Abstract
Guava is the fourth important commercial fruit crop grown throughout India used mainly for fresh and processing purpose.Among the various factors which affect the production and productivity of guava, nutrient management assumes much more significance.The experiment entitled "Studies on integrated nutrient management module (INM) on physico-chemical parameters of guava cv.Lucknow-49 was conducted at Main Horticultural Research and Extension center (MHREC), University of Horticultural Sciences, Bagalkot.The experiment was laid out in RCBD design with 8 treatments replicated thrice.Among these treatments T 7 50 % RDF (150:60:75 g NPK/plant ) + 25 % through neem cake (1.5 kg/plant) + 25 % through vermicompost (2.5 kg/plant) + VAM (50 g/plant) + PSB (20 g/plant) + KSB (20 g/plant) + Azotobacter (20 g/plant) + micronutrients spray (Zinc sulphate @ 0.5 % + Boron @ 0.2 % + Manganese @ 0.1 %) was recorded maximum plant height (3.13, 3.37, 3.50 and 3.61 m), canopy volume (2.80, 3.22, 3.53 and 3.94 m 3 ), leaf area (37.26, 40.23, 43.26 and 48.27 cm 2 ), specific leaf area (57.32, 60.95, 64.57and 69.96 cm 2 /g) and chlorophyll content (19.36, 22.65, 26.25 and 29.47 SPAD).The same treatment was also favours the quality parameters such as maximum TSS (13.74 0 B), minimum acidity (0.44 %), TSS: acid (31.23), ascorbic acid (277.27mg/100g), pH (4.70), pectin (0.85 %), fruit firmness (49.44 N) and shelf life (7.25 days).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated nutrient module T7 gave the maximum plant height of guava (3.13, 3.37, 3.50 and 3.61 m).
- Taxon
- Guava
Psidium guajavat0 - Material
- Lucknow-49t0
- Treatment
- 50 % RDF (150:60:75 g NPK/plant ) + 25 % through neem cake (1.5 kg/plant) + 25 % through vermicompost (2.5 kg/plant)e3
- Outcome
- plant heighte2
- Direction
- maximume1
- Value
- 3.13, 3.37, 3.50 and 3.61 me2
- Setting
- Bagalkote0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“GUAVA CV. LUCKNOW-49”
e0“University of Horticultural Sciences, Bagalkot”
e1“was recorded maximum”
e2“maximum plant height (3.13, 3.37, 3.50 and 3.61 m)”
e3“T 7 50 % RDF (150:60:75 g NPK/plant ) + 25 % through neem cake (1.5 kg/plant) + 25 % through vermicompost (2.5 kg/plant)”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated nutrient module T7 gave the maximum canopy volume of guava (2.80, 3.22, 3.53 and 3.94 m3).
- Taxon
- GuavaPsidium guajavat0
- Material
- Lucknow-49t0
- Treatment
- 50 % RDF (150:60:75 g NPK/plant ) + 25 % through neem cake (1.5 kg/plant) + 25 % through vermicompost (2.5 kg/plant)e3
- Outcome
- canopy volumee2
- Direction
- maximume1
- Value
- 2.80, 3.22, 3.53 and 3.94 m 3e2
- Setting
- Bagalkote0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“GUAVA CV. LUCKNOW-49”
e0“University of Horticultural Sciences, Bagalkot”
e1“was recorded maximum”
e2“canopy volume (2.80, 3.22, 3.53 and 3.94 m 3 )”
e3“T 7 50 % RDF (150:60:75 g NPK/plant ) + 25 % through neem cake (1.5 kg/plant) + 25 % through vermicompost (2.5 kg/plant)”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated nutrient module T7 gave the maximum leaf area of guava (37.26, 40.23, 43.26 and 48.27 cm2).
- Taxon
- GuavaPsidium guajavat0
- Material
- Lucknow-49t0
- Treatment
- 50 % RDF (150:60:75 g NPK/plant ) + 25 % through neem cake (1.5 kg/plant) + 25 % through vermicompost (2.5 kg/plant)e3
- Outcome
- leaf areae2
- Direction
- maximume1
- Value
- 37.26, 40.23, 43.26 and 48.27 cm 2e2
- Setting
- Bagalkote0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“GUAVA CV. LUCKNOW-49”
e0“University of Horticultural Sciences, Bagalkot”
e1“was recorded maximum”
e2“leaf area (37.26, 40.23, 43.26 and 48.27 cm 2 )”
e3“T 7 50 % RDF (150:60:75 g NPK/plant ) + 25 % through neem cake (1.5 kg/plant) + 25 % through vermicompost (2.5 kg/plant)”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated nutrient module T7 gave the maximum specific leaf area of guava (57.32, 60.95, 64.57 and 69.96 cm2/g).
- Taxon
- GuavaPsidium guajavat0
- Material
- Lucknow-49t0
- Treatment
- 50 % RDF (150:60:75 g NPK/plant ) + 25 % through neem cake (1.5 kg/plant) + 25 % through vermicompost (2.5 kg/plant)e3
- Outcome
- specific leaf areae2
- Direction
- maximume1
- Value
- 57.32, 60.95, 64.57and 69.96 cm 2 /ge2
- Setting
- Bagalkote0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“GUAVA CV. LUCKNOW-49”
e0“University of Horticultural Sciences, Bagalkot”
e1“was recorded maximum”
e2“specific leaf area (57.32, 60.95, 64.57and 69.96 cm 2 /g)”
e3“T 7 50 % RDF (150:60:75 g NPK/plant ) + 25 % through neem cake (1.5 kg/plant) + 25 % through vermicompost (2.5 kg/plant)”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated nutrient module T7 gave the maximum chlorophyll content of guava (19.36, 22.65, 26.25 and 29.47 SPAD).
- Taxon
- GuavaPsidium guajavat0
- Material
- Lucknow-49t0
- Treatment
- 50 % RDF (150:60:75 g NPK/plant ) + 25 % through neem cake (1.5 kg/plant) + 25 % through vermicompost (2.5 kg/plant)e3
- Outcome
- chlorophyll contente2
- Direction
- maximume1
- Value
- 19.36, 22.65, 26.25 and 29.47 SPADe2
- Setting
- Bagalkote0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“GUAVA CV. LUCKNOW-49”
e0“University of Horticultural Sciences, Bagalkot”
e1“was recorded maximum”
e2“chlorophyll content (19.36, 22.65, 26.25 and 29.47 SPAD)”
e3“T 7 50 % RDF (150:60:75 g NPK/plant ) + 25 % through neem cake (1.5 kg/plant) + 25 % through vermicompost (2.5 kg/plant)”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated nutrient module T7 gave the maximum TSS of guava fruit (13.74 0 B).
- Taxon
- GuavaPsidium guajavat0
- Material
- Lucknow-49t0
- Treatment
- 50 % RDF (150:60:75 g NPK/plant ) + 25 % through neem cake (1.5 kg/plant) + 25 % through vermicompost (2.5 kg/plant)e3
- Outcome
- TSSe2
- Direction
- maximume2
- Value
- 13.74 0 Be2
- Setting
- Bagalkote0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“GUAVA CV. LUCKNOW-49”
e0“University of Horticultural Sciences, Bagalkot”
e2“maximum TSS (13.74 0 B)”
e3“T 7 50 % RDF (150:60:75 g NPK/plant ) + 25 % through neem cake (1.5 kg/plant) + 25 % through vermicompost (2.5 kg/plant)”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated nutrient module T7 gave the minimum acidity of guava fruit (0.44 %).
- Taxon
- GuavaPsidium guajavat0
- Material
- Lucknow-49t0
- Treatment
- 50 % RDF (150:60:75 g NPK/plant ) + 25 % through neem cake (1.5 kg/plant) + 25 % through vermicompost (2.5 kg/plant)e3
- Outcome
- aciditye2
- Direction
- minimume2
- Value
- 0.44 %e2
- Setting
- Bagalkote0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“GUAVA CV. LUCKNOW-49”
e0“University of Horticultural Sciences, Bagalkot”
e2“minimum acidity (0.44 %)”
e3“T 7 50 % RDF (150:60:75 g NPK/plant ) + 25 % through neem cake (1.5 kg/plant) + 25 % through vermicompost (2.5 kg/plant)”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated nutrient module T7 favoured the TSS:acid ratio of guava fruit (31.23).
- Taxon
- GuavaPsidium guajavat0
- Material
- Lucknow-49t0
- Treatment
- 50 % RDF (150:60:75 g NPK/plant ) + 25 % through neem cake (1.5 kg/plant) + 25 % through vermicompost (2.5 kg/plant)e3
- Outcome
- TSS: acide2
- Direction
- favourse1
- Value
- 31.23e2
- Setting
- Bagalkote0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“GUAVA CV. LUCKNOW-49”
e0“University of Horticultural Sciences, Bagalkot”
e1“The same treatment was also favours the quality parameters”
e2“TSS: acid (31.23)”
e3“T 7 50 % RDF (150:60:75 g NPK/plant ) + 25 % through neem cake (1.5 kg/plant) + 25 % through vermicompost (2.5 kg/plant)”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated nutrient module T7 favoured the ascorbic acid content of guava fruit (277.27 mg/100 g).
- Taxon
- GuavaPsidium guajavat0
- Material
- Lucknow-49t0
- Treatment
- 50 % RDF (150:60:75 g NPK/plant ) + 25 % through neem cake (1.5 kg/plant) + 25 % through vermicompost (2.5 kg/plant)e3
- Outcome
- ascorbic acide2
- Direction
- favourse1
- Value
- 277.27mg/100ge2
- Setting
- Bagalkote0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“GUAVA CV. LUCKNOW-49”
e0“University of Horticultural Sciences, Bagalkot”
e1“The same treatment was also favours the quality parameters”
e2“ascorbic acid (277.27mg/100g)”
e3“T 7 50 % RDF (150:60:75 g NPK/plant ) + 25 % through neem cake (1.5 kg/plant) + 25 % through vermicompost (2.5 kg/plant)”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated nutrient module T7 favoured the pH of guava fruit (4.70).
- Taxon
- GuavaPsidium guajavat0
- Material
- Lucknow-49t0
- Treatment
- 50 % RDF (150:60:75 g NPK/plant ) + 25 % through neem cake (1.5 kg/plant) + 25 % through vermicompost (2.5 kg/plant)e3
- Outcome
- pHe2
- Direction
- favourse1
- Value
- 4.70e2
- Setting
- Bagalkote0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“GUAVA CV. LUCKNOW-49”
e0“University of Horticultural Sciences, Bagalkot”
e1“The same treatment was also favours the quality parameters”
e2“pH (4.70)”
e3“T 7 50 % RDF (150:60:75 g NPK/plant ) + 25 % through neem cake (1.5 kg/plant) + 25 % through vermicompost (2.5 kg/plant)”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated nutrient module T7 favoured the pectin content of guava fruit (0.85 %).
- Taxon
- GuavaPsidium guajavat0
- Material
- Lucknow-49t0
- Treatment
- 50 % RDF (150:60:75 g NPK/plant ) + 25 % through neem cake (1.5 kg/plant) + 25 % through vermicompost (2.5 kg/plant)e3
- Outcome
- pectine2
- Direction
- favourse1
- Value
- 0.85 %e2
- Setting
- Bagalkote0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“GUAVA CV. LUCKNOW-49”
e0“University of Horticultural Sciences, Bagalkot”
e1“The same treatment was also favours the quality parameters”
e2“pectin (0.85 %)”
e3“T 7 50 % RDF (150:60:75 g NPK/plant ) + 25 % through neem cake (1.5 kg/plant) + 25 % through vermicompost (2.5 kg/plant)”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated nutrient module T7 favoured the fruit firmness of guava (49.44 N).
- Taxon
- GuavaPsidium guajavat0
- Material
- Lucknow-49t0
- Treatment
- 50 % RDF (150:60:75 g NPK/plant ) + 25 % through neem cake (1.5 kg/plant) + 25 % through vermicompost (2.5 kg/plant)e3
- Outcome
- fruit firmnesse2
- Direction
- favourse1
- Value
- 49.44 Ne2
- Setting
- Bagalkote0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“GUAVA CV. LUCKNOW-49”
e0“University of Horticultural Sciences, Bagalkot”
e1“The same treatment was also favours the quality parameters”
e2“fruit firmness (49.44 N)”
e3“T 7 50 % RDF (150:60:75 g NPK/plant ) + 25 % through neem cake (1.5 kg/plant) + 25 % through vermicompost (2.5 kg/plant)”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated nutrient module T7 favoured the shelf life of guava fruit (7.25 days).
- Taxon
- GuavaPsidium guajavat0
- Material
- Lucknow-49t0
- Treatment
- 50 % RDF (150:60:75 g NPK/plant ) + 25 % through neem cake (1.5 kg/plant) + 25 % through vermicompost (2.5 kg/plant)e3
- Outcome
- shelf lifee2
- Direction
- favourse1
- Value
- 7.25 dayse2
- Setting
- Bagalkote0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“GUAVA CV. LUCKNOW-49”
e0“University of Horticultural Sciences, Bagalkot”
e1“The same treatment was also favours the quality parameters”
e2“shelf life (7.25 days)”
e3“T 7 50 % RDF (150:60:75 g NPK/plant ) + 25 % through neem cake (1.5 kg/plant) + 25 % through vermicompost (2.5 kg/plant)”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · soil: chemistry · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →botanical · growth · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results
42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
40 papers more in this group
See all 44 papers →fertilization · growth · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results
55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
55 papers more in this group
See all 59 papers →botanical · soil: chemistry · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
botanical · molecular: metabolites · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
8 of 14 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.