Paper · 2025 · Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca

Assessing the impact of different water stresses on physio-chemical properties and yield-related traits in tomato genotypes: Insights into stability and response

Veerendra K. VERMA; Krishnappa RANGAPPA; Amit KUMAR; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Tomato is a highly sensitive crop to moisture stress, and grown widely under varying conditions of moisture deficit. To identify the stable genotypes and characterize their responses to moisture stress, thirty-two diverse genotypes were evaluated at three imposed moisture regimes i.e., sub-optimal irrigation at 75±5% of the field capacity (FC; L1), irrigation at 50±5% of the FC (L2), and irrigation at 25±5% of the FC (L3) inside a passively ventilated plastic greenhouse. A wide range of variability was observed for 23 analyzed physio-chemical traits under study. All the analysed traits (except root-shoot ratio, chlorophyll index, total biomass, sugar content, and acidity) have shown higher heritability and moderate to high genetic advance, indicating that these traits are governed by additive gene action and responsive to selection under water stress conditions. All the growth and yield parameters were shown to decrease significantly with the increase of intensity of moistures stress. Likewise, physiological parameters, namely chlorophyll and the relative water content tended to decrease, while the rate of water loss and proline content tended to increase following an increase in stress level. Fruit quality traits like total sugar, vitamin-C, and lycopene contents were tended to improve with the increase of designated moisture stress. The additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) analysis of variance revealed the significant effects of moisture stress, genotype, and genotype × environment interaction for yield and yield-related traits. Based on multi-trait stability index (MTSI) analysis, MT-11, VL Tomato-4 and Megha Tomato-3 were considered most stable and promising genotypes for promotion for commercial production under the moisture stress conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Physio-chemical traits of tomato genotypes showed a wide range of variability.

Outcome
wide range of variabilitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“A wide range of variability was observed for 23 analyzed physio-chemical traits under study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–567 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most analysed tomato traits showed higher heritability and moderate to high genetic advance.

Outcome
heritability and moderate to high genetic advancee2
Direction
highere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–123 · show in text ↑
e2

“All the analysed traits (except root-shoot ratio, chlorophyll index, total biomass, sugar content, and acidity) have shown higher heritability and moderate to high genetic advance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–748 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The tomato traits are governed by additive gene action and respond to selection under water stress.

Outcome
responsive to selectione3
Qualifier
additive gene actione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–123 · show in text ↑
e3

“indicating that these traits are governed by additive gene action and responsive to selection under water stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–873 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth and yield parameters of tomato decreased significantly as moisture stress intensity increased.

Treatment
increase of intensity of moistures stresse4
Outcome
growth and yield parameterse4
Direction
decreasee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–123 · show in text ↑
e4

“All the growth and yield parameters were shown to decrease significantly with the increase of intensity of moistures stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–998 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll and relative water content of tomato tended to decrease as stress level increased.

Treatment
increase in stress levele5
Outcome
chlorophyll and the relative water contente5
Direction
decreasee5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–123 · show in text ↑
e5

“physiological parameters, namely chlorophyll and the relative water content tended to decrease, while the rate of water loss and proline content tended to increase following an increase in stress level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1211 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rate of water loss and proline content of tomato tended to increase as stress level increased.

Treatment
increase in stress levele5
Outcome
rate of water loss and proline contente5
Direction
increasee5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–123 · show in text ↑
e5

“physiological parameters, namely chlorophyll and the relative water content tended to decrease, while the rate of water loss and proline content tended to increase following an increase in stress level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1211 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit quality traits of tomato tended to improve as designated moisture stress increased.

Treatment
increase of designated moisture stresse6
Outcome
total sugar, vitamin-C, and lycopene contentse6
Direction
improvee6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–123 · show in text ↑
e6

“Fruit quality traits like total sugar, vitamin-C, and lycopene contents were tended to improve with the increase of designated moisture stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1355 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMMI analysis showed significant effects of moisture stress, genotype and their interaction on yield and yield-related traits.

Treatment
moisture stresse7
Outcome
yield and yield-related traitse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–123 · show in text ↑
e7

“The additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) analysis of variance revealed the significant effects of moisture stress, genotype, and genotype × environment interaction for yield and yield-related traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1357–1578 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MT-11, VL Tomato-4 and Megha Tomato-3 were the most stable and promising tomato genotypes under moisture stress.

Material
MT-11, VL Tomato-4 and Megha Tomato-3e7
Treatment
moisture stress conditionse7
Outcome
most stable and promising genotypese7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–123 · show in text ↑
e7

“Based on multi-trait stability index (MTSI) analysis, MT-11, VL Tomato-4 and Megha Tomato-3 were considered most stable and promising genotypes for promotion for commercial production under the moisture stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1580–1800 · show in text ↑

drought · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

24 papers: 18 positive, 6 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.