biocontrol · Yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)
31 claims from these papers; 4 citations between them.
Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.
How these papers cite each other
4 citations between these papers: 1 on the same side, 3 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 24
- positive
EFFECTS OF FIELD APPLICATION OF VARIOUS MICRO-ORGANISMS ON MELOIDOGYNE INCOGNITA ON TOMATO · 1999
- positive
- positive
Efficacy and economics of Biopesticides combinations and Insecticide against Tomato fruit borer · 2010
- positive
- positive
Biopesticide Formulation to Control Tomato Lepidopteran Pest Menace 1 · 2012
- positive
BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF TOMATO PESTS IN EGYPT · 2012
- positive
- positive
- positive
Control Effects of Several Biocontrol Agents on Tomato Root-knot Nematode · 2013
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Effect of Combination between Bioagents and Antioxidants on Management of Tomato Powdery Mildew · 2014
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Development of biorational management for tomato leaf miner, Tuta absoluta · 2019
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Pests, Diseases, Growth and Yield of Tomato as Influenced by Variety and Cultivation Technology · 2024
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 3
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
- negative
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.