Abstract
A field experiment was carried out during the 2020–2021 growing season to examine how the sweet potato responded to various doses of organic and inorganic fertilizer. The treatment included three levels of farmyard waste and four levels of nitrogen fertilizers (0, 40, 70, and 100 kg N ha-1) (0, 5and 10 FYM t ha-1). The experiment was performed three times and set up using a Randomized Complete Block Design in a factorial layout. Software called SAS (version 9.3) was used to examine the data. The findings showed that the majority of the growth, yield, and yield components were significantly (P 0.01) impacted by the application of N and farmyard manure fertilizers. The highest and lowest vine lengths measured were 160.23 and 112.17 cm, respectively. Other measurements included shoot fresh weight (1009.6 and 109.8 g hill-1), shoot dry weight (141.35 and 61.6 g hill-1), days of bud sprouting (13.27 and 6.34), days of physiological maturity (147.8 and 119), number of branches per plant (7.30 and 4.28), harvest index (0.36 and 0.28%), biomass yield (1009.2 and 579.7), tuberous storage tuber diameter (22.5 and 15.6 cm), total tuber yield (22.45 and 7.05 tha-1), marketable tuber yield (21.85 and 7.65 tha-1), unmarketable tuber yield (3.25 and 0.31 t/ha), marketable storage tuber number (3.2 and 0.83), and un marketable tuber number (0.38 and 0.02) were obtained from 10t ha-1farmyard manure plus 100 kgha-1 N fertilizer. However, the above-mentioned factors were countered by the number of branches per plant, the quantity of unmarketable tubers, and the yield of unmarketable tubers. In conclusion, the findings showed that the application of inorganic nitrogen fertilizer along with farmyard manure might improve the growth, production, and yield components of sweet potatoes. To get more trustworthy data, though, additional research must be done in various environments and at various times of the year while taking fertilizer rates for nitrogen and FYM into account.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 18
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen and farmyard manure fertilizer application significantly impacted growth, yield and yield components.
- Taxon
- Sweet Potato
_Flower.jpg?width=60)
Ipomoea batatast0 - Treatment
- application of N and farmyard manure fertilizerse1
- Outcome
- growth, yield, and yield componentse1
- Setting
- fielde0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Flower.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Response of Sweet Potato”
e0“A field experiment was carried out during the 2020–2021 growing season to examine how the sweet potato responded to various doses of organic and inorganic fertilizer”
e1“The findings showed that the majority of the growth, yield, and yield components were significantly (P 0.01) impacted by the application of N and farmyard manure fertilizers”
Claim · model-written summary
Vine lengths were 160.23 cm at the highest and 112.17 cm at the lowest level.
- Taxon
- Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
- Outcome
- vine lengthse2
- Value
- 160.23 and 112.17 cme2
- Qualifier
- highest and loweste2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Response of Sweet Potato”
e2“The highest and lowest vine lengths measured were 160.23 and 112.17 cm, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Shoot fresh weight was 1009.6 and 109.8 g per hill at the highest and lowest levels.
- Taxon
- Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
- Outcome
- shoot fresh weighte3
- Value
- 1009.6 and 109.8 ge3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Response of Sweet Potato”
e3“Other measurements included shoot fresh weight (1009.6 and 109.8 g hill”
Claim · model-written summary
Shoot dry weight was 141.35 and 61.6 g per hill at the highest and lowest levels.
- Taxon
- Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
- Outcome
- shoot dry weighte4
- Value
- 141.35 and 61.6 ge4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Response of Sweet Potato”
e4“shoot dry weight (141.35 and 61.6 g hill”
Claim · model-written summary
Days of bud sprouting were 13.27 and 6.34 at the highest and lowest levels.
- Taxon
- Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
- Outcome
- days of bud sproutinge5
- Value
- 13.27 and 6.34e5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Response of Sweet Potato”
e5“days of bud sprouting (13.27 and 6.34)”
Claim · model-written summary
Days of physiological maturity were 147.8 and 119 at the highest and lowest levels.
- Taxon
- Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
- Outcome
- days of physiological maturitye6
- Value
- 147.8 and 119e6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Response of Sweet Potato”
e6“days of physiological maturity (147.8 and 119)”
Claim · model-written summary
Number of branches per plant was 7.30 and 4.28 at the highest and lowest levels.
- Taxon
- Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
- Outcome
- number of branches per plante7
- Value
- 7.30 and 4.28e7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Response of Sweet Potato”
e7“number of branches per plant (7.30 and 4.28)”
Claim · model-written summary
Harvest index was 0.36 and 0.28% at the highest and lowest levels.
- Taxon
- Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
- Outcome
- harvest indexe1
- Value
- 0.36 and 0.28%e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Response of Sweet Potato”
e1“harvest index (0.36 and 0.28%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Biomass yield was 1009.2 and 579.7 at the highest and lowest levels.
- Taxon
- Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
- Outcome
- biomass yielde1
- Value
- 1009.2 and 579.7e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Response of Sweet Potato”
e1“biomass yield (1009.2 and 579.7)”
Claim · model-written summary
Storage tuber diameter was 22.5 and 15.6 cm at the highest and lowest levels.
- Taxon
- Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
- Outcome
- storage tuber diametere1
- Value
- 22.5 and 15.6 cme1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Response of Sweet Potato”
e1“tuberous storage tuber diameter (22.5 and 15.6 cm)”
Claim · model-written summary
Total tuber yield was 22.45 at the highest level and 7.05 t/ha at the lowest.
- Taxon
- Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
- Outcome
- total tuber yielde1
- Value
- 22.45e1
- Qualifier
- 7.05 thae2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Response of Sweet Potato”
e1“total tuber yield (22.45”
e2“and 7.05 tha”
Claim · model-written summary
Marketable tuber yield was 21.85 and 7.65 t/ha at the highest and lowest levels.
- Taxon
- Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
- Outcome
- marketable tuber yielde1
- Value
- 21.85 and 7.65e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Response of Sweet Potato”
e1“marketable tuber yield (21.85 and 7.65”
Claim · model-written summary
Unmarketable tuber yield was 3.25 at the highest level and 0.31 t/ha at the lowest.
- Taxon
- Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
- Outcome
- unmarketable tuber yielde1
- Value
- 3.25e1
- Qualifier
- 0.31e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Response of Sweet Potato”
e1“unmarketable tuber yield (3.25”
e2“and 0.31”
Claim · model-written summary
Marketable storage tuber number was 3.2 and 0.83 at the highest and lowest levels.
- Taxon
- Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
- Outcome
- marketable storage tuber numbere1
- Value
- 3.2 and 0.83e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Response of Sweet Potato”
e1“marketable storage tuber number (3.2 and 0.83)”
Claim · model-written summary
Unmarketable tuber number was 0.38 at the highest level and 0.02 at the lowest.
- Taxon
- Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
- Outcome
- un marketable tuber numbere1
- Value
- 0.38e1
- Qualifier
- 0.02e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Response of Sweet Potato”
e1“un marketable tuber number (0.38”
e2“and 0.02)”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest values were obtained from 10 t/ha farmyard manure plus 100 kg N/ha.
- Taxon
- Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
- Treatment
- 10t hae1
- Outcome
- were obtainede1
- Qualifier
- 100 kghae2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Response of Sweet Potato”
e1“were obtained from 10t ha”
e2“plus 100 kgha”
Claim · model-written summary
Number of branches per plant was countered by the above-mentioned factors.
- Taxon
- Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
- Outcome
- number of branches per plante1
- Qualifier
- the above-mentioned factors were countered bye1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Response of Sweet Potato”
e1“the above-mentioned factors were countered by the number of branches per plant”
Claim · model-written summary
Inorganic nitrogen fertilizer along with farmyard manure might improve growth, production and yield components of sweet potato (author recommendation).
- Taxon
- sweet potatoesIpomoea batatase0
- Treatment
- inorganic nitrogen fertilizer along with farmyard manuree0
- Outcome
- growth, production, and yield componentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the application of inorganic nitrogen fertilizer along with farmyard manure might improve the growth, production, and yield components of sweet potatoes”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results differ
30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
31 papers more in this group
See all 35 papers →fertilization · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results
125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
141 papers more in this group
See all 145 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.