Paper · 2025 · Journal of Insects as Food and Feed

Frass pre-treatment and application method impact spring wheat vegetative growth and nutrient concentration

S. Capitan; Å. Berggren; M. Weih

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract The house cricket ( Acheta domesticus ) is a widely farmed edible insect species, and its by-product – frass – has potential as a sustainable soil amendment. However, the efficacy of frass may depend on how it is pre-treated and applied. This study evaluated the effects of cricket frass on the vegetative growth and nutrient concentration of spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum ) under different frass pre-treatments and application methods. Wheat was pot-grown in a greenhouse for eight weeks — from seed germination to flowering — with one control (no frass) and six experimental treatments, combining two pre-treatments (non-heated and heat-treated frass) and three frass application methods (surface application, mixed into the substrate, and 2-week delayed application). Germination, plant height, shoot biomass, leaf chlorophyll content, and shoot nutrient concentration were measured. Frass pre-treatment and application method significantly influenced wheat growth and nutrient concentration. Germination reached 100% with heat-treated frass mixed into the substrate and delayed application of no-heat frass but dropped to 60% with surface-applied heat-treated frass. The tallest plants grew with no-heat frass mixed into the substrate, while surface application, regardless of heat treatment, produced the greatest shoot biomass. Delayed application, regardless of pre-treatment, resulted in the highest leaf chlorophyll content. Surface-applied heat-treated frass increased plant nitrogen and potassium concentrations, whereas no-heat mixed frass enhanced phosphorus levels. These findings demonstrate that cricket frass can improve wheat growth and nutrient concentration, but its effects vary by pre-treatment and application method. Optimising these factors could maximise its potential as a sustainable soil amendment in crop production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat-treated frass mixed into substrate yielded 100% germination.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
heat-treated frass mixed into the substratee0
Outcome
Germinatione0
Direction
reachede0
Value
100%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“Germination reached 100% with heat-treated frass mixed into the substrate and delayed application of no-heat frass but dropped to 60% with surface-applied heat-treated frass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1182 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed no-heat frass application yielded 100% germination.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
delayed application of no-heat frasse0
Outcome
Germinatione0
Direction
reachede0
Value
100%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“Germination reached 100% with heat-treated frass mixed into the substrate and delayed application of no-heat frass but dropped to 60% with surface-applied heat-treated frass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1182 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surface-applied heat-treated frass reduced germination to 60%.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
surface-applied heat-treated frasse0
Outcome
Germinatione0
Direction
droppede0
Value
60%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“Germination reached 100% with heat-treated frass mixed into the substrate and delayed application of no-heat frass but dropped to 60% with surface-applied heat-treated frass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1182 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-heat frass mixed into substrate produced the tallest wheat plants.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
no-heat frass mixed into the substratee0
Outcome
tallest plantse0
Direction
talleste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“The tallest plants grew with no-heat frass mixed into the substrate, while surface application, regardless of heat treatment, produced the greatest shoot biomass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1345 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surface frass application produced the greatest shoot biomass regardless of heat treatment.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
surface applicatione0
Outcome
shoot biomasse0
Direction
greateste0
Qualifier
regardless of heat treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“surface application, regardless of heat treatment, produced the greatest shoot biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed application yielded the highest leaf chlorophyll content regardless of pretreatment.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Delayed applicatione0
Outcome
leaf chlorophyll contente0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
regardless of pre-treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“Delayed application, regardless of pre-treatment, resulted in the highest leaf chlorophyll content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1346–1445 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surface-applied heat-treated frass increased wheat nitrogen concentration.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Surface-applied heat-treated frasse0
Outcome
plant nitrogene0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“Surface-applied heat-treated frass increased plant nitrogen and potassium concentrations, whereas no-heat mixed frass enhanced phosphorus levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1446–1591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surface-applied heat-treated frass increased wheat potassium concentration.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Surface-applied heat-treated frasse0
Outcome
potassium concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“Surface-applied heat-treated frass increased plant nitrogen and potassium concentrations, whereas no-heat mixed frass enhanced phosphorus levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1446–1591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-heat mixed frass enhanced wheat phosphorus levels.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
no-heat mixed frasse0
Outcome
phosphorus levelse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“no-heat mixed frass enhanced phosphorus levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1544–1590 · show in text ↑

heat · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

31 papers: 9 positive, 22 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

growing medium · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 13 positive, 4 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

heat · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

131 papers: 42 positive, 89 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 88 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.