Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Plant Biology

Optimization of Vegetative Propagation Techniques for Juniperus communis L. Under Greenhouse Conditions

Marina Sanz Gallego; Miguel Tomás Gascón; Luis Saúl Esteban Pascual

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Juniperus communis L. can be used for essential oils and ornamental purposes, but currently the population is declining in its natural habitats as the seeds are very slow to germinate, with many seeds also empty. These findings could support both the conservation of J. communis and its adoption in sustainable agricultural systems. This study investigated the potential of vegetative propagation evaluating the effects of rooting medium, gender, and Indole 3-Butyric Acid (IBA) treatment on the rooting success of J. communis cuttings. Two types of rooting medium (RM_I vs. RM_II), gender (male vs. female) and two IBA concentrations (0 vs. 4000 ppm) were used. Rooting medium I (RM_I) consists of substrate and perlite (50% + 50%), and rooting medium II (RM II) contains unfertilized blonde peat (65%), substrate (25%), and perlite (10%). The results show the influence of rooting medium, IBA treatment, and gender on the rooting percentage and the number of the primary roots. Female cuttings are more likely to induce rooting than male cuttings (29.69% vs. 19.90%), and the RM_II produces a higher percentage of rooting than RM_I (28.89% vs. 20.70%). In relation to the number of roots per cutting, RM_II was higher than RM_I (7.46 vs. 6.04). Interaction between rooting medium and IBA treatment showed significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) in the rooting percentage. Results showed that cuttings treated with 4000 ppm IBA in RM_II achieved the highest rooting percentage (45.57%), with female cuttings outperforming male cuttings.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Female cuttings rooted more often than male cuttings, 29.69% versus 19.90%.

Taxon
Juniperus communis L.Juniperus communist0
Material
Female cuttingse0
Outcome
rootinge0
Direction
more likelye0
Value
29.69%e0
Qualifier
19.90%e0
Comparator
male cuttingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Juniperus communis
Juniperus communis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Juniperus communis L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Female cuttings are more likely to induce rooting than male cuttings (29.69% vs. 19.90%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1068 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RM_II gave higher rooting than RM_I, 28.89% versus 20.70%.

Taxon
Juniperus communis L.Juniperus communist0
Treatment
RM_IIe0
Outcome
percentage of rootinge0
Direction
highere0
Value
28.89%e0
Qualifier
20.70%e0
Comparator
RM_Ie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Juniperus communis
Juniperus communis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Juniperus communis L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“RM_II produces a higher percentage of rooting than RM_I (28.89% vs. 20.70%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RM_II produced more roots per cutting than RM_I, 7.46 versus 6.04.

Taxon
Juniperus communis L.Juniperus communist0
Treatment
RM_IIe0
Outcome
number of roots per cuttinge0
Direction
highere0
Value
7.46e0
Qualifier
6.04e0
Comparator
RM_Ie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Juniperus communis
Juniperus communis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Juniperus communis L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“number of roots per cutting, RM_II was higher than RM_I (7.46 vs. 6.04)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1245 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rooting medium and IBA treatment interacted significantly for rooting percentage.

Taxon
Juniperus communis L.Juniperus communist0
Treatment
IBA treatmente0
Outcome
rooting percentagee0
Qualifier
rooting mediume0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Juniperus communis
Juniperus communis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Juniperus communis L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Interaction between rooting medium and IBA treatment showed significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) in the rooting percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1367 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cuttings treated with 4000 ppm IBA in RM_II reached the highest rooting percentage, 45.57%.

Taxon
Juniperus communis L.Juniperus communist0
Treatment
4000 ppm IBA in RM_IIe0
Outcome
rooting percentagee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
45.57%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Juniperus communis
Juniperus communis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Juniperus communis L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“cuttings treated with 4000 ppm IBA in RM_II achieved the highest rooting percentage (45.57%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1481 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Female cuttings outperformed male cuttings under 4000 ppm IBA in RM_II.

Taxon
Juniperus communis L.Juniperus communist0
Material
female cuttingse0
Treatment
4000 ppm IBA in RM_IIe0
Outcome
rooting percentagee0
Direction
outperforminge0
Comparator
male cuttingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Juniperus communis
Juniperus communis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Juniperus communis L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“cuttings treated with 4000 ppm IBA in RM_II achieved the highest rooting percentage (45.57%), with female cuttings outperforming male cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1531 · show in text ↑

indole-3-butyric acid · growth · Juniperus communis (common juniper)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.