Paper · 2025 · Environmental and Sustainability Indicators

Impacts of using biopesticides on tomato yield and self-consumption: Evidence from saline-prone areas in Bangladesh

Kazi Khalid Hossain; Niraj Prakash Joshi

7
claims
9
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Biopesticides derived from naturally generated compounds are urgently required for sustainable agriculture, particularly in salinity-prone regions like Bangladesh. Despite their potential, the effects of biopesticides on crop yield in real-world farming scenarios remain underexplored. We aimed to examine the impacts of biopesticide application on tomato yield and self-consumption in salinity-prone areas of Bangladesh. We employed propensity score matching to assess the impacts. Robustness checks were conducted using inverse probability-weighted regression adjustment and Rosenbaum bounds sensitivity analysis to ensure that estimators were unbiased. Our results indicated that biopesticide application reduced tomato yield by 28.83 kg per decimal of land, a corresponding decrease in marketed quantity by 392.67 kg per farmer, and also reduced the selling price. However, the farmers’ self-consumption increased by 4.97 kg, which was statistically significant. We also established that farmers who used both chemicals and biopesticides experienced a loss in tomato yield by 9.58 kg per decimal of land and a decrease in marketed amount by 62.44 kg per farmer, though statistically insignificant. However, self-consumption increased by 3.13 kg per household. The combined use of chemicals and biopesticides, despite expected to enhance pest control efficiency while reducing reliance on chemical pesticides, considerably affected self-consumption and tomato yield, highlighting both benefits and challenges in their adoption. While they promote self-consumption, yield reduction poses barriers to widespread use. • Biopesticides reduced tomato yield by 28.83 kg per decimal in salinity-prone areas. • Marketed tomato quantity decreased by 392.67 kg per farmer with biopesticide use. • Farmers' self-consumption increased significantly by 4.97 kg per household. • Combined use of chemicals and biopesticides reduced yield but raised self-consumption. • Sensitivity analysis confirms results are unaffected by hidden bias.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biopesticide application reduced tomato yield by 28.83 kg per decimal.

Treatment
biopesticide applicatione0
Outcome
tomato yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
28.83 kg per decimal of lande0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biopesticide application reduced tomato yield by 28.83 kg per decimal of land”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–760 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biopesticide use reduced marketed tomato quantity by 392.67 kg per farmer.

Treatment
biopesticide applicatione0
Outcome
marketed quantitye0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
392.67 kg per farmere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biopesticide application reduced tomato yield by 28.83 kg per decimal of land, a corresponding decrease in marketed quantity by 392.67 kg per farmer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–831 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biopesticide use reduced tomato selling price.

Treatment
biopesticide applicatione0
Outcome
selling pricee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biopesticide application reduced tomato yield by 28.83 kg per decimal of land, a corresponding decrease in marketed quantity by 392.67 kg per farmer, and also reduced the selling price”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–867 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biopesticide use increased farmers’ tomato self-consumption by 4.97 kg.

Outcome
self-consumptione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4.97 kge0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the farmers’ self-consumption increased by 4.97 kg, which was statistically significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–965 · show in text ↑
t0

“Impacts of using biopesticides on tomato yield and self-consumption: Evidence from saline-prone areas in Bangladesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined chemicals and biopesticides lowered tomato yield by 9.58 kg per decimal, without statistical significance.

Treatment
both chemicals and biopesticidese0
Outcome
tomato yielde0
Direction
losse0
Value
9.58 kg per decimal of lande0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“farmers who used both chemicals and biopesticides experienced a loss in tomato yield by 9.58 kg per decimal of land”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined chemicals and biopesticides lowered marketed amount by 62.44 kg per farmer, without statistical significance.

Treatment
both chemicals and biopesticidese0
Outcome
marketed amounte0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
62.44 kg per farmere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“farmers who used both chemicals and biopesticides experienced a loss in tomato yield by 9.58 kg per decimal of land and a decrease in marketed amount by 62.44 kg per farmer, though statistically insignificant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1200 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined use increased household self-consumption by 3.13 kg.

Outcome
self-consumptione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3.13 kg per householde0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“self-consumption increased by 3.13 kg per household”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1262 · show in text ↑
t0

“Impacts of using biopesticides on tomato yield and self-consumption: Evidence from saline-prone areas in Bangladesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–115 · show in text ↑

biocontrol · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 24 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.