Paper · 2025 · Agricultural Water Management

Optimizing fertilizer application and straw return to fields to minimize nitrogen and phosphorus runoff losses in double-rice cropping systems

Ying Zhang; Jian Zhu; Changjun Li; et al.

17
claims
34
verbatim quotes
8
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Runoff losses of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) from paddy fields pose considerable eutrophication risks to surrounding water and raise non-point source pollution. Unknown of long-term patterns of losses and mechanisms driving runoff N and P in double-rice cropping systems limited the development of effective mitigation strategies. In this study, typical subtropical double-cropped paddy ecosystems were selected for observation, and total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) concentrations, TN and TP loss loads, grain yields, and soil fertility under no fertilization (TR1), conventional fertilization (TR2, with chemical fertilizer inputs of 150/180 kg N ha −1 and 90/90 kg P 2 O 5 ha −1 for the early/late rice seasons), optimized fertilization (TR3, 105/135 kg N ha −1 and 67.5/36 kg P 2 O 5 ha −1 ), reduced N and P fertilization (TR4, 52.5/67.5 kg N ha −1 and 33.8/18 kg P 2 O 5 ha −1 ), increased N and P fertilization (TR5, 180/210 kg N ha −1 and 112.5/112.5 kg P 2 O 5 ha −1 ), and straw return (TR6, with chemical fertilizer inputs of 78.9/82.8 kg N ha −1 and 60.6/22.2 kg P 2 O 5 ha −1 , and 2250/4500 kg ha −1 rice straw returning to fields to maintain equivalent N and P inputs as TR3) were continuously monitored for seven years. The results revealed that (1) the 0–20 days after fertilization was a high-risk period, contributing 41.7–56.6 % of annual TN and 20.2–25.8 % of TP loss loads. (2) TN loss predominantly occurred during the early rice season (58.3–61.3 %), while TP loss is evenly distributed across the winter fallow and two rice seasons. (3) Optimized fertilization significantly decreased TN and TP losses by 11.7 % and 13.7 % compared with conventional fertilization ( P < 0.05), with marginal yield reduction (6.03–6.18 %). Straw return further diminished TN and TP losses by 20.1 % and 11.5 %, and enhanced soil organic matter and TN contents by 6.34 % and 4.57 %, respectively. (4) Runoff TN and TP concentrations increased sharply when soil TN and TP exceeded 1.99 and 1.02 g kg −1 , respectively. (5) Fertilizer rate primarily impacted TN loss, while soil TP content strongly correlated with TP loss, with runoff volume affecting both. This study emphasizes that P loss in the winter fallow season should not be overlooked, and that combining optimized fertilization with straw return is an eco-friendly, cost-effective measure that lowers N and P losses without crop yields reduction and soil fertility degradation. Understanding N and P losses patterns in subtropical double-cropping paddy fields with various agricultural management measures aids in assessing runoff water reuse potential, to achieve a virtuous cycle of water and nutrients.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The first 20 days after fertilization accounted for 41.7–56.6 % of annual TN loss.

Outcome
TNe0
Value
41.7–56.6 %e0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 0–20 days after fertilization was a high-risk period, contributing 41.7–56.6 % of annual TN and 20.2–25.8 % of TP loss loads”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1410 · show in text ↑
t0

“double-rice cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–142 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The first 20 days after fertilization accounted for 20.2–25.8 % of annual TP loss.

Outcome
TP loss loadse0
Value
20.2–25.8 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 0–20 days after fertilization was a high-risk period, contributing 41.7–56.6 % of annual TN and 20.2–25.8 % of TP loss loads”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1410 · show in text ↑
t0

“double-rice cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–142 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The early rice season accounted for 58.3–61.3 % of TN loss.

Outcome
TN losse0
Value
58.3–61.3 %e0
Setting
early rice seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TN loss predominantly occurred during the early rice season (58.3–61.3 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1489 · show in text ↑
t0

“double-rice cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–142 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TP loss was distributed evenly across winter fallow and both rice seasons.

Outcome
TP losse0
Setting
winter fallow and two rice seasonse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TP loss is evenly distributed across the winter fallow and two rice seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1572 · show in text ↑
t0

“double-rice cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimized fertilization decreased TN loss 11.7 % against conventional fertilization.

Treatment
Optimized fertilizatione0
Outcome
TNe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
11.7 %e0
Comparator
conventional fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Optimized fertilization significantly decreased TN and TP losses by 11.7 % and 13.7 % compared with conventional fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1578–1704 · show in text ↑
t0

“double-rice cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimized fertilization decreased TP loss 13.7 % against conventional fertilization.

Treatment
Optimized fertilizatione0
Outcome
TP lossese0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
13.7 %e0
Comparator
conventional fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Optimized fertilization significantly decreased TN and TP losses by 11.7 % and 13.7 % compared with conventional fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1578–1704 · show in text ↑
t0

“double-rice cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimized fertilization reduced grain yield by 6.03–6.18 %.

Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
6.03–6.18 %e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with marginal yield reduction (6.03–6.18 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1718–1761 · show in text ↑
t0

“double-rice cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw return reduced TN loss by 20.1 %.

Treatment
Straw returne0
Outcome
TNe0
Direction
diminishede0
Value
20.1 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Straw return further diminished TN and TP losses by 20.1 % and 11.5 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1763–1832 · show in text ↑
t0

“double-rice cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw return reduced TP loss by 11.5 %.

Treatment
Straw returne0
Outcome
TP lossese0
Direction
diminishede0
Value
11.5 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Straw return further diminished TN and TP losses by 20.1 % and 11.5 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1763–1832 · show in text ↑
t0

“double-rice cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw return increased soil organic matter by 6.34 %.

Outcome
soil organic mattere0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
6.34 %e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“enhanced soil organic matter and TN contents by 6.34 % and 4.57 %, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1838–1917 · show in text ↑
t0

“double-rice cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw return increased soil TN content by 4.57 %.

Outcome
TN contentse0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
4.57 %e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“enhanced soil organic matter and TN contents by 6.34 % and 4.57 %, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1838–1917 · show in text ↑
t0

“double-rice cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–142 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Runoff TN concentration rose sharply above soil TN of 1.99 g kg −1.

Compound
soil TNe0
Outcome
Runoff TNe0
Direction
increased sharplye0
Value
1.99e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Runoff TN and TP concentrations increased sharply when soil TN and TP exceeded 1.99 and 1.02 g kg −1 , respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1923–2038 · show in text ↑
t0

“double-rice cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–142 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Runoff TP concentration rose sharply above soil TP of 1.02 g kg −1.

Compound
TPe0
Outcome
TP concentrationse0
Direction
increased sharplye0
Value
1.02 g kg −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Runoff TN and TP concentrations increased sharply when soil TN and TP exceeded 1.99 and 1.02 g kg −1 , respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1923–2038 · show in text ↑
t0

“double-rice cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–142 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer rate primarily affected TN loss.

Treatment
Fertilizer ratee0
Outcome
TN losse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer rate primarily impacted TN loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2044–2086 · show in text ↑
t0

“double-rice cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–142 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil TP content was strongly correlated with TP loss.

Compound
soil TP contente0
Outcome
TP losse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil TP content strongly correlated with TP loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2094–2142 · show in text ↑
t0

“double-rice cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–142 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Runoff volume affected both TN and TP loss.

Outcome
runoff volumee0

Not reportedSettingDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with runoff volume affecting both”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2144–2177 · show in text ↑
t0

“double-rice cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–142 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend optimized fertilization with straw return to lower N and P losses.

Treatment
optimized fertilization with straw returne0
Outcome
combining optimized fertilization with straw returne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combining optimized fertilization with straw return is an eco-friendly, cost-effective measure that lowers N and P losses without crop yields reduction and soil fertility degradation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2276–2458 · show in text ↑
t0

“double-rice cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–142 · show in text ↑

organic · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

106 papers: 96 positive, 10 negative or no effect

95 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

102 papers more in this group

See all 106 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

993 papers: 932 positive, 61 negative or no effect

931 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

989 papers more in this group

See all 993 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.