Paper · 2025 · Agricultural Water Management

Effects of delayed nitrogen fertilizer drip timing on soil total salt, cotton yield and nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency

Junxiao Zhang; Xiangwen Xie; Changxue Wu; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Soil salinization in arid regions severely limits cotton growth by restricting nitrogen availability. Optimizing nitrogen application timing in conjunction with effective salt leaching is a potential strategy to enhance nitrogen uptake and improve yield. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of nitrogen drip timing on soil salt leaching, available nitrogen distribution in the soil profile, and cotton yield. We conducted an indoor 15 N labeled fertilizer leaching experiment and a two-year field experiment to adjust the nitrogen dripping time while applying the same amount of pure nitrogen. Specifically, “t” was defined as the total duration of one irrigation cycle, and the starting points for nitrogen application were as follows: T1, 1 h; T2, 1 h + 1/3 t h; T3, 1 h + 2/3 t h; CK, 1/3 t h and CK0 (no fertilization treatment). The results of indoor experiments revealed that the 15 N abundance of the T3 treatment was the highest in the 0–20 cm soil layer, which was 57.50 % and 46.51 % higher than that of the T1 and T2 treatments. The results of field experiment show that T3 treatment significantly reduced the total soil salt, which was 25.49 % lower than that of T1 treatment at the bud stage. At the bud stages, the NO 3 - content of T3 treatment was 1.82 times higher than that of T1 treatment. In the boll opening stage, T3 treatment achieved the highest ammonium nitrogen content, which was 23.43 % higher than that of T1 treatment. At the flowering-boll stage, the nitrogen accumulation of T3 treatment was 30.17 % higher than that of CK treatment. The cotton yield was 11.63 % higher of T3 treatment compared to CK treatment. From the perspective of soil salinity, nitrogen distribution, nitrogen accumulation, and cotton yield, T3 treatment effectively removed salt and increased cotton yield. • Delaying fertilization reduced the total salt content of soil and increased the yield. • The later the time node of fertilization, the better the effect of salt displacement and nitrogen increase. • Delayed nitrogen dripping time could not improve the the nitrogen use efficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 had the highest soil 15 N abundance, 57.50% higher than T1 in the 0–20 cm layer.

Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
15 N abundancee0
Direction
highere0
Value
57.50 %e0
Qualifier
0–20 cm soil layere0
Comparator
T1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“15 N abundance of the T3 treatment was the highest in the 0–20 cm soil layer, which was 57.50 % and 46.51 % higher than that of the T1 and T2 treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1054 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effects of delayed nitrogen fertilizer drip timing on soil total salt, cotton yield and nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 had 46.51% higher soil 15 N abundance than T2.

Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
15 N abundancee0
Direction
highere0
Value
46.51 %e0
Comparator
T2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“15 N abundance of the T3 treatment was the highest in the 0–20 cm soil layer, which was 57.50 % and 46.51 % higher than that of the T1 and T2 treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1054 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effects of delayed nitrogen fertilizer drip timing on soil total salt, cotton yield and nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 reduced total soil salt by 25.49% relative to T1 at bud stage.

Organ / stage
bud stagee0
Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
total soil salte0
Direction
lowere0
Value
25.49 %e0
Comparator
T1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T3 treatment significantly reduced the total soil salt, which was 25.49 % lower than that of T1 treatment at the bud stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1220 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effects of delayed nitrogen fertilizer drip timing on soil total salt, cotton yield and nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 soil nitrate content was 1.82 times T1 at bud stage.

Organ / stage
bud stagese0
Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
NO 3 - contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.82 timese0
Comparator
T1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the bud stages, the NO 3 - content of T3 treatment was 1.82 times higher than that of T1 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1323 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effects of delayed nitrogen fertilizer drip timing on soil total salt, cotton yield and nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 ammonium nitrogen content was 23.43% higher than T1 at boll opening.

Organ / stage
boll opening stagee0
Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
ammonium nitrogen contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
23.43 %e0
Comparator
T1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the boll opening stage, T3 treatment achieved the highest ammonium nitrogen content, which was 23.43 % higher than that of T1 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1463 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effects of delayed nitrogen fertilizer drip timing on soil total salt, cotton yield and nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 nitrogen accumulation was 30.17% higher than CK at flowering-boll stage.

Organ / stage
flowering-boll stagee0
Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
nitrogen accumulatione0
Direction
highere0
Value
30.17 %e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the flowering-boll stage, the nitrogen accumulation of T3 treatment was 30.17 % higher than that of CK treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1465–1580 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effects of delayed nitrogen fertilizer drip timing on soil total salt, cotton yield and nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 cotton yield was 11.63% higher than CK.

Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
cotton yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
11.63 %e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cotton yield was 11.63 % higher of T3 treatment compared to CK treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1658 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed nitrogen dripping did not improve nitrogen use efficiency.

Treatment
Delayed nitrogen dripping timee0
Outcome
nitrogen use efficiencye0
Direction
could not improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delayed nitrogen dripping time could not improve the the nitrogen use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2030–2110 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effects of delayed nitrogen fertilizer drip timing on soil total salt, cotton yield and nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–122 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 27 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.