fungicide movement in integrated wheat blast management.

Outcome
acropetal movement of fungicides should be considerede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The acropetal movement of fungicides should be considered along with other approaches to integrated wheat blast management.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1527–1650 · show in text ↑

flutriafol · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

mancozeb · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

cyproconazole · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

pyraclostrobin · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

propiconazole · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 25 positive, 2 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

tebuconazole · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

36 papers: 36 positive, 0 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.