Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Response of finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.) to various levels and methods of nano DAP application on growth and yield

Akash SK; O Kumar; TM Soumya; et al.

10
claims
28
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at KSNUAHS, Shivamogga, India during rabi 2023 to evaluate the effect of nano DAP on the growth and yield of finger millet. The experiment was laid out in RCBD with twelve treatments and replicated thrice. Various levels and methods of nano DAP treatments were evaluated, among the tested treatments application of 100 per cent recommended dose of N & P along with seed treatment of nano DAP 4 ml kg-1 of seeds at 30 DAT (T6) recorded higher plant height (95.07 cm), number of tillers (8.87), root volume at 90 and at harvest DAT (12.95 and 13.95, respectively), the yield attributes like grain yield kg ha-1 (3639.32), test weight (3.29 g), straw yield kg ha-1 (6460.86 kg ha-1), were also found significantly higher in same treatment. It also recorded higher gross returns (1,30,198 ₹ ha-1), net returns (76,602 ₹ ha-1), and B:C ratio (2.43) compared to recommended dose of fertilizers, 9.73 per cent increased grain yield was noted with nano DAP application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment with nano DAP plus full recommended N and P gave higher plant height than the other tested treatments.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae2
Treatment
seed treatment of nano DAP 4 ml kg-1 of seeds at 30 DATe1
Outcome
plant heighte1
Direction
highere1
Value
95.07 cme1
Comparator
tested treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“among the tested treatments application of 100 per cent recommended dose of N & P along with seed treatment of nano DAP 4 ml kg-1 of seeds at 30 DAT (T6) recorded higher plant height (95.07 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–498 · show in text ↑
e2

“the growth and yield of finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same nano DAP treatment gave a higher number of tillers than the other tested treatments.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae3
Treatment
seed treatment of nano DAP 4 ml kg-1 of seeds at 30 DATe1
Outcome
number of tillerse2
Direction
highere1
Value
8.87e2
Comparator
tested treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“among the tested treatments application of 100 per cent recommended dose of N & P along with seed treatment of nano DAP 4 ml kg-1 of seeds at 30 DAT (T6) recorded higher plant height (95.07 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–498 · show in text ↑
e2

“number of tillers (8.87)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–524 · show in text ↑
e3

“the growth and yield of finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same nano DAP treatment gave higher root volume at 90 and at harvest DAT.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae3
Treatment
seed treatment of nano DAP 4 ml kg-1 of seeds at 30 DATe1
Outcome
root volumee2
Direction
highere1
Value
12.95 and 13.95e2
Qualifier
at 90 and at harvest DATe2
Comparator
tested treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“among the tested treatments application of 100 per cent recommended dose of N & P along with seed treatment of nano DAP 4 ml kg-1 of seeds at 30 DAT (T6) recorded higher plant height (95.07 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–498 · show in text ↑
e2

“root volume at 90 and at harvest DAT (12.95 and 13.95, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–594 · show in text ↑
e3

“the growth and yield of finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same nano DAP treatment gave significantly higher grain yield (3639.32 kg/ha as written).

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae3
Treatment
seed treatment of nano DAP 4 ml kg-1 of seeds at 30 DATe1
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
highere2
Value
3639.32e2
Comparator
tested treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“among the tested treatments application of 100 per cent recommended dose of N & P along with seed treatment of nano DAP 4 ml kg-1 of seeds at 30 DAT (T6) recorded higher plant height (95.07 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–498 · show in text ↑
e2

“the yield attributes like grain yield kg ha-1 (3639.32), test weight (3.29 g), straw yield kg ha-1 (6460.86 kg ha-1), were also found significantly higher in same treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–768 · show in text ↑
e3

“the growth and yield of finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same nano DAP treatment gave significantly higher test weight (3.29 g).

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae3
Treatment
seed treatment of nano DAP 4 ml kg-1 of seeds at 30 DATe1
Outcome
test weighte2
Direction
highere2
Value
3.29 ge2
Comparator
tested treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“among the tested treatments application of 100 per cent recommended dose of N & P along with seed treatment of nano DAP 4 ml kg-1 of seeds at 30 DAT (T6) recorded higher plant height (95.07 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–498 · show in text ↑
e2

“the yield attributes like grain yield kg ha-1 (3639.32), test weight (3.29 g), straw yield kg ha-1 (6460.86 kg ha-1), were also found significantly higher in same treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–768 · show in text ↑
e3

“the growth and yield of finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same nano DAP treatment gave significantly higher straw yield (6460.86 kg/ha as written).

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae3
Treatment
seed treatment of nano DAP 4 ml kg-1 of seeds at 30 DATe1
Outcome
straw yielde2
Direction
highere2
Value
6460.86 kg ha-1e2
Comparator
tested treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“among the tested treatments application of 100 per cent recommended dose of N & P along with seed treatment of nano DAP 4 ml kg-1 of seeds at 30 DAT (T6) recorded higher plant height (95.07 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–498 · show in text ↑
e2

“the yield attributes like grain yield kg ha-1 (3639.32), test weight (3.29 g), straw yield kg ha-1 (6460.86 kg ha-1), were also found significantly higher in same treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–768 · show in text ↑
e3

“the growth and yield of finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same nano DAP treatment gave higher gross returns than the recommended dose of fertilizers.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae3
Treatment
seed treatment of nano DAP 4 ml kg-1 of seeds at 30 DATe1
Outcome
gross returnse2
Direction
highere2
Value
1,30,198 ₹ ha-1e2
Comparator
recommended dose of fertilizerse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“among the tested treatments application of 100 per cent recommended dose of N & P along with seed treatment of nano DAP 4 ml kg-1 of seeds at 30 DAT (T6) recorded higher plant height (95.07 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–498 · show in text ↑
e2

“It also recorded higher gross returns (1,30,198 ₹ ha-1), net returns (76,602 ₹ ha-1), and B:C ratio (2.43) compared to recommended dose of fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–920 · show in text ↑
e3

“the growth and yield of finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same nano DAP treatment gave higher net returns than the recommended dose of fertilizers.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae3
Treatment
seed treatment of nano DAP 4 ml kg-1 of seeds at 30 DATe1
Outcome
net returnse2
Direction
highere2
Value
76,602 ₹ ha-1e2
Comparator
recommended dose of fertilizerse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“among the tested treatments application of 100 per cent recommended dose of N & P along with seed treatment of nano DAP 4 ml kg-1 of seeds at 30 DAT (T6) recorded higher plant height (95.07 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–498 · show in text ↑
e2

“It also recorded higher gross returns (1,30,198 ₹ ha-1), net returns (76,602 ₹ ha-1), and B:C ratio (2.43) compared to recommended dose of fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–920 · show in text ↑
e3

“the growth and yield of finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same nano DAP treatment gave a higher B:C ratio than the recommended dose of fertilizers.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae3
Treatment
seed treatment of nano DAP 4 ml kg-1 of seeds at 30 DATe1
Outcome
B:C ratioe2
Direction
highere2
Value
2.43e2
Comparator
recommended dose of fertilizerse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“among the tested treatments application of 100 per cent recommended dose of N & P along with seed treatment of nano DAP 4 ml kg-1 of seeds at 30 DAT (T6) recorded higher plant height (95.07 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–498 · show in text ↑
e2

“It also recorded higher gross returns (1,30,198 ₹ ha-1), net returns (76,602 ₹ ha-1), and B:C ratio (2.43) compared to recommended dose of fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–920 · show in text ↑
e3

“the growth and yield of finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano DAP application increased grain yield by 9.73 per cent.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae2
Treatment
nano DAP applicatione1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
9.73 per cente1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“9.73 per cent increased grain yield was noted with nano DAP application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–993 · show in text ↑
e2

“the growth and yield of finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–155 · show in text ↑

seed treatment · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
    NP (67.2 kg N/ha) gave finger millet grain yields similar to NPK application (11.4 and 10.5 q/ha).

    Additive effect of fertilizer applications on rainfed finger millet. · 1975 · compared with NPK (67.2kg N, 44.4kg each of P and K/ha) application

    No difference from an alternative

  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

seed treatment · quality: grain · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: grain · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.