Claim · model-written summary
U + CRF reduced TN losses through runoff and leaching compared with CN.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- U + CRFe0
- Outcome
- losses of TN through runoff and leachinge0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Comparator
- CNe0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The U + CRF and ON treatments resulted in a significant reduction in losses of TN through runoff and leaching and the loss of TP through leaching compared to CN”
t0“rice”
Title
Dongliang Qi; Qixia Wu; Jianqiang Zhu Scientific Reports 2020. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-66757-5
Other claims from this paper (18)
- Intervention effect SIDS significantly reduced irrigation frequency relative to FI.
- Intervention effect SIDS significantly reduced irrigation water amount relative to FI.
- Intervention effect SIDS raised rainfall use efficiency by 16.2% relative to FI.
- Intervention effect SIDS reduced surface runoff and leached water relative to FI.
- Intervention effect SIDS decreased total N and total P losses through runoff leaching.
- Intervention effect ON reduced TN losses through runoff and leaching compared with CN.
- Intervention effect U + CRF reduced TP leaching loss compared with CN.
- Intervention effect ON reduced TP leaching loss compared with CN.
- Intervention effect SIDS gave comparable or greater soil TN and TP after harvest than FI.
- Intervention effect SIDS gave comparable or greater N and P accumulation at jointing, filling and maturity than FI.
- Intervention effect SIDS gave comparable or greater grain yield than FI.
- Intervention effect U + CRF improved or maintained rice N and P accumulation and yield compared with CN.
- Intervention effect ON improved or maintained rice N and P accumulation and yield compared with CN.
- Intervention effect SIDS with U + CRF reduced N and P losses versus FI with CN.
- Intervention effect SIDS with ON reduced N and P losses versus FI with CN.
- Intervention effect SIDS with U + CRF enhanced or maintained N and P accumulation and grain yield versus FI with CN.
- Intervention effect SIDS with ON enhanced or maintained N and P accumulation and grain yield versus FI with CN.
- Recommendation The authors recommend SIDS with new N management to reduce N and P losses while supporting high rice yield.