Intervention effectmodel-written summary

There was no evidence that pyraclostrobin increased mycotoxin concentrations.

A claim from Effectiveness of a novel fungicide pydiflumetofen againstFusarium head blight and mycotoxin accumulation in winter wheat · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

There was no evidence that pyraclostrobin increased mycotoxin concentrations.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
pyraclostrobine0
Outcome
mycotoxin concentrationse0
Direction
no evidencee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no evidence that pyraclostrobin increased mycotoxin concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1534–1610
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–120

Title

Effectiveness of a novel fungicide pydiflumetofen againstFusarium head blight and mycotoxin accumulation in winter wheat

R. Xia; A.W. Schaafsma; V. Limay-Rios; et al. World Mycotoxin Journal 2021. doi:10.3920/wmj2020.2637

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-2bb73ff3d9bdef17e7cc5d04a918d5a541d201780f77f9581e17c461c8631b20 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

pyraclostrobin · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. no effect
See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.