Paper · 2025 · Oil Crops

Soybean productivity under different methods and systems of primary soil treatment in the second rotation of the crop rotation

V.P. Savenkov

4
claims
4
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The aim of the research is to increase the seed yield and protein and oil yield of soybean by optimizing the methods and systems of primary soil tillage in the second rotation of the crop rotation (with the rotation of crops soybean, winter wheat, spring rapeseed and spring barley) in the conditions of the forest-steppe of the Central Federal Region of Russia. The research was conducted in 2019–2022 at the Lipetsk Rapeseed Research Institute – a branch of V.S. Pustovoit All-Russian Research Institute of Oil Crops. In the field experiment on leached medium-deep heavy loamy chernozem four systems of primary soil treatment, which had the conventional names: moldboard-surface, moldboard-surface with deep loosening, moldboard-surface with shallow loosening and minimal plowing (non-moldboard) were studied. Studies were conducted according to generally accepted methods and State Standards. It was found that the quality of soybean seeds by the content of crude fat and protein in the variants of the experi-ment changed insignificantly. On the average for the years of the second rotation of the crop rotation, higher and relatively equal yield of seeds, protein and oil of this crop was provided by moldboard-surface (plowing for soybean and spring rapeseed, surface tillage for winter wheat and spring barley) and moldboard-surface with deep loosening (deep subsurface loosening for soybean, surface tillage for winter wheat, spring barley and plowing for spring rapeseed) systems of the primary soil treatment. In other vari-ants of the experiment, where shallow or surface tillage was carried out directly under soybean at its cor-responding systems, all the analyzed indicators of productivity decreased significantly and almost equally.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed crude fat and protein content changed insignificantly across variants.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
content of crude fat and proteine0
Direction
changed insignificantlye0
Comparator
variants of the experi-mente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the quality of soybean seeds by the content of crude fat and protein in the variants of the experi-ment changed insignificantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1042 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moldboard-surface and deep loosening systems produced higher, similar seed yield.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
moldboard-surfacee0
Outcome
yield of seedse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher and relatively equal yield of seeds, protein and oil of this crop was provided by moldboard-surface (plowing for soybean and spring rapeseed, surface tillage for winter wheat and spring barley) and moldboard-surface with deep loosening (deep subsurface loosening for soybean, surface tillage for winter wheat, spring barley and plowing for spring rapeseed) systems of the primary soil treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1519 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same two systems gave higher, similar protein and oil yield.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
moldboard-surface with deep looseninge0
Outcome
protein and oile0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher and relatively equal yield of seeds, protein and oil of this crop was provided by moldboard-surface (plowing for soybean and spring rapeseed, surface tillage for winter wheat and spring barley) and moldboard-surface with deep loosening (deep subsurface loosening for soybean, surface tillage for winter wheat, spring barley and plowing for spring rapeseed) systems of the primary soil treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1519 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shallow or surface tillage under soybean significantly reduced productivity indicators.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
shallow or surface tillagee0
Outcome
indicators of productivitye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“where shallow or surface tillage was carried out directly under soybean at its cor-responding systems, all the analyzed indicators of productivity decreased significantly and almost equally.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1558–1748 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

390 papers: 264 positive, 126 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 264 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

386 papers more in this group

See all 390 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.