Paper · 2025 · Plant Science Today

Evaluation of egg-based fermented liquid formulation for improving organic rice yield

Thanakkan Ramesh; Selvaraj Rathika; Nandhini Dhandayuthapani Udhaya

19
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The productivity of organic farming relies on locally available or prepared organic inputs. One such locally organic formulation, fermented egg extract (FEE), requires scientific evaluation of its physicochemical and biological properties, as well as optimisation of its foliar spray concentration for enhanced rice growth and productivity. Preparation of FEE was carried out by immersing 10 eggs in lemon juice (extracted from 20-25 lemons) for 10 days. Then, eggs were crushed well and 250 g of jaggery was supplemented and set aside for another 10 days. The filtered liquid formulation was taken for laboratory analysis. The results on physicochemical and biological properties showed that the pH was acidic (4.8) and EC was 9.85 dSm-1. It contains a considerable amount of plant nutrients such as N (0.93%), P (0.13%), K (0.15%), Ca (292 ppm), Mg (112 ppm), S (7.93 ppm), Cu (0.3 ppm), Zn (7.9 ppm), Mn (0.17 ppm) and Fe (8.4 ppm). Microbial populations namely total fungi, bacteria and actinobacteria found in FEE were 15 × 104, 197 × 106 and 3.23 × 102 (CFU ml-1), respectively. A field study was carried out for 2 consecutive years to evaluate the impact of foliar spray of different FEE concentrations at panicle initiation and flowering stages of rice. The findings indicate that foliar spray of 2.0% FEE twice significantly improved growth, yield attributes, grain productivity (4897 kg/ha) and benefit-cost ratio (2.27) compared to untreated control. Thus, 2.0% fermented egg extract foliar application is identified as a potential nutrient formulation to enhance the productivity of organic rice.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fermented egg extract was acidic, with a pH of 4.8.

Outcome
pHe0
Value
4.8e0

Verbatim

e0

“the pH was acidic (4.8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–716 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fermented egg extract had an EC of 9.85 dSm-1.

Outcome
ECe0
Value
9.85 dSm-1e0

Verbatim

e0

“EC was 9.85 dSm-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–738 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fermented egg extract contained 0.93% N.

Outcome
Ne0
Value
0.93%e0

Verbatim

e0

“N (0.93%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–810 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fermented egg extract contained 0.13% P.

Outcome
Pe0
Value
0.13%e0

Verbatim

e0

“P (0.13%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–821 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fermented egg extract contained 0.15% K.

Outcome
Ke0
Value
0.15%e0

Verbatim

e0

“K (0.15%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–832 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fermented egg extract contained 292 ppm Ca.

Outcome
Cae0
Value
292 ppme0

Verbatim

e0

“Ca (292 ppm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–846 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fermented egg extract contained 112 ppm Mg.

Outcome
Mge0
Value
112 ppme0

Verbatim

e0

“Mg (112 ppm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–860 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fermented egg extract contained 7.93 ppm S.

Outcome
Se0
Value
7.93 ppme0

Verbatim

e0

“S (7.93 ppm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–874 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fermented egg extract contained 0.3 ppm Cu.

Outcome
Cue0
Value
0.3 ppme0

Verbatim

e0

“Cu (0.3 ppm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–888 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fermented egg extract contained 7.9 ppm Zn.

Outcome
Zne0
Value
7.9 ppme0

Verbatim

e0

“Zn (7.9 ppm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–902 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fermented egg extract contained 0.17 ppm Mn.

Outcome
Mne0
Value
0.17 ppme0

Verbatim

e0

“Mn (0.17 ppm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–917 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fermented egg extract contained 8.4 ppm Fe.

Outcome
Fee0
Value
8.4 ppme0

Verbatim

e0

“Fe (8.4 ppm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–934 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total fungi in the fermented egg extract numbered 15 x 10^4 CFU per ml.

Outcome
total fungie0
Value
15 × 104e0
Qualifier
CFU ml-1e0

Verbatim

e0

“total fungi, bacteria and actinobacteria found in FEE were 15 × 104, 197 × 106 and 3.23 × 102 (CFU ml-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1069 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacteria in the fermented egg extract numbered 197 x 10^6 CFU per ml.

Outcome
bacteriae0
Value
197 × 106e0
Qualifier
CFU ml-1e0

Verbatim

e0

“total fungi, bacteria and actinobacteria found in FEE were 15 × 104, 197 × 106 and 3.23 × 102 (CFU ml-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1069 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Actinobacteria in the fermented egg extract numbered 3.23 x 10^2 CFU per ml.

Outcome
actinobacteriae0
Value
3.23 × 102e0
Qualifier
CFU ml-1e0

Verbatim

e0

“total fungi, bacteria and actinobacteria found in FEE were 15 × 104, 197 × 106 and 3.23 × 102 (CFU ml-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1069 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spray of 2.0% FEE applied twice significantly improved rice growth and yield attributes compared with the untreated control.

Treatment
foliar spray of 2.0% FEE twicee0
Outcome
growth, yield attributese0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar spray of 2.0% FEE twice significantly improved growth, yield attributes, grain productivity (4897 kg/ha) and benefit-cost ratio (2.27) compared to untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1460 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spray of 2.0% FEE applied twice significantly increased rice grain productivity to 4897 kg/ha compared with the untreated control.

Treatment
foliar spray of 2.0% FEE twicee0
Outcome
grain productivitye0
Direction
improvede0
Value
4897 kg/hae0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar spray of 2.0% FEE twice significantly improved growth, yield attributes, grain productivity (4897 kg/ha) and benefit-cost ratio (2.27) compared to untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1460 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spray of 2.0% FEE applied twice significantly improved the benefit-cost ratio of rice to 2.27 compared with the untreated control.

Treatment
foliar spray of 2.0% FEE twicee0
Outcome
benefit-cost ratioe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
2.27e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar spray of 2.0% FEE twice significantly improved growth, yield attributes, grain productivity (4897 kg/ha) and benefit-cost ratio (2.27) compared to untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1460 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–79 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identify 2.0% fermented egg extract foliar application as a potential nutrient formulation to enhance the productivity of organic rice.

Treatment
2.0% fermented egg extract foliar applicatione0
Outcome
productivity of organic ricee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“2.0% fermented egg extract foliar application is identified as a potential nutrient formulation to enhance the productivity of organic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1468–1607 · show in text ↑

botanical · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

208 papers: 193 positive, 15 negative or no effect

192 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

204 papers more in this group

See all 208 papers →

processing · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

114 papers: 88 positive, 26 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

110 papers more in this group

See all 114 papers →

application · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

691 papers: 645 positive, 46 negative or no effect

644 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

687 papers more in this group

See all 691 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.