Paper · 2025 · Asian Research Journal of Agriculture

Tillage Operations and Fertilizer Applications on the Growth and Yield Response of Sweet Corn (Zea mays L. var. Saccharata)

Redelia D. Berdin; Onofre S. Corpuz

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Sweet corn (Zea mays var. saccharata) has become an increasingly important crop in the Philippines due to its nutritional value and market demand. This study investigated the effects of different tillage operations and fertilizer applications on the growth and yield of sweet corn and assess the agricultural practices and challenges faced by sweet corn farmers in the region. A randomized complete block design (RCBD) was employed, with four treatments: zero tillage with urea, zero tillage with vermicompost, conventional tillage with urea, and conventional tillage with vermicompost. Data were gathered on germination index, plant height, ear length, ear diameter, and ear weight, with statistical analysis conducted using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Pearson’s correlation. Findings revealed that plant height was significantly greater in conventional tillage with vermicompost with a mean of 197.6cm. Ear weight was significantly affected by the treatment, with conventional tillage with urea yielding the highest mean weight of 14.21 kg. Return on investment was highest for conventional tillage with vermicompost at 83.6%, offering substantial profitability.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage with vermicompost gave significantly greater plant height, averaging 197.6cm.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
conventional tillage with vermicomposte0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
greatere0
Value
197.6cme0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Corn (Zea mays L. var. Saccharata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“Findings revealed that plant height was significantly greater in conventional tillage with vermicompost with a mean of 197.6cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–908 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage with urea had the highest mean ear weight of 14.21 kg; treatment differences were significant.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
conventional tillage with ureae0
Outcome
Ear weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
14.21 kge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Corn (Zea mays L. var. Saccharata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“Ear weight was significantly affected by the treatment, with conventional tillage with urea yielding the highest mean weight of 14.21 kg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1046 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage with vermicompost had the highest return on investment at 83.6%.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
conventional tillage with vermicomposte0
Outcome
Return on investmente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
83.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Corn (Zea mays L. var. Saccharata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“Return on investment was highest for conventional tillage with vermicompost at 83.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1132 · show in text ↑

tillage · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 196 positive, 87 negative or no effect

195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 81 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

279 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

fertilization · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,365 papers: 1,196 positive, 169 negative or no effect

1,195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 149 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1,361 papers more in this group

See all 1,365 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.