Paper · 2025 · Kurdistan Journal of Applied Research

Analysis of the Metabolic Profile and Biological Activity of Hawthorn Species twigs: Crataegus azarolus and Crataegus monogyna

Hiwa Sheikh Ahmed Qalatobzany; Kadhm Abdullah Muhammad; Djshwar Dhahir Lateef; et al.

9
claims
12
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

All parts of the hawthorn tree (Crataegus spp.), including fruits, flowers, and leaves, have been used as a source of bioactive compounds. Thus, in this investigation, the twigs of two species of hawthorn plant of Crataegus azarolus (C. azarolus) and Crataegus monogyna (C. monogyna) were evaluated for bioactive compositions and biological activity (antioxidant and antimicrobial activities). To evaluate bioactive compositions, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was applied, and for biological activity, biochemical assays were performed. C. monogyna revealed a higher amount of total phenolic, total flavonoid, and total tannin contents compared to C. azarolus. The HPLC results indicated the highest amount of kaempferol (14.40%), catechin (17.70%), and gallic acid (25%) in twigs of C. azarolus, while the maximum quercetin (72%) compound was present in C. monogyna. C. monogyna exhibited higher antioxidant activity by 1,1-dizarophenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) (86.13%) and 2,2′-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS) (92.93%) compared to C. azarolus for antioxidant activity-DPPH (81.86%) and -ABTS (87.47%) assay. In the case of antimicrobial activity, the twigs of both species (especially C. azarolus) have a capacity against Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The results of this study revealed that the twigs of both species contained a high amount of phenolic metabolites and antioxidant activity, while they showed low antimicrobial activity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C. monogyna had higher total phenolic, flavonoid and tannin contents than C. azarolus.

Taxon
C. monogynaCrataegus monogynae1
Outcome
total phenolic, total flavonoid, and total tannin contentse1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
C. azaroluse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Crataegus monogyna
Crataegus monogyna · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“C. monogyna revealed a higher amount of total phenolic, total flavonoid, and total tannin contents compared to C. azarolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–675 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C. azarolus twigs contained the highest amount of kaempferol, 14.40%.

Taxon
C. azarolusCrataegus azaroluse1
Organ / stage
twigse1
Outcome
kaempferole1
Direction
higheste1
Value
14.40%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Crataegus azarolus
Crataegus azarolus · TaxonCillas · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The HPLC results indicated the highest amount of kaempferol (14.40%), catechin (17.70%), and gallic acid (25%) in twigs of C. azarolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–811 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C. azarolus twigs contained the highest amount of catechin, 17.70%.

Taxon
C. azarolusCrataegus azaroluse1
Organ / stage
twigse1
Outcome
catechine1
Direction
higheste1
Value
17.70%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Crataegus azarolus
Crataegus azarolus · TaxonCillas · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The HPLC results indicated the highest amount of kaempferol (14.40%), catechin (17.70%), and gallic acid (25%) in twigs of C. azarolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–811 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C. azarolus twigs contained the highest amount of gallic acid, 25%.

Taxon
C. azarolusCrataegus azaroluse1
Organ / stage
twigse1
Outcome
gallic acide1
Direction
higheste1
Value
25%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Crataegus azarolus
Crataegus azarolus · TaxonCillas · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The HPLC results indicated the highest amount of kaempferol (14.40%), catechin (17.70%), and gallic acid (25%) in twigs of C. azarolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–811 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C. monogyna had the maximum quercetin content, 72%.

Taxon
C. monogynaCrataegus monogynae2
Organ / stage
twigse1
Outcome
quercetine2
Direction
maximume2
Value
72%e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Crataegus monogyna
Crataegus monogyna · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The HPLC results indicated the highest amount of kaempferol (14.40%), catechin (17.70%), and gallic acid (25%) in twigs of C. azarolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–811 · show in text ↑
e2

“while the maximum quercetin (72%) compound was present in C. monogyna”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–882 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C. monogyna showed higher DPPH antioxidant activity, 86.13%, than C. azarolus.

Taxon
C. monogynaCrataegus monogynae3
Outcome
antioxidant activity by 1,1-dizarophenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH)e3
Direction
highere3
Value
86.13%e3
Qualifier
81.86%e3
Comparator
C. azaroluse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Crataegus monogyna
Crataegus monogyna · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“C. monogyna exhibited higher antioxidant activity by 1,1-dizarophenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) (86.13%) and 2,2′-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS) (92.93%) compared to C. azarolus for antioxidant activity-DPPH (81.86%) and -ABTS (87.47%) assay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1149 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C. monogyna showed higher ABTS antioxidant activity, 92.93%, than C. azarolus.

Taxon
C. monogynaCrataegus monogynae3
Outcome
2,2′-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS)e3
Direction
highere3
Value
92.93%e3
Qualifier
87.47%e3
Comparator
C. azaroluse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Crataegus monogyna
Crataegus monogyna · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“C. monogyna exhibited higher antioxidant activity by 1,1-dizarophenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) (86.13%) and 2,2′-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS) (92.93%) compared to C. azarolus for antioxidant activity-DPPH (81.86%) and -ABTS (87.47%) assay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1149 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twigs of both species had a capacity against Bacillus subtilis and Staphylococcus aureus, especially C. azarolus.

Taxon
Crataegus azarolus and Crataegus monogynaCrataegus monogynaCrataegus azarolust0
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise4other
Second interactor
Staphylococcus aureusStaphylococcus aureuse4other
Outcome
antimicrobial activitye4
Qualifier
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureuse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Crataegus monogyna
Crataegus monogyna · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Crataegus azarolus
Crataegus azarolus · TaxonCillas · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Staphylococcus aureus
Staphylococcus aureus · Second interactorContent Providers(s): CDC/ Matthew J. Arduino, DRPH Photo Credit: Janice Haney Carr · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Crataegus azarolus and Crataegus monogyna”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–126 · show in text ↑
e4

“In the case of antimicrobial activity, the twigs of both species (especially C. azarolus) have a capacity against Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1354 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twigs of both species showed low antimicrobial activity.

Taxon
Crataegus azarolus and Crataegus monogynaCrataegus monogynaCrataegus azarolust0
Outcome
antimicrobial activitye1
Direction
lowe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Crataegus monogyna
Crataegus monogyna · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Crataegus azarolus
Crataegus azarolus · TaxonCillas · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Crataegus azarolus and Crataegus monogyna”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“they showed low antimicrobial activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1502–1540 · show in text ↑