Paper · 1996 · Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research

EFFICIENCY OF CERTAIN PLANT POWDERS AGAINST THE COWPEA WEEVIL CALLOSOBRUCHUS MACULATUS (F.) (COLEOPTERA: BRUCHIDAE)

TAHEYA S. MOSTAFA; SANAA M. MAHGOUB; SALWA M. S. AHMED

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Three different plant powders, i.e. banana leaves, turmeric rhi‌zomes and dill leaves were studied as repellents and for their biological effects on the adults of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) when added to cowpea seeds as surface treatment at 4% w/w level_ After 1 day of ex‌posure, banana powder was found to be a very good repellent, it has the highest repellency factor (-89) representing 96% of the insects avoiding it. Turmeric and dill powders, also strongly repelled the insects after the first day. Thereafter, repellency of all powders decreased but was more rapidly with banana powder than turmeric and dill. Egg production of the newly emerged adults exposed to all test‌ed powders, highly decreased than control. Banana powder was superior in this respect, and its significant reduction effect continued up to 4 weeks. Percentage of hatchability of produced eggs was significantly re‌duced, but turmeric powder was superior in this respect. Moreover, its effectiveness continued up to 4 weeks, then lowered but still effective. All the tested powders greatly and significantly reduced the per‌centage of Fl emergence. Turmeric powder was the most effective powder in protecting the cowpea seeds against the insect infestation. The bioresidual activity of all tested powders continucd up to 6 weeks after storage but with slightly lower rates (averaged between 0.78 and 0.9) as compared with initial treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Banana powder repelled the cowpea weevil after one day, with repellency factor -89 and 96% avoidance.

Treatment
banana powdere0
Interactor
insectsInsectae0pest
Outcome
repellency factore0
Direction
higheste0
Value
-89e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“banana powder was found to be a very good repellent, it has the highest repellency factor (-89) representing 96% of the insects avoiding it”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–423 · show in text ↑
t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Turmeric and dill powders strongly repelled the insects after one day.

Treatment
Turmeric and dill powderse0
Interactor
insectsInsectae0pest
Outcome
insectse0
Direction
strongly repellede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Turmeric and dill powders, also strongly repelled the insects after the first day”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–506 · show in text ↑
t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repellency declined for all powders, faster with banana than turmeric and dill.

Treatment
banana powdere0
Outcome
repellencye0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
turmeric and dille0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“repellency of all powders decreased but was more rapidly with banana powder than turmeric and dill”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–618 · show in text ↑
t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tested powders reduced egg production compared with control.

Treatment
all test‌ed powderse0
Outcome
Egg productione0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Egg production of the newly emerged adults exposed to all test‌ed powders, highly decreased than control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–724 · show in text ↑
t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Banana powder had the strongest egg production reduction, continuing up to four weeks.

Treatment
Banana powdere0
Outcome
reduction effecte0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
up to 4 weekse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Banana powder was superior in this respect, and its significant reduction effect continued up to 4 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–830 · show in text ↑
t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Powders significantly reduced egg hatchability; turmeric was strongest.

Treatment
turmeric powdere0
Outcome
Percentage of hatchabilitye0
Direction
re‌ducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Percentage of hatchability of produced eggs was significantly re‌duced, but turmeric powder was superior in this respect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–952 · show in text ↑
t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Turmeric hatchability effect continued for four weeks, then weakened but remained effective.

Outcome
effectivenesse0
Direction
lowerede0
Qualifier
up to 4 weekse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“its effectiveness continued up to 4 weeks, then lowered but still effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1039 · show in text ↑
t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All powders significantly reduced F1 emergence.

Treatment
All the tested powderse0
Outcome
per‌centage of Fl emergencee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the tested powders greatly and significantly reduced the per‌centage of Fl emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1129 · show in text ↑
t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Turmeric best protected cowpea seed from insect infestation.

Treatment
Turmeric powdere0
Outcome
protecting the cowpea seeds against the insect infestatione0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Turmeric powder was the most effective powder in protecting the cowpea seeds against the insect infestation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1238 · show in text ↑
t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All powders retained bioresidual activity for six weeks at somewhat lower rates.

Outcome
bioresidual activitye0
Direction
lower ratese0
Value
0.78 and 0.9e0
Qualifier
up to 6 weeks after storagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The bioresidual activity of all tested powders continucd up to 6 weeks after storage but with slightly lower rates (averaged between 0.78 and 0.9)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1386 · show in text ↑
t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑

Curcuma longa · pest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · Insecta · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

botanical · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 60 positive, 45 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

botanical · pest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

126 papers: 123 positive, 3 negative or no effect

122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.